Search every question across sub-FAQs

ESRS 1 is the rulebook for how to read and apply the ESRS set. It explains the categories of standards, double materiality, value-chain reporting, time horizons, presentation of the sustainability statement, and concepts such as impacts, risks and opportunities.

ESRS 2 is the general disclosure standard. It tells an undertaking what information to provide at a general level across material sustainability matters, including governance, strategy, the process for identifying and assessing impacts, risks and opportunities, and the minimum disclosure requirements for policies, actions, metrics, and targets.

The ESRS architecture has three categories: cross-cutting standards, topical standards, and sector-specific standards. ESRS 1 and ESRS 2 are the cross-cutting standards and apply across the sustainability matters covered by topical and sector-specific standards.

Topical ESRS cover environmental, social, and governance topics. They add topic-specific disclosure requirements and may also include requirements that are applied together with ESRS 2 general disclosures. When a sustainability matter is material, the undertaking looks to the relevant topical or sector-specific ESRS and then applies the ESRS 2 minimum disclosure requirements for policies, actions, metrics, and targets where applicable.

Materiality is the starting point for ESRS reporting. ESRS uses double materiality: a sustainability matter is material if it meets the criteria for impact materiality, financial materiality, or both. The assessment covers impacts, risks, and opportunities in the undertaking's own operations and upstream and downstream value chain.

Materiality does not make ESRS 2 optional. ESRS 1 states that the undertaking always discloses the information required by ESRS 2 General Disclosures, regardless of the outcome of the materiality assessment. When a topical sustainability matter is material, the undertaking then applies the relevant topical or sector-specific disclosure requirements and the ESRS 2 minimum disclosure requirements connected to policies, actions, metrics, and targets.

A useful ESRS 1 and ESRS 2 map starts with architecture, not with a list of copied datapoints. The reporting team should know which cross-cutting disclosures are always in scope, which topical matters are material, which value-chain impacts, risks, and opportunities are included, and where entity-specific disclosures are needed.

The map should also separate policies, actions, metrics, and targets. ESRS 2 contains minimum disclosure requirements for those categories, and topical standards can add topic-specific detail. This prevents teams from treating a target, a policy, and a metric as interchangeable evidence.

LSME is the listed-SME track. The CSRD amends the Accounting Directive so that small and medium-sized undertakings, except micro-undertakings, whose securities are admitted to trading on an EU regulated market are in scope for sustainability reporting. Those undertakings may limit reporting to specified SME information and report under sustainability reporting standards for small and medium-sized undertakings.

VSME is the voluntary SME track. It is aimed at SMEs that are not subject to mandatory CSRD sustainability reporting but still need a proportionate way to answer sustainability information requests from large companies, financial institutions, customers, banks, investors, or other stakeholders.

The listed-SME opt-out matters only for SMEs in the CSRD listed-SME category. The CSRD text says that, for financial years starting before 1 January 2028, the relevant small and medium-sized public-interest undertakings may decide not to include the sustainability information in their management report.

That opt-out is not silent non-reporting. If used, the undertaking must briefly state in its management report why the sustainability reporting was not provided. A listed SME should therefore track whether it is relying on the opt-out, where the explanation appears, and when the opt-out window ends for its reporting calendar.

A non-listed SME should use VSME as a voluntary response framework, not as a new mandatory CSRD obligation. The Commission says the voluntary standard is intended to reduce administrative burden by helping SMEs respond to sustainability information requests from large companies and financial institutions that are themselves subject to mandatory CSRD reporting.

The practical use is to standardize the SME's answers, keep repeatable evidence behind them, and avoid bespoke questionnaires expanding beyond what is proportionate for an SME. The Commission also encourages large companies and financial institutions seeking sustainability information from SMEs to base requests on the voluntary standard as far as possible.

The main mistake is mixing the two tracks. A listed SME needs a CSRD scope and reporting analysis, including whether it can rely on the temporary opt-out and whether a proportionate listed-SME standard applies. A non-listed SME usually needs a voluntary reporting and customer-request strategy, not a statement that CSRD directly applies to it.

Teams should also avoid treating proposed or voluntary material as if it were already the same as binding CSRD reporting. The Commission's VSME Q&A says the future voluntary standard proposed under the Omnibus simplification package might differ from the current VSME Recommendation and depends on negotiations between co-legislators.

Article 8 of the EU Taxonomy Regulation requires undertakings in the scope of the relevant Accounting Directive sustainability-reporting provisions to disclose how and to what extent their activities are associated with environmentally sustainable economic activities. For CSRD reporters, those disclosures are part of sustainability reporting rather than a separate marketing claim.

For a non-financial undertaking, the core Article 8 KPI work is to calculate and present the Taxonomy-aligned share of turnover, capital expenditure, and operating expenditure using the Taxonomy disclosure regulation and templates. The CSRD connection is that the sustainability report must include those Article 8 disclosures and, where digital reporting applies, mark them up in the required electronic format.

They are related to ESRS reporting, but they are not ESRS datapoints calculated through ESRS double materiality. ESRS sets the sustainability-reporting baseline for CSRD reports, while Article 8 KPIs come from the EU Taxonomy disclosure framework and its delegated regulation.

The practical consequence is that the sustainability reporting owner should align presentation, controls, sign-off, and assurance readiness across ESRS and Article 8, but should not use ESRS materiality to omit or redesign required Article 8 KPI templates.

The Article 8 XBRL taxonomy is a digital representation of the Article 8 disclosure templates and related information requirements. EFRAG states that it transposes the Article 8 disclosure requirements into machine-readable format as technical support; it does not change the underlying EU Taxonomy KPI rules.

This matters for implementation because the report team needs two mappings: one from source finance and activity data into the Article 8 KPI templates, and one from the final disclosure tables and narrative context into the Article 8 XBRL taxonomy elements. The Article 8 taxonomy uses template structures, dimensions, text blocks, and KPI elements to support Inline XBRL tagging.

Keep evidence that proves the published KPI values, not just evidence that the report was reviewed. Article 8 KPIs are percentage disclosures built from financial amounts, Taxonomy activity assessments, and template rules, so the retained file should let a decision owner or assurance provider retrace the calculation.

A useful evidence pack separates non-financial undertaking KPI material from any financial-undertaking templates. Unless the reporting entity is a financial undertaking in scope of the relevant Article 8 annexes, avoid importing green asset ratio, asset manager, investment firm, or insurance-specific detail into the page or disclosure file.

The main risk is mixing three different layers: the legal KPI obligation, the ESRS sustainability-statement process, and the XBRL tagging layer. When those layers are merged into one generic checklist, teams can publish a plausible-looking sustainability section without a traceable KPI calculation or a reliable digital-tagging map.

Keep the layers distinct: Article 8 determines the KPI content and templates, CSRD and ESRS determine the sustainability-reporting package and governance context, and the Article 8 XBRL taxonomy supports machine-readable tagging of the final disclosures.