Search every question across sub-FAQs

Materiality is the starting point for ESRS reporting. ESRS uses double materiality: a sustainability matter is material if it meets the criteria for impact materiality, financial materiality, or both. The assessment covers impacts, risks, and opportunities in the undertaking's own operations and upstream and downstream value chain.

Under the 2023 ESRS, materiality does not make ESRS 2 optional. ESRS 1 states that the undertaking always discloses the information required by ESRS 2 General Disclosures, regardless of the materiality-assessment outcome. When a topical sustainability matter is material, the undertaking then applies the relevant topical or sector-specific disclosure requirements and the ESRS 2 minimum disclosure requirements connected to policies, actions, metrics, and targets.

A useful ESRS 1 and ESRS 2 map starts with architecture, not with a list of copied datapoints. The reporting team should know which cross-cutting disclosures are always in scope, which topical matters are material, which value-chain impacts, risks, and opportunities are included, and where entity-specific disclosures are needed.

The map should also separate policies, actions, metrics, and targets. ESRS 2 contains minimum disclosure requirements for those categories, and topical standards can add topic-specific detail. This prevents teams from treating a target, a policy, and a metric as interchangeable evidence.

LSME was the original CSRD track for small and medium-sized undertakings, except micro-undertakings, whose securities were admitted to trading on an EU regulated market. The original framework allowed those undertakings to report specified SME information under proportionate standards. Directive (EU) 2026/470 removed listed-SME status as a standalone trigger from financial years beginning in 2027, so LSME now describes the earlier framework rather than a current route for every listed SME.

VSME is voluntary. Commission Recommendation (EU) 2025/1710 gives undertakings outside mandatory CSRD reporting a proportionate format for answering sustainability information requests. It is distinct from the Article 29ca voluntary standard that the Commission adopted on 3 July 2026.

The opt-out is part of the original listed-SME framework. The 2022 CSRD text allowed relevant small and medium-sized public-interest undertakings, for financial years starting before 1 January 2028, not to include sustainability information in the management report if they briefly explained why.

Do not apply that historical rule without the later amendments. Directive (EU) 2025/794 postponed the listed-SME application date, and Directive (EU) 2026/470 then removed listed-SME status as a standalone scope trigger from 2027. A current conclusion must use the amended thresholds and applicable national law.

A non-listed SME should use VSME as a voluntary response framework, not as a new mandatory CSRD obligation. The Commission says the voluntary standard is intended to reduce administrative burden by helping SMEs respond to sustainability information requests from large companies and financial institutions that are themselves subject to mandatory CSRD reporting.

Choose the module before collecting data. Under Commission Recommendation (EU) 2025/1710, the Basic Module contains B1 to B11 and covers general information plus environmental, social and business-conduct metrics. The Comprehensive Module adds information commonly requested by banks, investors and corporate customers and can be used only with the Basic Module. Once selected, a module is applied in full, while individual disclosures are provided only when they apply to the undertaking's circumstances.

Use the chosen module to standardize the SME's answers, keep repeatable evidence behind them, and avoid bespoke questionnaires expanding beyond what is proportionate for an SME. The Commission also encourages large companies and financial institutions seeking sustainability information from SMEs to base requests on the voluntary standard as far as possible.

Do not mix the two tracks. For a financial year governed by the original listed-SME transition, a listed SME needs a scope analysis covering the temporary opt-out and the standards then applicable. For financial years beginning in 2027, apply Directive (EU) 2026/470 instead: listing status alone is no longer a scope trigger. A non-listed SME outside mandatory scope usually needs a voluntary reporting and customer-request strategy, not a statement that CSRD directly applies to it.

Do not treat Commission Recommendation (EU) 2025/1710, an EFRAG draft, and the Article 29ca delegated standard as interchangeable. The Commission adopted C(2026) 5011 final on 3 July 2026. Confirm the delegated regulation's scrutiny, Official Journal publication, entry into force, and applicable annex before treating it as the controlling standard.

Article 8 of the EU Taxonomy Regulation requires undertakings in the scope of the relevant Accounting Directive sustainability-reporting provisions to disclose how and to what extent their activities are associated with environmentally sustainable economic activities. For CSRD reporters, those disclosures are part of sustainability reporting rather than a separate marketing claim.

For a non-financial undertaking, the core Article 8 KPI work is to calculate and present the Taxonomy-aligned share of turnover, capital expenditure (CapEx), and operating expenditure (OpEx) using the Taxonomy disclosure regulation and templates. Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/73 permits specified eligibility and alignment assessments to be omitted below separate 10% turnover, CapEx or OpEx thresholds, and permits all OpEx assessment to be omitted when OpEx is not material to the business model. Amounts covered by those derogations must be reported separately as non-material; where all OpEx assessment is omitted, the undertaking must disclose the total OpEx denominator and explain why OpEx is not material to its business model. The CSRD connection is that the sustainability report includes those Article 8 disclosures. Directive (EU) 2026/470 states that marking-up is not required until the relevant rules are adopted through the European Single Electronic Format regulation.

They are related to ESRS reporting, but they are not ESRS datapoints calculated through ESRS double materiality. ESRS sets the sustainability-reporting baseline for CSRD reports, while Article 8 KPIs come from the EU Taxonomy disclosure framework and its delegated regulation.

The practical consequence is that the sustainability reporting owner should align presentation, controls, sign-off, and assurance readiness across ESRS and Article 8, but should not use ESRS materiality to omit or redesign required Article 8 KPI templates. Apply the separate Article 8 derogations where their conditions are met. For activities assessed for alignment, first classify each activity as a Taxonomy-eligible economic activity, then test whether it meets the criteria for a Taxonomy-aligned economic activity: substantial contribution, do-no-significant-harm criteria, minimum safeguards and technical screening criteria.

The 2024 Article 8 XBRL taxonomy is a digital representation of the Article 8 disclosure templates and related information requirements then in force. EFRAG states that it transposes the disclosure requirements into machine-readable format as technical support; it does not change the underlying EU Taxonomy KPI rules or, by itself, create a filing duty. Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2026/73 later replaced or amended several of those templates.

If digital tagging becomes applicable, use the taxonomy adopted for the reporting period. Prepare one mapping from source finance and activity data into the applicable Article 8 KPI templates, and another from the final disclosure tables and narrative context into the applicable taxonomy elements.

Keep evidence that proves the published KPI values, not just evidence that the report was reviewed. Article 8 KPIs are percentage disclosures built from financial amounts, Taxonomy activity assessments, and template rules, so the retained file should let a decision owner or assurance provider retrace the calculation.

A useful evidence pack separates non-financial undertaking KPI material from any financial-undertaking templates. Unless the reporting entity is a financial undertaking in scope of the relevant Article 8 annexes, avoid importing green asset ratio, asset manager, investment firm, or insurance-specific detail into the page or disclosure file.

The main risk is mixing three different layers: the legal KPI obligation, the ESRS sustainability-statement process, and the XBRL tagging layer. When those layers are merged into one generic checklist, teams can publish a plausible-looking sustainability section without a traceable KPI calculation or a reliable digital-tagging map.

Keep the layers distinct: Article 8 determines the KPI content and templates, CSRD and ESRS determine the sustainability-reporting package and governance context, and the applicable digital taxonomy supports machine-readable tagging of the final disclosures.