- UK government publication context for the statutory Age Appropriate Design Code laid before Parliament.
"the Secretary of State to lay the Code before Parliament"
The applies to information society services likely to be accessed by children. It sets 15 standards for designing and operating those services under UK data protection law.
Use this guide for implementation planning, not as a substitute for checking the consolidated UK GDPR, applicable Data Protection Act 2018 provisions, current ICO guidance, contracts, and the facts of the processing.
The is the ICO's statutory Age Appropriate Design Code for information-society services likely to be accessed by children. Its 15 standards guide how UK GDPR applies in this context; they are not a separate product certification. Scope turns on likely child access, not only whether the service says it is for adults.
Assess whether children are likely to access the service using audience data, content, design, marketing, comparable services, user research, and the effectiveness of any access restrictions. If they are, document the child's best interests, age assurance proportionality, default privacy, minimisation, geolocation, profiling, nudges, parental controls, transparency, and DPIA decisions.
The UK age of consent for an information-society service is 13 where consent is the Article 6 basis, but age 13 is not a general scope cutoff for the Code or for children's UK GDPR protections.
Sources (4)
Binding source for the age-13 consent rule and children's higher-protection matters in services likely to be accessed by children.
ICO statutory code source for Children's Code scope, design standards, DPIA, transparency, and child-user protection under UK data protection law.
ICO guidance confirming the Children's Code applies to information society services likely to be accessed by children, including non-UK companies where the UK GDPR territorial-scope conditions are met.
UK government publication context for the statutory Age Appropriate Design Code laid before Parliament.
the Secretary of State to lay the Code before Parliament
Use one row for each Code standard. The evidence prompts below are suggested implementation records, rather than additional legal requirements. For every row, record applicability, the live product behaviour, owner, evidence, any exception or compelling reason, approver, test result and monitoring trigger.
Sources (1)
The Code identifies the 15 standards; the evidence prompts translate the page's implementation fields into a standard-by-standard record.
The controller owns the Code assessment. Product, design, engineering, privacy, safety, research, and procurement should divide the implementation work by the decisions they control. A named senior owner should approve the scope conclusion, DPIA, defaults, exceptions, and remediation.
Evidence should show likely-access research, age ranges, best-interests analysis, lawful basis, age-assurance design, DPIA, notices, default-state tests, data minimisation and retention, sharing decisions, geolocation and profiling states, parental-control signals, nudge review, connected-device security, user-rights tools, monitoring, and changes.
Sources (4)
Binding source for material and territorial scope and the children's higher-protection matters in Article 25.
ICO guidance confirming the Children's Code applies to information society services likely to be accessed by children, including non-UK companies where the UK GDPR territorial-scope conditions are met.
UK government publication context for the statutory Age Appropriate Design Code laid before Parliament.
the Secretary of State to lay the Code before Parliament
ICO source for data-sharing controls that may be relevant when Children's Code decisions involve partners or onward sharing.
An adult-only label does not settle scope when children are likely to access the service. Conversely, not every offline product or non-commercial activity is an information society service. Record why the service qualifies and whether territorial scope reaches a non-UK provider processing UK children's data.
The Code explains compliance and must be taken into account by the ICO and courts where relevant, but it is not a separate certification or an automatic finding of breach. Other duties under UK GDPR, the Data Protection Act 2018, PECR, consumer law, and online-safety law may apply in parallel.
Sources (4)
ICO statutory code source for Children's Code scope, design standards, DPIA, transparency, and child-user protection under UK data protection law.
ICO guidance confirming the Children's Code applies to information society services likely to be accessed by children, including non-UK companies where the UK GDPR territorial-scope conditions are met.
UK government publication context for the statutory Age Appropriate Design Code laid before Parliament.
the Secretary of State to lay the Code before Parliament
ICO source for data-sharing controls that may be relevant when Children's Code decisions involve partners or onward sharing.
Use a standard-by-standard control record. For each of the 15 standards, record applicability, the product behaviour, owner, evidence, exception or compelling reason, approver, test result, and monitoring signal. Link the record to the DPIA and live release.
Reopen the assessment when the audience, design, recommendation or advertising logic, data fields, sharing, geolocation, profiling, parental controls, connected device, age assurance, or child-use evidence changes.
Sources (3)
ICO statutory code source for Children's Code scope, design standards, DPIA, transparency, and child-user protection under UK data protection law.
ICO guidance confirming the Children's Code applies to information society services likely to be accessed by children, including non-UK companies where the UK GDPR territorial-scope conditions are met.
UK government publication context for the statutory Age Appropriate Design Code laid before Parliament.
the Secretary of State to lay the Code before Parliament
Record likely access, age ranges, the DPIA, each of the 15 standards, live evidence, exceptions, approvals, tests and change triggers.
Create likely-access, DPIA and standard-by-standard evidence questions with owners and reviewers.
Use Research Copilot to answer follow-up questions with cited source material.
Review scope, evidence, owners, and the next compliance actions with Sorena.
"the Secretary of State to lay the Code before Parliament"
"Headings highlighted green are required areas of documentation under Article 30 of the GDPR"
Decide whether a UK personal data breach must be reported to the ICO, when the 72-hour clock starts, what the report must contain, and when individuals must be told.
Use UK transfer approval regulations by checking the destination, recipient, data, sector, effective status, scope limits, and review evidence.
Current UK GDPR rules for significant solely automated decisions, meaningful human involvement, Article 22B restrictions, and Article 22C safeguards.
Apply the UK GDPR material and territorial scope tests to one processing activity, including exclusions, non-UK organisations, roles, and evidence.
Build UK GDPR Article 30 records for controller and processor activities, apply the narrow under-250 exception, and keep the records current and available to the ICO.
Decide whether a personal data breach must be reported to the ICO or communicated to individuals, with deadlines, exceptions, content, and evidence.
Run a UK GDPR personal data breach workflow from containment and awareness through risk assessment, ICO reporting, individual notice, and the breach record.
Apply UK GDPR children's protections and the Age Appropriate Design Code to online services likely to be accessed by children.
A verifiable UK GDPR checklist for scope, lawful processing, transparency, rights, governance, security, breaches, DPIAs, children, and transfers.
Answer common UK GDPR questions on scope, lawful basis, records, DPIAs, DPOs, rights, breaches, children, automated decisions, and international transfers.
Build a UK GDPR compliance programme around processing records, lawful decisions, rights operations, security, incidents, DPIAs, suppliers, and transfers.
Decide whether each party is a controller, joint controller, or processor under the UK GDPR, then record the role-specific duties, contract terms, and evidence.
Operate UK GDPR access, rectification, erasure, restriction, portability, objection, and automated-decision rights under the amended Article 12 timing rules.
Track UK GDPR deadlines for rights requests, privacy information, breach notification, DPIAs, and ICO prior consultation, with triggers and exceptions.
Screen UK GDPR processing for likely high risk, complete the required DPIA analysis before processing, reduce risk, and consult the ICO when high residual risk remains.
Decide when the UK GDPR requires a DPIA or DPO, what each must cover, when to consult the ICO, and what evidence to retain.
Run a UK subject-access workflow using the current Article 12A clock, reasonable identity and clarification steps, proportionate searches, exemptions, redactions, and response evidence.
Choose the UK IDTA or Addendum, complete the current Article 46 data protection test, add needed measures, and maintain evidence for restricted transfers.
Choose among the six familiar Article 6 bases and the UK's recognised legitimate interests basis, then document any Article 9 or 10 condition.
UK GDPR and PECR cookie guidance with practical consent, exemption, evidence, and cited implementation decisions.
Understand the UK GDPR £8.7 million or 2% and £17.5 million or 4% fine ceilings, which infringements fall into each band, and how the ICO sets a fine.
Map UK GDPR requirements by processing activity, role, lawful basis, data type, risk, rights, suppliers, automated decisions, and transfers.
Apply the UK GDPR restricted-transfer sequence: map the transfer, check Article 45A approval, choose an Article 46 safeguard and assessment, or justify a specific Article 49 derogation.
Decide whether a UK restricted transfer exists, whether adequacy applies, how to use the IDTA or UK Addendum, and how to document the data protection test.
See when to use the UK GDPR, when the Data Protection Act 2018 adds a condition or exemption, and which regime covers law enforcement or intelligence processing.
Determine whether UK GDPR, EU GDPR, or both apply, then separate representatives, regulators, transfer routes, national law, and post-Brexit UK amendments.
Choose between the UK IDTA and EU SCCs with the UK Addendum, complete the right documents, and record the separate UK and EU transfer assessments.
Compare current UK and EU rules for recognised legitimate interests, rights requests, access searches, automated decisions, and international transfers.
Configure separate UK and EU privacy operations for representatives, regulator contacts, rights requests, breach reporting, transfer tools, and evidence.
Choose and document the UK GDPR lawful basis that fits each processing purpose, including recognised legitimate interest, in force since 5 February 2026.
Decide whether an online service is likely to be accessed by UK children and apply the ICO Children's Code standards to product design and personal-data use.
Decide whether a personal data breach must be reported to the ICO, when the 72-hour clock starts, what the report needs, and when affected people must be told.
Check whether current UK adequacy regulations cover a restricted transfer, including partial coverage for Canada, Japan, and the US UK Extension.
Apply the current UK rules for significant solely automated decisions, special-category restrictions, meaningful human involvement, and Article 22C safeguards.
See which controllers and processors need records of processing activities, what each record must contain, and how the under-250-employee exemption works.
Decide whether each party is a controller, joint controller, processor, or sub-processor, then record the contracts, responsibilities, and evidence the role requires.
Screen for likely high-risk processing, complete the Article 35 assessment before processing, and consult the ICO if high residual risk remains.
Apply the three UK GDPR DPO triggers and document expertise, independence, reporting line, resources, tasks, contacts, and conflict controls.
Decide when to use the UK IDTA or Addendum, complete the Article 46 data protection test, add supplementary measures, and keep the transfer under review.
Apply the current UK PECR rules to cookies and similar technologies, including consent, five exceptions, UK GDPR overlap, and evidence.