California Delete Act Data Broker Deletion Workflow
Beginning August 1, 2026, California data brokers must download, match, process, and report DROP deletion requests on a recurring 45-calendar-day cycle.
This workflow separates the binding Delete Act and DROP regulations from CalPrivacy's implementation guidance, and records list selection, hashing, outcomes, downstream instructions, and ongoing suppression.
A is a CCPA business that knowingly collects and sells to third parties personal information of consumers with whom it has no direct relationship, subject to statutory exclusions. Beginning August 1, 2026, a data broker must access DROP at least once every 45 calendar days, download every applicable consumer list, standardize and hash its own identifiers, process matches and nonmatches, report each status within 45 days of download, and repeat the cycle. This is a Delete Act workflow, not the ordinary CCPA deletion-request process for every business.
1
Section 1
How should a Data Broker Deletion Workflow run under the California CPRA?
Decide scope for each legal entity. Under the registration regulations, a direct relationship means that the consumer intentionally interacted with the business to obtain, access, buy, use, or request its products or services within the preceding three years. A rights request or identity-verification interaction does not create that relationship. A business may still be a when it has a direct relationship but sells information about that consumer that it did not collect directly.
Complete the applicable DROP account, registration, and fee steps, then select all six list types that can match the broker's holdings: name plus date of birth plus ZIP code, email, phone, mobile advertising ID, name plus VIN, and connected-TV identifier. Fewer lists are allowed only when identifiers across multiple lists lead to the exact same consumers in the broker's records.
For each download, standardize the broker's records, hash them under the current technical specification, and compare hashes locally. A match requires deletion of all non-exempt personal information and instructions to service providers and contractors, not only deletion of the submitted identifier. Where one matched identifier maps to multiple consumers, opt all linked consumers out of sale and sharing and direct downstream providers to do the same.
Report Deleted for a match followed by deletion of non-exempt data, Opted out for the shared-identifier outcome, Exempted only when matched information is exempt, and Not found only after the required matching process finds no match. CalPrivacy's processing page explains the technical steps but labels itself guidance; the Delete Act and regulations control if the guidance and binding text differ.
Record the last download time and schedule the next download no later than 45 calendar days later.
Select all identifier lists that can match the broker's holdings, unless the rules allow fewer because the lists would identify the exact same consumers.
Complete matching, deletion or opt-out, and status reporting within 45 days of download; the next download is also due within 45 days of the last download, so processing and the next cycle may overlap at the deadline.
For both matched and unmatched requests, retain only the minimum identifiers needed to screen newly collected records before sale or sharing; do not use that suppression record for another purpose.
If the broker later finds a match or another status changes, take the required action and update DROP within 45 days of detecting the change.
Retain list selection, download, standardization and hashing version, match evidence, deletion or opt-out evidence, downstream instructions, status-upload receipt, exemption basis, reviewer, and connection-failure or error notice.
What fields should the Data Broker Deletion Workflow template capture?
The data-broker privacy or DROP operations owner should maintain the record. It must support the recurring download-process-report cycle and show why each request received its status without retaining raw DROP identifiers or suppression data beyond what ongoing compliance needs.
Data-broker entity and scope evidence, registration year, DROP account, selected lists and list-selection rationale, integration method, download timestamp, batch ID, and next-download deadline.
Hashing and standardization version, internal datasets searched, match result, quality check, and responsible operator.
Deleted, opted-out, exempted, or not-found status; exemption provision when used; shared-identifier branch; completion time; and status-upload receipt.
Minimum ongoing suppression fields, newly collected record screen, service-provider and contractor instructions, later status change, 45-day update, connection-failure notice, reviewer, and evidence location.
How should teams review and improve the Data Broker Deletion Workflow?
Review every cycle for missed downloads, unselected identifier lists, failed normalization or hashes, partial dataset coverage, wrong status codes, incomplete downstream action, and records collected again after deletion. Re-test after changes to identifiers, matching logic, data stores, acquisitions, vendors, or the official DROP technical specification.
Compare the legal entity and direct-relationship analysis with the annual registration; a parent and subsidiary that independently meet the definition register separately.
Reconcile selected DROP lists to every identifier held, and document why an omitted list would match the exact same consumers as a selected list.
Test the full cycle in the DROP sandbox after hashing, identifier, or integration changes, then preserve production evidence without copying consumer identifiers into tickets.
Review suppression matching against newly collected records and confirm that a later match causes deletion and a status update within 45 days.
Turn California data broker deletion workflows into assigned work
This California Delete Act guide turns data broker deletion workflows into owners, evidence requests, review checkpoints, and reusable operating records in Sorena.