This page helps separate connected products, related services, product data, related-service data, metadata, readily available data, and excluded derived information before building access or sharing processes.
Use this classification aid with Regulation (EU) 2023/2854 and current European Commission guidance, then validate the result against the product architecture, contracts, and applicable law.
The Data Act Chapter II analysis starts with two questions: whether the object or software-service relationship is in the framework, and which generated data is product data or related-service data that is readily available with the metadata needed for use. Raw and pre-processed data will usually form the access package; inferred or derived information and content require a separate classification.
1
Section 1
What counts as a connected product within the scope of the EU Data Act?
A is not every digital device or every cloud service. The Regulation focuses on an item that obtains, generates, or collects data about its use or environment, can communicate product data through an electronic communications service, physical connection, or on-device access, and is not primarily used to store, process, or transmit data for someone other than the user.
That means the scope test should start from the physical item and its data path. Connected cars, health-monitoring devices, smart-home devices, aircraft, robots, industrial machines, agricultural machinery, smartphones, and TVs are examples in the Commission material, but the label is not enough; the item must generate or collect use, performance, or environment data and be able to communicate it.
Record the item, model or product family, firmware or embedded software, market configuration, and how data can leave the product.
Separate connected products from infrastructure the user does not own, rent, lease, or otherwise have contractual rights to use.
Do not treat servers, routers, or other products whose primary function is storing, processing, or transmitting data for another party as Chapter II connected products unless the user owns, rents, or leases them.
Mark prototypes and products not yet placed on the market separately because the Chapter II data-sharing analysis can differ.
Which dates and enterprise exclusions change the Chapter II result?
The Data Act generally applies from 12 September 2025. The Article 3(1) duty to design connected products and related services so data is accessible by default applies only to products and related services placed on the market after 12 September 2026. That delayed design duty is separate from the Article 4 and Article 5 request-based access rules.
Chapter II excludes data generated through products manufactured or designed, or related services provided, by qualifying microenterprises and small enterprises. The exclusion is lost where the enterprise has a partner or linked enterprise that is not micro or small, or is subcontracted to manufacture, design, or provide the product or service. Article 7 also gives a narrower temporary exclusion to a newly medium-sized enterprise and certain recently placed products.
Keep product placement date, manufacturer size, related-service provider size, partner and linked enterprises, and subcontracting status in the scope map.
Do not apply the Chapter II enterprise exclusion automatically to B2G, cloud switching, unfair-term, data-space, or smart-contract duties.
Do not label every product placed on the market by 12 September 2026 out of scope; the transition in Article 50 postpones Article 3(1), not all Chapter II duties.
Recheck the temporary medium-sized-enterprise position after the one-year periods in Article 7 expire.
Turn connected-product architecture, related services, data fields, metadata, exclusions, and safeguards into a maintained scope record before implementing user or third-party access.
When is software a related service that falls under the Data Act scope?
A related service is a digital service, including software, that is connected with the product at purchase, rental, or lease in a way that absence of the service would prevent one or more product functions, or that is later connected by the manufacturer or a third party to add to, update, or adapt the product's functions.
The practical test is whether the service affects the 's operation or behaviour. A washing-machine app that adjusts a cycle based on sensor data can be a related service. In the vehicle guidance, remote door locking, cockpit pre-conditioning, charging management, driver-preference syncing, and route optimisation shown on the dashboard are treated as examples of vehicle-related services.
Classify apps, software modules, cloud functions, and integrations by whether they add to, update, adapt, or control product functions.
Separate related services from analytics, consulting, insurance pricing, financial services, or offline repair work that only uses data and does not affect product operation.
Expect multiple data holders where a product maker and an app or service provider each obtain data from the same user relationship.
Attach the related-service contract and product-function dependency to the scope record.
Which product data and related service data are in scope of the Data Act?
Product data is data generated by use of the that the manufacturer designed to be retrievable by a user, data holder, or third party. Related-service data is data representing digitised user actions, inaction, or events related to the connected product during the provision of a related service.
Scope is field-level, not product-line-level. For each data stream, identify the event or sensor source, whether the data comes from the product or the related service, who can lawfully obtain it, and whether the user or a chosen third party needs metadata to interpret and use it.
Product data examples include sensor signals, status data, event logs, location, speed, pressure, temperature, liquid level, acceleration, and component condition where generated by product use.
Related-service data examples include app commands, service events, user settings, charging-management events, remote-control actions, and dashboard service interactions tied to the product.
Purely descriptive material in user manuals, packaging, or marketing copy is not product data for Chapter II access purposes, though Article 3 pre-contract information still matters.
For mixed datasets, flag personal-data fields separately because Data Act access and sharing must still comply with GDPR and ePrivacy conditions.
How should readily available data and metadata be classified under the Data Act?
Readily available data means product data and related-service data that the data holder lawfully obtains or can lawfully obtain from the or related service without disproportionate effort beyond a simple operation. The analysis should therefore cover both data already retrieved and data the architecture can lawfully retrieve without disproportionate effort.
Metadata is part of the access package when it is necessary to interpret and use the data. A useful metadata dictionary names units, timestamps, identifiers, sampling or collection frequency, format, quality limits, location or context fields, retention, and the source system that supplies the value.
Classify each field as directly accessible from the product, indirectly available through the data holder, lawfully retrievable but not currently stored, or not readily available.
Record the technical reason when a field cannot be obtained without disproportionate effort, such as architecture limits, transmission constraints, or data deleted before any party can access it.
Include metadata needed for practical use, not only schema labels; examples include units, time zone, sensor identity, calibration state, collection conditions, and quality notes.
Do not omit metadata protected as a trade secret from the analysis; identify protected metadata and the confidentiality measures needed if it must be shared.
Where is the Data Act line between raw, pre-processed, and derived data?
Chapter II covers raw and pre-processed data, plus metadata needed to make that data understandable and usable. Pre-processing can include preparing sensor output so it describes a physical quantity or quality, such as temperature, pressure, flow rate, audio, pH value, liquid level, position, acceleration, or speed.
Inferred or derived information is different. It is usually the result of additional investment, proprietary or complex algorithms, substantial transformation, sensor fusion that creates new insight, or analytics that assign new value beyond the underlying measurement. The data holder should still assess whether the underlying raw or pre-processed input data remains in scope.
Treat calibrated, normalised, reformatted, filtered, timestamped, unit-converted, or basic calculated measurements as potentially in scope when they still describe the underlying event or condition.
Treat predictions, proprietary scoring, behavioural profiles, object detection, complex diagnostics, and model-derived insights as candidates for the derived-data exclusion.
Do not use the word derived as a blanket exclusion for any data that passed through a pipeline; explain what new information or investment changes the classification.
Keep content such as films on a smart TV or creative audiovisual material separate from device-use telemetry such as brightness, battery, timestamps, location, and event logs.
What exclusions and safeguards should appear in the Data Act scope record?
A complete scope record should list data to share and explain excluded data, protected data, and conditions that may affect delivery. Tie each exclusion to a legal definition, guidance example, technical architecture fact, or protection measure.
Common exclusions or constraints include inferred or derived information, content protected by intellectual property rights, unavailable edge-processed data that no party can access, personal data without a valid processing basis, trade secrets needing confidentiality measures, security restrictions based on EU or national law, gatekeeper ineligibility for third-party access, and the ban on using accessed data to develop a competing .
For each excluded field, name the reason: not product data, not related-service data, not readily available, inferred or derived, content, personal-data constraint, trade secret, security restriction, or other law.
For each protected but shareable field, record the safeguard: access control, confidentiality terms, encryption, metadata marking, quality limits, recipient restrictions, or authority notification route.
For each third-party request path, check whether the recipient is eligible and whether the requested use could develop a competing .
Review the record when product architecture, related services, data pipelines, retrieval design, guidance, or contracts change.
What should the finished Data Act scope map for connected products contain?
Create a product-and-data scope map before product, legal, security, engineering, and support teams write notices, access portals, APIs, contracts, or helpdesk scripts. A reviewer should be able to trace each field from product architecture to Data Act classification.
Keep the map concise enough to maintain, but specific enough to stop overbroad exports and unsupported exclusions. The record should show the product or service, user relationship, data holder, data category, availability, metadata, safeguards, delivery route, source, owner, and review trigger.
Product/service fields: name, related service name, product function affected by the service, user type, data holder, recipient paths, and relevant contracts.
Data fields: source event or sensor, product data or related-service data classification, raw/pre-processed/derived label, readily available status, metadata needed, format, quality, and retention.
Exclusion fields: excluded category, cited reason, technical fact, safeguard or restriction, reviewer, and escalation path for trade-secret, security, or personal-data issues.
Maintenance fields: product owner, legal reviewer, engineering owner, last reviewed date, change trigger, and citation to the official source used for the classification.
Provides the data-in-scope factors that can be translated into scope-map columns: data category, availability, enrichment level, personal-data status, and trade-secret status.
Article 3 pre-contract information requirements and Articles 4-5 access duties support maintaining a field-level record of data types, formats, access means, metadata, and data holders.