ESPR and the Batteries Regulation can apply to the same saleable product, but they ask different scope questions. ESPR establishes a broad framework for product-group ecodesign and information requirements. Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 already governs all categories of batteries and waste batteries, including batteries incorporated into products, and sets category-specific passport, conformity, supply-chain, and end-of-life rules. A product containing an electric-vehicle, LMT, or industrial battery may therefore need a product-level ESPR assessment and a separate battery-level assessment. Reuse a fact only when its legal basis, covered object, method, version, and access rights match.
Comparison matrix
ESPR framework duties vs Batteries Regulation product-specific duties
Read the rows as a scoping crosswalk. ESPR creates the cross-product framework; the Batteries Regulation already fixes battery categories, evidence duties, and passport rules for the batteries it covers.
A framework regulation for setting ecodesign requirements, information requirements, DPP rules, mandatory green public procurement requirements, and unsold-goods controls for product groups through later measures.
Second framework
Batteries Regulation
A product-specific regulation for batteries and waste batteries, with its own conformity, labelling, waste, due-diligence, market-surveillance, and structure.
ESPR framework duties vs Batteries Regulation product-specific duties
ESPR broadly covers physical goods placed on the EU market or put into service, including components and intermediate products, with listed exclusions such as food, feed, medicinal products, living organisms, and certain vehicle aspects covered by sector-specific law.
Article 1 identifies the broad physical-goods scope and exclusions.
applies to any physical goods
The Batteries Regulation applies to all battery categories, regardless of shape, volume, weight, design, material composition, chemistry, use, or purpose, including batteries incorporated into or added to products. It excludes equipment connected with essential Member State security interests, arms and war material except products not intended for specifically military purposes, and equipment designed to be sent into space.
The regulation is the cited source for the battery and waste-battery scope side of this page.
batteries and waste batteries
Create two scope records: one for the product or product group under ESPR, and one for the battery, battery model, or waste-battery flow under the Batteries Regulation. For a product containing a battery, test both regimes; neither scope conclusion answers the other.
Commission page confirms ESPR extends beyond energy-related products to nearly all physical products, while product-specific rules still need implementation.
ESPR assigns duties to manufacturers, authorised representatives, importers, distributors, dealers, fulfilment service providers, and other economic operators according to their role and the applicable delegated act. It also gives online marketplaces and search engines cooperation duties and creates separate unsold-goods duties for covered economic operators.
Commission overview explains that ESPR product rules are developed product-by-product or horizontally after prioritisation and consultation.
framework legislation that lays the foundation
The Batteries Regulation assigns product duties to battery manufacturers, authorised representatives, importers, distributors, fulfilment service providers, and other economic operators. Its end-of-life chapter separately regulates producers and producer-responsibility organisations, distributors, end-users, collection points, treatment operators, recyclers, and public waste-management actors.
Primary Batteries Regulation source for battery-specific conformity, passport, waste, and market-surveillance obligations.
concerning batteries and waste batteries
Map the legal role for each obligation. A company may be a manufacturer or importer for conformity duties, a producer for extended producer responsibility, and the operator placing the battery on the market for passport duties; those labels are not interchangeable.
ESPR defines ecodesign requirements as performance or information requirements. Product-group rules can address durability, reparability, energy and resource efficiency, substances that inhibit circularity, recycled content, remanufacturing, recycling, carbon footprint, environmental footprint, waste, and sustainability information.
Commission overview lists examples of ESPR requirement areas such as durability, reparability, recycled content, footprints, and waste.
performance and information rules
The Batteries Regulation uses battery-specific requirement families, including carbon-footprint and recycled-content documentation, performance and durability parameters, labelling and marking, conformity documentation, due-diligence information, waste-battery information, and passport access rules.
Annex XIII and conformity-assessment provisions ground the battery-side examples used in this row.
INFORMATION TO BE INCLUDED IN THE BATTERY PASSPORT
Map data fields by obligation, not by label. A recycled-content or carbon-footprint data point may appear in both programs, but the calculation method, document owner, verifier, access level, and update trigger can differ.
Under ESPR, a DPP is a set of product-specific data identified in the applicable delegated act and accessible electronically through a data carrier. ESPR DPP content is therefore product-group dependent until a delegated act fixes it.
The guidance states that legally required ESPR DPP content may vary by product group and delegated act.
may vary depending on the product group
The has a defined Batteries Regulation structure. Annex XIII separates public model information, restricted model information, information for notified bodies and authorities, and individual-battery data such as performance, state of health, status, and use-related records.
Annex XIII grounds the battery passport information categories and access tiers.
accessible only to persons with a legitimate interest
Build a shared passport architecture only at the platform layer: identifiers, data carriers, access control, auditability, and retention can be common services. The actual fields and access rights must remain regulation-specific until a source says they match.
For ESPR, keep the product-scope conclusion, applicable delegated act or working-plan reference, requirement mapping, DPP design decision, data-carrier approach, access-rights rationale, supplier-data source, and change log for each product group.
ESPR definitions and DPP provisions ground the evidence categories for product-scope, information requirements, data carriers, and delegated-act mapping.
information specified in the applicable delegated act
CWA guidance supports maintaining DPP design records for audiences, access, product levels, and regulatory information needs.
target audience should be taken into consideration
For batteries, keep battery-model identification, passport field mapping to Annex XIII, technical documentation, EU declaration of conformity, carbon-footprint and recycled-content support where applicable, access-rights decisions, and evidence for any waste or status change record.
Annex XIII and conformity-assessment provisions ground the battery passport and evidence examples in this row.
results of test reports proving compliance
A shared evidence repository is useful only if it preserves the source, article or annex, product or battery model, data owner, date, validation method, and audience for every reused record.
ESPR entered into force on 18 July 2024. The Commission overview says the first ESPR and Energy Labelling Working Plan was adopted in April 2025 and that product rules will be developed after prioritisation, impact assessment, Ecodesign Forum work, and consultations.
no specific product information requirements are available
The Batteries Regulation applies generally from 18 February 2024, subject to provision-specific dates. From 18 February 2027, each , each industrial battery with capacity greater than 2 kWh, and each electric-vehicle battery placed on the market or put into service must have a . Portable batteries and industrial batteries at or below 2 kWh are not brought into Article 77 merely because another battery category needs a passport.
Articles 77 and 96 establish the 18 February 2027 passport start for LMT batteries, industrial batteries above 2 kWh, and electric-vehicle batteries, and the regulation's general application from 18 February 2024.
From 18 February 2027
Use separate date registers. For ESPR, distinguish the non-binding planning signal from the delegated act's entry into force and application date; Article 4 generally requires at least 18 months before application unless a stated exception applies. For batteries, record the category, capacity where relevant, each provision-specific date, the 18 February 2027 Article 77 start date, and any later act that changes a method or format.
Commission DPP consultation source supports treating DPP implementation details as a developing workstream rather than fixed across all product groups.
The battery-side owner map must include the economic operator responsible for data, conformity-document owners, notified-body interactions where relevant, waste-battery or producer-responsibility owners, and teams managing battery state or end-of-life data.
Article 78 identifies the responsible economic operator for battery passport data storage and processing controls.
economic operator responsible
Assign a shared DPP platform owner, but keep legal accountability per regime. Platform ownership should not blur who can introduce, modify, verify, publish, or retain each data field.
ESPR non-compliance risk is tied to failure to meet applicable ecodesign requirements or responsible economic-operator obligations once requirements apply. Market surveillance and customs roles matter, especially for imported products and DPP existence or authenticity checks.
Commission overview explains that DPPs can help customs authorities perform automatic checks on existence and authenticity.
custom authorities to perform automatic checks
The Batteries Regulation contains its own market-surveillance route for non-compliant batteries or batteries presenting a risk, including evaluation by authorities, corrective action, withdrawal, recall, and Union safeguard procedures.
Articles 79 to 81 ground battery-specific market surveillance, corrective action, withdrawal, recall, and safeguard procedures.
withdraw it from the market, or to recall it
Incident response should identify the affected regime before choosing the action path. A battery recall, ESPR DPP correction, customs issue, or product-group ecodesign non-conformity can involve different notices, evidence, and owners.
ESPR is a framework. It establishes the legal architecture for ecodesign requirements and a DPP, then relies on product-group delegated acts or related implementing measures to turn that framework into concrete requirements.
Commission overview explains that ESPR product rules are developed product-by-product or horizontally after prioritisation and consultation.
framework legislation that lays the foundation
The Batteries Regulation is already battery-specific. It sets requirements directly for batteries and waste batteries, including conformity assessment, technical documentation, EU declarations of conformity, waste-battery obligations, and the .
Primary Batteries Regulation source for battery-specific conformity, passport, waste, and market-surveillance obligations.
concerning batteries and waste batteries
Do not run one generic sustainability workstream for both. ESPR planning should watch delegated acts and product-group rules; battery planning should map the actual battery category, documentation, passport, and waste obligations in Regulation (EU) 2023/1542.
The guidance distinguishes ESPR product-group delegated acts from the already specified battery information requirements in the Batteries Regulation.
specific delegated act
Scope boundary
ESPR
ESPR broadly covers physical goods placed on the EU market or put into service, including components and intermediate products, with listed exclusions such as food, feed, medicinal products, living organisms, and certain vehicle aspects covered by sector-specific law.
Article 1 identifies the broad physical-goods scope and exclusions.
applies to any physical goods
Batteries Regulation
The Batteries Regulation applies to all battery categories, regardless of shape, volume, weight, design, material composition, chemistry, use, or purpose, including batteries incorporated into or added to products. It excludes equipment connected with essential Member State security interests, arms and war material except products not intended for specifically military purposes, and equipment designed to be sent into space.
The regulation is the cited source for the battery and waste-battery scope side of this page.
batteries and waste batteries
Operational implication
Create two scope records: one for the product or product group under ESPR, and one for the battery, battery model, or waste-battery flow under the Batteries Regulation. For a product containing a battery, test both regimes; neither scope conclusion answers the other.
Commission page confirms ESPR extends beyond energy-related products to nearly all physical products, while product-specific rules still need implementation.
virtually all physical products
Covered actors
ESPR
ESPR assigns duties to manufacturers, authorised representatives, importers, distributors, dealers, fulfilment service providers, and other economic operators according to their role and the applicable delegated act. It also gives online marketplaces and search engines cooperation duties and creates separate unsold-goods duties for covered economic operators.
Commission overview explains that ESPR product rules are developed product-by-product or horizontally after prioritisation and consultation.
framework legislation that lays the foundation
Batteries Regulation
The Batteries Regulation assigns product duties to battery manufacturers, authorised representatives, importers, distributors, fulfilment service providers, and other economic operators. Its end-of-life chapter separately regulates producers and producer-responsibility organisations, distributors, end-users, collection points, treatment operators, recyclers, and public waste-management actors.
Primary Batteries Regulation source for battery-specific conformity, passport, waste, and market-surveillance obligations.
concerning batteries and waste batteries
Operational implication
Map the legal role for each obligation. A company may be a manufacturer or importer for conformity duties, a producer for extended producer responsibility, and the operator placing the battery on the market for passport duties; those labels are not interchangeable.
The guidance distinguishes ESPR product-group delegated acts from the already specified battery information requirements in the Batteries Regulation.
specific delegated act
Requirement families
ESPR
ESPR defines ecodesign requirements as performance or information requirements. Product-group rules can address durability, reparability, energy and resource efficiency, substances that inhibit circularity, recycled content, remanufacturing, recycling, carbon footprint, environmental footprint, waste, and sustainability information.
Commission overview lists examples of ESPR requirement areas such as durability, reparability, recycled content, footprints, and waste.
performance and information rules
Batteries Regulation
The Batteries Regulation uses battery-specific requirement families, including carbon-footprint and recycled-content documentation, performance and durability parameters, labelling and marking, conformity documentation, due-diligence information, waste-battery information, and passport access rules.
Annex XIII and conformity-assessment provisions ground the battery-side examples used in this row.
INFORMATION TO BE INCLUDED IN THE BATTERY PASSPORT
Operational implication
Map data fields by obligation, not by label. A recycled-content or carbon-footprint data point may appear in both programs, but the calculation method, document owner, verifier, access level, and update trigger can differ.
Technical documentation provisions require evidence supporting carbon-footprint values and recycled-content share for relevant batteries.
evidence and information determining the input data
Core obligations
ESPR
Under ESPR, a DPP is a set of product-specific data identified in the applicable delegated act and accessible electronically through a data carrier. ESPR DPP content is therefore product-group dependent until a delegated act fixes it.
The guidance states that legally required ESPR DPP content may vary by product group and delegated act.
may vary depending on the product group
Batteries Regulation
The has a defined Batteries Regulation structure. Annex XIII separates public model information, restricted model information, information for notified bodies and authorities, and individual-battery data such as performance, state of health, status, and use-related records.
Annex XIII grounds the battery passport information categories and access tiers.
accessible only to persons with a legitimate interest
Operational implication
Build a shared passport architecture only at the platform layer: identifiers, data carriers, access control, auditability, and retention can be common services. The actual fields and access rights must remain regulation-specific until a source says they match.
CWA guidance supports treating DPP design as an information-system design problem with regulatory access and audience constraints.
technical, semantic and organisational aspects
Evidence record
ESPR
For ESPR, keep the product-scope conclusion, applicable delegated act or working-plan reference, requirement mapping, DPP design decision, data-carrier approach, access-rights rationale, supplier-data source, and change log for each product group.
ESPR definitions and DPP provisions ground the evidence categories for product-scope, information requirements, data carriers, and delegated-act mapping.
information specified in the applicable delegated act
CWA guidance supports maintaining DPP design records for audiences, access, product levels, and regulatory information needs.
target audience should be taken into consideration
Batteries Regulation
For batteries, keep battery-model identification, passport field mapping to Annex XIII, technical documentation, EU declaration of conformity, carbon-footprint and recycled-content support where applicable, access-rights decisions, and evidence for any waste or status change record.
Annex XIII and conformity-assessment provisions ground the battery passport and evidence examples in this row.
results of test reports proving compliance
Operational implication
A shared evidence repository is useful only if it preserves the source, article or annex, product or battery model, data owner, date, validation method, and audience for every reused record.
Battery technical documentation provisions require records that enable conformity assessment and authority review.
technical documentation shall specify the applicable requirements
Timing and deadlines
ESPR
ESPR entered into force on 18 July 2024. The Commission overview says the first ESPR and Energy Labelling Working Plan was adopted in April 2025 and that product rules will be developed after prioritisation, impact assessment, Ecodesign Forum work, and consultations.
no specific product information requirements are available
Batteries Regulation
The Batteries Regulation applies generally from 18 February 2024, subject to provision-specific dates. From 18 February 2027, each , each industrial battery with capacity greater than 2 kWh, and each electric-vehicle battery placed on the market or put into service must have a . Portable batteries and industrial batteries at or below 2 kWh are not brought into Article 77 merely because another battery category needs a passport.
Articles 77 and 96 establish the 18 February 2027 passport start for LMT batteries, industrial batteries above 2 kWh, and electric-vehicle batteries, and the regulation's general application from 18 February 2024.
From 18 February 2027
Operational implication
Use separate date registers. For ESPR, distinguish the non-binding planning signal from the delegated act's entry into force and application date; Article 4 generally requires at least 18 months before application unless a stated exception applies. For batteries, record the category, capacity where relevant, each provision-specific date, the 18 February 2027 Article 77 start date, and any later act that changes a method or format.
Commission DPP consultation source supports treating DPP implementation details as a developing workstream rather than fixed across all product groups.
Digital Product Passport
Operational ownership
ESPR
ESPR implementation typically needs product compliance, engineering, sustainability, supply-chain, marketplace, customs, and data-platform owners because requirements can affect product design, claims, DPP access, imported products, and market-surveillance evidence.
The battery-side owner map must include the economic operator responsible for data, conformity-document owners, notified-body interactions where relevant, waste-battery or producer-responsibility owners, and teams managing battery state or end-of-life data.
Article 78 identifies the responsible economic operator for battery passport data storage and processing controls.
economic operator responsible
Operational implication
Assign a shared DPP platform owner, but keep legal accountability per regime. Platform ownership should not blur who can introduce, modify, verify, publish, or retain each data field.
Article 78 restricts rights to access, introduce, modify, or update battery passport information according to access rights.
access, introduce, modify or update information
Market surveillance and corrective action
ESPR
ESPR non-compliance risk is tied to failure to meet applicable ecodesign requirements or responsible economic-operator obligations once requirements apply. Market surveillance and customs roles matter, especially for imported products and DPP existence or authenticity checks.
Commission overview explains that DPPs can help customs authorities perform automatic checks on existence and authenticity.
custom authorities to perform automatic checks
Batteries Regulation
The Batteries Regulation contains its own market-surveillance route for non-compliant batteries or batteries presenting a risk, including evaluation by authorities, corrective action, withdrawal, recall, and Union safeguard procedures.
Articles 79 to 81 ground battery-specific market surveillance, corrective action, withdrawal, recall, and safeguard procedures.
withdraw it from the market, or to recall it
Operational implication
Incident response should identify the affected regime before choosing the action path. A battery recall, ESPR DPP correction, customs issue, or product-group ecodesign non-conformity can involve different notices, evidence, and owners.
Battery market-surveillance provisions show why battery actions need a battery-specific response path.
non-compliant battery
Practical decision rule
ESPR
ESPR is a framework. It establishes the legal architecture for ecodesign requirements and a DPP, then relies on product-group delegated acts or related implementing measures to turn that framework into concrete requirements.
Commission overview explains that ESPR product rules are developed product-by-product or horizontally after prioritisation and consultation.
framework legislation that lays the foundation
Batteries Regulation
The Batteries Regulation is already battery-specific. It sets requirements directly for batteries and waste batteries, including conformity assessment, technical documentation, EU declarations of conformity, waste-battery obligations, and the .
Primary Batteries Regulation source for battery-specific conformity, passport, waste, and market-surveillance obligations.
concerning batteries and waste batteries
Operational implication
Do not run one generic sustainability workstream for both. ESPR planning should watch delegated acts and product-group rules; battery planning should map the actual battery category, documentation, passport, and waste obligations in Regulation (EU) 2023/1542.
The guidance distinguishes ESPR product-group delegated acts from the already specified battery information requirements in the Batteries Regulation.
specific delegated act
Practical decision rule
How should teams decide which workstream controls?
Use ESPR when the decision is about a product group, delegated act, ecodesign requirement, information requirement, DPP architecture, marketplace display, customs check, or ESPR working-plan watch item.
Use the Batteries Regulation when the decision is about a battery or waste battery, battery-model documentation, access tier, battery state or health information, conformity evidence, or battery-specific market-surveillance action.
Use a shared DPP platform only after documenting which fields are ESPR product data, which fields are data, which source controls each field, and who may update or disclose it.
Technical guidance used for DPP design distinctions and product-group-dependent ESPR DPP content.
DPP designer
1
Section 1
Operational consequences for DPP teams
The practical overlap is strongest at the DPP platform layer. Both regimes point toward structured product data, identifiers, access rights, reliability, integrity, and security. That supports one technical architecture, but it does not support one uncontrolled data model.
For ESPR, the decisive question is whether a product group has an applicable delegated act or concrete product rule that fixes the DPP content and ecodesign requirements. For batteries, the decisive question is whether the battery-side source already requires a passport record, technical file, declaration, access tier, or waste/status record.
Keep an ESPR delegated-act watchlist separate from the obligation register.
Design shared identifiers, data-carrier handling, access-control patterns, audit logs, and retention controls once, then bind fields to the controlling source.
Prevent marketing, sustainability, or product teams from copying fields into an ESPR DPP template unless the relevant ESPR delegated act or source supports the same field.
Article 78 grounds interoperability, access-rights, data storage, security, privacy, and fraud-prevention requirements for the battery passport.
data authentication, reliability and integrity
Recommended next step
Build the ESPR and battery passport crosswalk
Map each DPP or battery passport field to its source, owner, access tier, validation method, and update trigger before teams reuse evidence across regimes.
Classify the battery before designing a passport. Article 77 covers LMT batteries, industrial batteries with a capacity greater than 2 kWh, and electric-vehicle batteries from 18 February 2027. The record contains both battery-model information and information specific to the individual battery, including data resulting from use.
Access is tiered. Annex XIII includes public information, information reserved for notified bodies, market-surveillance authorities and the Commission, and information available to persons with a legitimate interest for specified repair, remanufacturing, second-life, recycling, or energy-market purposes. A public product page is therefore not an adequate substitute for the access model required by the Batteries Regulation.
Record the battery category and, for an industrial battery, its capacity before deciding whether Article 77 applies.
Map each Annex XIII field to the battery model or the individual battery and to the correct access tier.
Keep the unique identifier, data carrier, EU declaration of conformity reference, responsible economic operator, and change history linked to the same record.
Articles 77 and 78 and Annex XIII establish passport scope, model and individual-battery information, access tiers, the unique identifier, and responsibility for passport data.
3
Section 3
Limits on reusing passport evidence
ESPR DPP content depends on the applicable delegated act, while content is separately specified in the Batteries Regulation. Keep product-group dates, field lists, thresholds, and penalty analysis tied to the source governing the covered product or battery.
When a team needs a date, threshold, or field that is not listed here, check the law governing the product or battery. A rule can inform a shared architecture, but it does not establish an ESPR product-passport rule for textiles, electronics, furniture, or another product group.
Do not infer future ESPR product-group obligations from the .
Do not infer battery penalty or enforcement details from ESPR market-surveillance text.
Do not publish a DPP field list without linking each field to ESPR delegated acts, Annex XIII for batteries, or another cited source.
Primary source for Batteries Regulation claims, including battery passport technical design, Annex XIII fields, conformity evidence, waste-battery context, and market-surveillance procedures.
Article 78 grounds interoperability, access-rights, data storage, security, privacy, and fraud-prevention requirements for the battery passport.
Articles 77 and 78 and Annex XIII establish passport scope, model and individual-battery information, access tiers, the unique identifier, and responsibility for passport data.
Show 15 more
Annex XIII is the cited source for battery passport fields and access tiers used in this comparison.
The regulation is the cited source for the battery and waste-battery scope side of this page.
Primary Batteries Regulation source for battery-specific conformity, passport, waste, and market-surveillance obligations.
Annex XIII and conformity-assessment provisions ground the battery-side examples used in this row.
Technical documentation provisions require evidence supporting carbon-footprint values and recycled-content share for relevant batteries.
Annex XIII grounds the battery passport information categories and access tiers.
Article 78 requires the battery passport to be interoperable with other digital product passports required by Union eco-design law.
Annex XIII and conformity-assessment provisions ground the battery passport and evidence examples in this row.
Battery technical documentation provisions require records that enable conformity assessment and authority review.
Articles 77 and 96 establish the 18 February 2027 passport start for LMT batteries, industrial batteries above 2 kWh, and electric-vehicle batteries, and the regulation's general application from 18 February 2024.
Article 78 identifies the responsible economic operator for battery passport data storage and processing controls.
Article 78 restricts rights to access, introduce, modify, or update battery passport information according to access rights.
Articles 79 to 81 ground battery-specific market surveillance, corrective action, withdrawal, recall, and safeguard procedures.
Battery market-surveillance provisions show why battery actions need a battery-specific response path.
Primary source for the Batteries Regulation side, including Annex XIII battery passport content.
"battery passport"
More quoted passages
"data authentication, reliability and integrity"
"INFORMATION TO BE INCLUDED IN THE BATTERY PASSPORT"
"batteries and waste batteries"
"concerning batteries and waste batteries"
"evidence and information determining the input data"
"accessible only to persons with a legitimate interest"
"fully interoperable with other digital product passports"
"results of test reports proving compliance"
"technical documentation shall specify the applicable requirements"
Source for DPP implementation distinctions, product-group-dependent ESPR DPP content, and the limit on using battery passport fields as generic ESPR fields.
Guidance supports treating DPP implementation as a design activity involving audience, access, product levels, and product-group rules.
Guidance states legally required ESPR DPP content varies by product group and delegated act.
Show 7 more
The guidance distinguishes ESPR product-group delegated acts from the already specified battery information requirements in the Batteries Regulation.
The guidance states that legally required ESPR DPP content may vary by product group and delegated act.
CWA guidance supports treating DPP design as an information-system design problem with regulatory access and audience constraints.
CWA guidance supports maintaining DPP design records for audiences, access, product levels, and regulatory information needs.
Commission source for ESPR implementation sequencing, working-plan context, DPP purpose, customs relevance, and examples of ecodesign requirement areas.
Commission overview supports the source limit because concrete ESPR product rules follow later product-by-product or horizontal development.
Commission page confirms ESPR extends beyond energy-related products to nearly all physical products, while product-specific rules still need implementation.
Show 5 more
Commission overview explains that ESPR product rules are developed product-by-product or horizontally after prioritisation and consultation.
Commission overview lists examples of ESPR requirement areas such as durability, reparability, recycled content, footprints, and waste.
Commission timeline grounds ESPR entry into force on 18 July 2024 and the April 2025 working plan milestone.
Commission overview identifies consumers, manufacturers, authorities, and customs as DPP users or beneficiaries.
Commission overview explains that DPPs can help customs authorities perform automatic checks on existence and authenticity.
Primary source for ESPR scope, ecodesign requirement definitions, DPP definitions, delegated-act structure, and market-surveillance framing.
Article 1 identifies the broad physical-goods scope and exclusions.
Article 1 grounds ESPR as a framework for setting ecodesign requirements and establishing a digital product passport.
Show 5 more
Article 2 defines ecodesign, performance, and information requirements; Article 1 establishes the framework for those requirements.
Article 2 defines the DPP as data specified in the applicable delegated act and accessible through a data carrier.
ESPR definitions and DPP provisions ground the evidence categories for product-scope, information requirements, data carriers, and delegated-act mapping.
ESPR recitals and market-surveillance provisions ground the market-surveillance and customs distinction.
Primary source for ESPR scope, ecodesign requirements, DPP definitions, and delegated-act structure.
"establishes a digital product passport"
More quoted passages
"applies to any physical goods"
"establishes a framework for the setting of ecodesign requirements"
"performance requirement or an information requirement"
"accessible via electronic means through a data carrier"
"information specified in the applicable delegated act"
Commission source used only to support the statement that DPP implementation details remain an active implementation workstream.
Commission DPP consultation source supports treating DPP implementation details as a developing workstream rather than fixed across all product groups.