Use one traceable workflow from assessed risk to treatment option, necessary control, implementation action, residual-risk decision, and approval.
The register supports the risk-treatment plan but does not replace the SoA: keep risk actions and approvals linked to Annex A applicability, exclusions, status, and control evidence.
ISO/IEC 27001 requires documented risk-assessment results, a risk-treatment plan, risk-owner approval, acceptance of , and documented treatment results. It does not require a document named 'risk-treatment register.' Use this register format when one controlled record helps connect those required outputs from assessed risk through implementation and review.
1
Section 1
Which decisions belong in a risk-treatment register?
Begin with an assessed information security risk, its owner, level, and priority under the organization's documented criteria. Then capture the chosen treatment option, every necessary control, the Annex A completeness comparison, planned actions, owners, resources, target dates, and dependencies. ISO/IEC 27001 requires appropriate treatment options but does not prescribe labels such as reduce, avoid, share, or accept.
Obtain the risk owner's approval of the treatment plan and acceptance of the stated under Clause 6.1.3. If that decision assumes future controls, record the assumptions and projected result separately from the current risk. After implementation, retain treatment results, evaluate the remaining risk, and revisit acceptance if the result differs from the approved assumptions. Keep incomplete implementation actions open; revise treatment or escalate when the result exceeds the criteria or the owner refuses acceptance.
Keep treatment status distinct from risk status and control implementation status.
Link necessary controls to the SoA, including controls outside Annex A.
Record risk-owner approval, acceptance date, assumptions, and reassessment triggers.
Clauses 6.1.2 and 6.1.3 require documented risk assessment and treatment processes, necessary-control selection, the SoA, a treatment plan, risk-owner approval, and residual-risk acceptance.
Information security management systems — Requirements
The ISO/IEC 27002 standard page identifies the control-guidance standard used to connect risk treatment choices to practical control evidence.
Information security controls
2
Section 2
Which fields preserve the evidence chain?
Stable identifiers are a practical traceability control, not a prescribed ISO field. Use them to connect the assessment, treatment plan, SoA, implementation tickets, operating evidence, effectiveness result, and acceptance when those records live in different systems.
Preserve both planned and actual dates and both pre-treatment and residual ratings. That distinction prevents incomplete actions from appearing as completed risk reduction.
The ISO/IEC 27005 standard page identifies the risk-management guidance used to structure information-security risk assessment and treatment workflow decisions.
Guidance on managing information security risks
Recommended next step
Track treatment from assessment to acceptance
Assign actions, connect necessary controls to the SoA, retain implementation evidence, and record risk-owner approval and residual-risk acceptance.
How should teams route assessment, treatment, and approval?
The assessor applies the approved method and identifies the risk owner. The organization chooses who proposes treatment and implements controls. Clause 6.1.3 requires the risk owner to approve the treatment plan and accept the ; it does not prescribe a committee, assessor, or control-owner title.
Governance can set thresholds and escalation paths, but it should not erase accountability. A committee approval without a named risk owner does not satisfy the standard's explicit risk-owner approval and acceptance step.
Assessment gate: valid, comparable result and named owner.
Plan and acceptance gate: necessary controls, SoA impact, resources, deadlines, risk-owner plan approval, and acceptance of the stated and assumptions.
Implementation gate: retained treatment results and effectiveness evidence support the current residual-risk rating.
Review gate: reassess changed results or assumptions with the risk owner and record the next planned review.
The ISO/IEC 27005 standard page identifies the risk-management guidance used to structure information-security risk assessment and treatment workflow decisions.
ISO public listing for the ISMS requirements standard. Clauses 6.1.3, 8.3 and 10.2 respectively establish plan approval and residual-risk acceptance, implementation with retained treatment results, and the response to nonconformity; the public listing does not reproduce those clauses.
Information security management systems — Requirements
4
Section 4
Which register mistakes hide ownership or residual risk?
Common failures are using a generic 'security' owner, recording only the target rating, treating planned controls as implemented, or closing treatment without evidence and residual-risk acceptance.
Another failure is limiting controls to Annex A. Necessary controls can be designed by the organization or identified from any source. Annex A is then used to check whether a necessary control was overlooked.
Do not cite a standard title as evidence that a process is operating.
Recheck an old audit record after scope, service, supplier, or risk changes before using it as current evidence.
Do not hide exceptions; record them as risk acceptance, corrective action, or management-review inputs.
The ISO/IEC 27002 standard page identifies the control-guidance standard used to connect risk treatment choices to practical control evidence.
Information security controls
5
Section 5
Which events should reopen a treatment record?
ISO/IEC 27001 requires risk assessment at planned intervals and when significant changes are proposed or occur. Reopen the register entry when that assessment changes the risk result or when scope, assets, suppliers, threats, vulnerabilities, incidents, controls, or implementation evidence invalidate the recorded decision.
Preserve the old rating and approval as history, calculate the current consistently, and route changed treatment or acceptance decisions to the accountable risk owner.
Set a review date and a change-trigger rule.
Track nonconformities through correction, cause evaluation, needed corrective action, and effectiveness review. Record related residual-risk acceptance separately; it does not close a failure to meet a requirement.
Use management review to decide needed ISMS changes and improvement actions, including resources, scope, risk criteria, or evidence controls where relevant.
ISO public listing for the ISMS requirements standard. Clauses 6.1.3, 8.3 and 10.2 respectively establish plan approval and residual-risk acceptance, implementation with retained treatment results, and the response to nonconformity; the public listing does not reproduce those clauses.
Information security management systems — Requirements
The ISO/IEC 27005 standard page identifies the risk-management guidance used to structure information-security risk assessment and treatment workflow decisions.
ISO public listing for the ISMS requirements standard. Clauses 6.1.3, 8.3 and 10.2 respectively establish plan approval and residual-risk acceptance, implementation with retained treatment results, and the response to nonconformity; the public listing does not reproduce those clauses.
Clauses 6.1.2 and 6.1.3 require documented risk assessment and treatment processes, necessary-control selection, the SoA, a treatment plan, risk-owner approval, and residual-risk acceptance.
This source is the governing requirements context for ISO/IEC 27001 scope, control governance, and review cadence in ISMS operations.
"Information security management systems — Requirements"
The ISO/IEC 27005 standard page identifies the risk-management guidance used to structure information-security risk assessment and treatment workflow decisions.