We use privacy-by-default, cookieless analytics.

Optional analytics cookies are used only if you accept them.

Read our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

FAQGlobalISO/IEC 27001

ISO/IEC 27001 FAQ Management Review

What must an ISO/IEC 27001 management review cover, decide, and retain?

Use the required inputs to produce recorded decisions on improvement and needed ISMS changes, with owners and follow-up rather than meeting minutes alone.

Back to main artifactReview sources
Author
Sorena AI
Published
May 9, 2026
Updated
Jul 24, 2026
Questions
4

Structured answer sets in this page tree.

Primary sources
3

Cited legal and guidance references.

Publication metadata
Sorena AI
Published May 9, 2026
Updated Jul 24, 2026
Overview

must review the ISMS at planned intervals to ensure its continuing suitability, adequacy, and effectiveness. The review must consider the inputs listed in Clause 9.3.2, produce decisions about continual-improvement opportunities and needed ISMS changes, and leave documented evidence of the results.

Search this module

Find a question or answer quickly

4 of 4 questions
Question 1

What must management review cover?

Clause 9.3 requires to review the ISMS at planned intervals for continuing suitability, adequacy, and effectiveness. It is a leadership review of the management system, not a security-team status meeting delegated without management participation.

The must cover previous-review actions; relevant changes in internal and external issues and interested-party needs; performance trends for nonconformities and corrective actions, monitoring and measurement, audit results, and objective fulfilment; interested-party feedback; risk-assessment results; risk-treatment-plan status; and continual-improvement opportunities.

  • Use the Clause 9.3.2 inputs as a complete agenda, while adding organization-specific topics where useful.
  • Show which members of participated and which ISMS scope the review covered.
  • Bring unresolved audit findings, overdue treatments, objective performance, and material context changes to the review with the decision or escalation needed.
  • For each trend, show the period, measure, target or comparison basis, result, interpretation, and decision needed. A list of metrics without analysis does not show that evaluated ISMS performance.
Citations
ISO/IEC 27001:2022 standard page

ISO/IEC 27001:2022 clauses 9.3.1 and 9.3.2 require top-management review at planned intervals and list the inputs the review must consider.

ISO/IEC 27002:2022 standard page

ISO/IEC 27002:2022 may help interpret control-performance information presented to management, while ISO/IEC 27001 supplies the review requirements.

Recommended next step

Track management-review actions

Bring the required inputs to top management, record decisions on improvement and ISMS changes, and assign each follow-up action.

Assessment workflow
Open Assessment Autopilot for ISO/IEC 27001

Collect review inputs, record decisions, and track owners and due dates.

Explore next step
Talk to Sorena
Talk through implementation

Review your current scope, evidence gaps, and next implementation steps.

Explore next step
Question 2

What must the review produce and retain?

The must include decisions on continual-improvement opportunities and any needed ISMS changes under Clause 9.3.3. The standard requires evidence of the results, not a particular meeting format or document called 'minutes.'

Retain controlled documented information showing what reviewed and decided. Date, participants, scope, inputs, decisions, actions, owners, target dates, and links to affected risk, treatment, objective, corrective-action, or change records make that evidence usable.

  • Record resource, scope, objective, risk, treatment, corrective-action, and improvement decisions explicitly.
  • Carry each action into the system where it will be owned and tracked; do not leave it only in meeting minutes.
  • At the next review, report the status of earlier actions because that status is itself a required input.
  • Example outcomes include funding a treatment, changing an objective after evidence shows it is ineffective, expanding or narrowing ISMS scope through the controlled scope process, requiring a corrective action, or deciding that no ISMS change is needed and recording why.
Citations
ISO/IEC 27001:2022 standard page

ISO/IEC 27001:2022 clause 9.3.3 requires decisions on continual-improvement opportunities and needed ISMS changes and documented evidence of management-review results.

Question 3

Who owns management review decisions?

owns the review. ISMS, risk, audit, privacy, technology, legal, supplier, or service teams can prepare inputs and own resulting actions, but their attendance does not replace top management's responsibility to review the system.

Assign each resulting action to someone with authority and resources to complete it. Risk owners still approve the risk-treatment plan and accept residual information security risk under Clause 6.1.3; should not silently overwrite those accountable decisions.

  • Name the top-management chair or accountable decision maker in the retained record.
  • Separate authors of input reports from the leaders making resource and ISMS-change decisions.
  • Route residual-risk acceptance to the identified risk owner and preserve that approval with the treatment record.
Citations
ISO/IEC 27001:2022 standard page

ISO/IEC 27001:2022 clauses 9.3 and 6.1.3 distinguish top management's review duty from the risk owner's approval of the treatment plan and acceptance of residual risk.

Question 4

How often should management review happen?

ISO/IEC 27001 requires planned intervals but does not prescribe a universal annual, quarterly, or monthly cadence. Set a cadence that gives timely oversight of the scoped ISMS and document it in the management-system schedule.

Material incidents, acquisitions, scope changes, important supplier changes, repeated nonconformities, failed objectives, or major risk changes can justify an additional review or an earlier decision forum even when the next planned review is not due.

  • Define the planned cadence, accountable organizer, required participants, and input cutoff.
  • Set event triggers for extraordinary reviews or interim decisions.
  • Do not claim that ISO/IEC 27001 itself mandates an annual review; that cadence is an organizational choice unless another obligation sets it.
Citations
ISO/IEC 27002:2022 standard page

ISO/IEC 27002:2022 provides control guidance that may help determine whether a control change or failure warrants an interim leadership decision.

Primary sources

References and citations

ISO/IEC 27001:2022 standard page
iso.org
Referenced sections
  • ISO/IEC 27001:2022 clause 9.3.1 requires planned intervals without prescribing a universal annual, quarterly, or monthly cadence.
"Information security management systems — Requirements"
ISO/IEC 27002:2022 standard page
iso.org
Referenced sections
  • ISO/IEC 27002:2022 provides control guidance that may help determine whether a control change or failure warrants an interim leadership decision.
"Information security controls"
ISO/IEC 27005:2022 standard page
iso.org
Referenced sections
  • ISO/IEC 27005:2022 provides risk-management guidance that may inform risk-assessment and treatment-status inputs.
"Guidance on managing information security risks"
Related guides

Explore more topics

ISO/IEC 27001 Annex A Control Evidence Guide
Build useful ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A control evidence: selected controls, SoA rationale, owners, implementation proof, effectiveness checks, audit records, and improvement actions.
ISO/IEC 27001 Annex A Control Ownership FAQ
How to assign practical owners for ISO/IEC 27001 Annex A controls without confusing control ownership with the standard's required risk-owner accountability.
ISO/IEC 27001 Audit Readiness Guide
Prepare ISO/IEC 27001 audit evidence across ISMS scope, risk assessment, risk treatment, Statement of Applicability, Annex A controls, internal audit, management review, and corrective actions.
ISO/IEC 27001 Certification Body Evidence FAQ
What ISO/IEC 27001 certification auditors may sample, how to connect requirements to operating evidence, and what the certification body does not own.
ISO/IEC 27001 Certification Stage Workflow
Plan optional ISO/IEC 27001 certification from scope readiness through Stage 1, Stage 2, findings, certification decision, surveillance, and recertification.
ISO/IEC 27001 Compliance Guide: ISMS Evidence
Build ISO/IEC 27001:2022 conformity evidence for ISMS scope, leadership, risk assessment and treatment, the Statement of Applicability, operations, audits, management review, and corrective action.
ISO/IEC 27001 FAQ: ISMS Scope, Risk and SoA
Practical ISO/IEC 27001 FAQ covering ISMS scope, risk assessment, risk treatment, Statement of Applicability, Annex A controls, certification evidence, audits, management review, and surveillance readiness.
ISO/IEC 27001 Implementation Roadmap Guide
A practical ISO/IEC 27001:2022 roadmap from context and scope through risk treatment, the SoA, control operation, internal audit, management review, corrective action, and optional certification.
ISO/IEC 27001 Internal Audit and Management Review Guide
Keep ISO/IEC 27001 internal audit and management review distinct and connected: independent audit evidence, top-management decisions, corrective actions, resources, and improvement records.
ISO/IEC 27001 Internal Audit FAQ
How should teams run ISO/IEC 27001 internal audits: who should own each step, what evidence is expected, and how findings are resolved.
ISO/IEC 27001 Requirements Guide
Plain-language guide to ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Clauses 4-10: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement, and Annex A control selection.
ISO/IEC 27001 Risk Acceptance FAQ
How ISO/IEC 27001 risk acceptance works: criteria, risk-owner approval, residual-risk evidence, external obligations, and reassessment triggers.
ISO/IEC 27001 Risk Treatment and Residual Risk Guide
Connect ISO/IEC 27001 risk-treatment choices, necessary controls, the treatment plan, Statement of Applicability, residual-risk acceptance, owners, evidence, and review triggers.
ISO/IEC 27001 Risk Treatment Register Workflow
Build an ISO/IEC 27001 risk-treatment register that links assessed risks to treatment options, controls, SoA entries, actions, owners, residual-risk approval, evidence, and review triggers.
ISO/IEC 27001 SoA Exclusions FAQ
How should teams justify Statement of Applicability exclusions under ISO/IEC 27001? Practical answer with owners, evidence, review triggers, and external source references.
ISO/IEC 27001 SoA: workflow for gathering and documenting control evidence
Operate the ISO/IEC 27001 Statement of Applicability as a live evidence index linking necessary controls, Annex A inclusion and exclusion rationale, implementation status, owners, and proof.
ISO/IEC 27001 Statement of Applicability template: Annex A control selection and justification
Practical ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Statement of Applicability template fields for necessary controls, Annex A applicability, inclusion and exclusion rationale, status, owners, evidence, and review history.
ISO/IEC 27001 Surveillance Audits FAQ
What ISO/IEC 27001 surveillance audits check, how they differ from internal audit and recertification, and what evidence to maintain between audits.
ISO/IEC 27001 vs NIS2 Comparison
Compare voluntary ISO/IEC 27001 ISMS conformity and optional certification with NIS2 legal duties, entity scope, management accountability, incident reporting, supervision, and penalties.
ISO/IEC 27001 vs NIST CSF 2.0 Comparison
Compare ISO/IEC 27001:2022's certifiable ISMS requirements with NIST CSF 2.0's cybersecurity outcomes, Profiles, Tiers, Functions, evidence uses, and adoption choices.
ISO/IEC 27001 vs SOC 2 Comparison
Compare ISO/IEC 27001 certification with SOC 2 examination reports: criteria, scope, assurance period, auditor and certification-body roles, deliverables, evidence reuse, and claim limits.