- Grounds the workflow requirement to keep the relied-upon ETSI deliverable PDF and checked source URL visible.
"ETSI deliver"
A practical tracker for recording which ETSI EN 303 645 and ETSI TS 103 701 versions support a consumer IoT security claim.
Grounded in ETSI deliverables and status-check links. Use it as implementation guidance, not for legal interpretation.
Structured answer sets in this page tree.
Cited legal and guidance references.
Use this tracker before reusing an ETSI EN 303 645 checklist, assessment pack, product claim, or procurement answer. The grounding confirms ETSI EN 303 645 V2.1.1 (2020-06) and ETSI TS 103 701 V2.1.1 (2025-05), while ETSI also warns that deliverables can be revised or change status. The practical job is to record the exact deliverable version, the assessment method version, the product boundary, and the date the ETSI status was checked.
The grounded ETSI EN 303 645 deliverable is V2.1.1 (2020-06), titled Cyber Security for Consumer Internet of Things: Baseline Requirements. Its history table records V1.1.1 as ETSI TS 103 645 in February 2019, EN approval and vote stages in 2019 and 2020, and V2.1.1 publication in June 2020.
The grounded ETSI TS 103 701 assessment document is V2.1.1 (2025-05), titled Cyber Security for Consumer Internet of Things: Conformance Assessment of Baseline Requirements. It specifies a conformance assessment methodology against ETSI TS 103 645 and ETSI EN 303 645, but the grounding does not prove that these are the latest ETSI deliverables on the day a visitor reads this page.
ETSI states that electronic or print versions can differ and that the prevailing ETSI deliverable is the PDF made publicly available through the ETSI deliver repository. The EN 303 645 grounding also tells users to check the current status of ETSI documents through ETSI deliverable-status information.
For a public product claim or customer answer, make the tracker show both the PDF version used and the independent status check. If the ETSI deliverable-status page, Search and Browse Standards, or deliver repository points to a newer or changed deliverable, update the evidence pack before repeating an older claim.
Use this tracker to keep standards versions, assessment methods, product boundaries, and public claims aligned before customer or assessor review.
Convert version checks into accountable tasks, evidence requests, and review milestones.
Use cited ETSI source material to resolve version, scope, applicability, and evidence questions before implementation.
Review standards versions, product boundaries, evidence owners, and the next compliance actions with Sorena.
A useful tracker is not just a list of URLs. It ties the standard version to the product or assessment boundary that depends on it. ETSI TS 103 701 frames the assessment around a Device Under Test, a Supplier Organization, a Test Laboratory, an ICS, an IXIT, and test groups that support assessment against ETSI TS 103 645 or ETSI EN 303 645.
For each product release or assessment pack, record the baseline requirement version, the assessment-method version, the DUT boundary, associated services, user documentation, evidence owner, and the specific public claim that will be made. That makes it clear when an updated ETSI deliverable or a product change requires a review.
Refresh the tracker when the source version changes, when ETSI status information changes, or when the product boundary no longer matches the evidence. EN 303 645 notes that software update management can involve associated service updates, device updates, and other service updates, and that transparency about update support is beneficial to consumers.
A refresh is also needed when an assessment method changes. TS 103 701 notes that ETSI TS 103 645 can be updated before ETSI EN 303 645 and that the assessment document scope lists compatible versions. That makes version alignment a first-order evidence issue, not a filing detail.
Use this workflow as a markdown-readable operating table in planning documents: Step | Owner | Evidence | Decision.
1 | Standards owner | ETSI EN 303 645 PDF version and status-check record | Which baseline requirements version supports the claim?
2 | Assessment owner | ETSI TS 103 701 PDF version and compatibility note | Which assessment method version will be used?
3 | Product owner | DUT, associated services, firmware, app, and support-period scope | Does the evidence boundary match the shipped product?
4 | Evidence owner | ICS, IXIT, conceptual tests, functional tests, external evidence, and exceptions | Can the claim be repeated without unsupported assumptions?
5 | Release owner | Change log and next review date | Should the public claim stay, narrow, or be refreshed?
The main mistake is overstating the evidence. A PDF publication date does not prove today's current status, and a completed checklist does not prove conformance if it omits the product boundary, assessment method, or changed associated services.
Another common mistake is mixing EN 303 645 baseline requirements and TS 103 701 assessment language without recording which versions were used. Keep those rows separate so teams can update one without silently invalidating the other.
"ETSI deliver"
"current status of this and other ETSI documents"
"may be subject to revision or change of status"
"Search and Browse Standards"
"Conceptual: Assessing conformity of the IXIT"