Search every question across sub-FAQs

Article 6 treats an EU-targeted offer as making available on the market. The practical indicators include dispatch to EU locations, languages used for the offer or ordering, payment methods, and other facts showing activities directed to a Member State.

Do not treat website accessibility by itself as enough. The Regulation and Blue Guide both frame this as a case-by-case assessment, so keep screenshots or exports showing the actual listing, shipping destinations, ordering language, checkout path, currency or payment options, and marketplace seller identity at the time the offer was live.

For Article 4 product categories, the product may be placed on the EU market only if there is an economic operator established in the Union responsible for the Article 4 tasks. Depending on the supply chain, that operator can be an EU manufacturer, importer, authorised representative with the required written mandate, or an EU fulfilment service provider where no other listed operator is established in the Union.

The responsible operator's name or registered trade name or trademark, contact details, and postal address must be indicated on the product, packaging, parcel, or accompanying document. For online listings, keep evidence that the same operator is connected to the exact product units being offered, not just to the brand or seller account in general.

Keep the conclusion narrow. An EU-targeting review can show that an offer is likely treated as made available on the EU market; it does not prove the product is substantively compliant with every applicable harmonised act. Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 has applied from 16 July 2021, while the exact listing information and conformity duties also depend on the applicable product legislation and any separate platform law.

Likewise, Article 4 evidence shows there is an EU-established operator for specified documentation and cooperation tasks. It is not a substitute for conformity assessment, accurate warnings, correct CE marking where required, or product-specific technical documentation.

The MSR's online-interface power is narrow. Under Article 14, an authority may require removal of product content or a warning only where no other effective means can eliminate a serious risk; if the first request is not complied with, the authority may require an information society service provider to restrict access. Do not describe that power as an automatic consequence of every defective listing.

Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 Article 4 says a covered product may be placed on the EU market only if there is an economic operator established in the Union responsible for the Article 4(3) tasks. The Commission guidance explains the practical test: check whether the product is within Article 4 covered harmonisation legislation and whether the offer or supply is aimed at the EU market, including online or other distance sales.

The current consolidated Article 4(5) list includes specified legislation for construction products, personal protective equipment, gas appliances, batteries, critical raw materials, outdoor-noise equipment, machinery, toys, ecodesign, hazardous substances in electrical equipment, pyrotechnics, recreational craft, simple pressure vessels, electromagnetic compatibility, weighing and measuring instruments, explosive atmospheres, low-voltage equipment, radio equipment, and pressure equipment. Product scope still depends on the exact act and product facts, and another EU act can expressly apply Article 4.

The eligible operator is selected from the supply chain. Use an EU manufacturer if one places the product on the market; otherwise use the EU importer where the manufacturer is outside the Union. A manufacturer may instead give a written mandate to an EU authorised representative for the Article 4 tasks. If none of those exists and an EU fulfilment service provider handles the product, that provider can be the Article 4 operator for the units it handles.

The operator must verify that the required declaration of conformity or declaration of performance and technical documentation have been drawn up. It must keep the declaration available for market surveillance authorities and ensure technical documentation can be made available on request.

The operator must provide information and documentation needed to demonstrate conformity after a reasoned authority request, inform market surveillance authorities when it has reason to believe the product presents a risk, and cooperate so corrective action is taken or risks are mitigated. Its name, registered trade name or trademark, and contact details including postal address must appear on the product, packaging, parcel, or an accompanying document.

Article 6 applies the legal concept of making available on the market to an online listing, marketplace offer, app listing, email offer, or other distance-sale channel when the offer is targeted at EU end users. The test is not limited to where the seller is established.

Targeting is assessed case by case. Recital 15 points to dispatch areas, the languages available for the offer or ordering, and means of payment. A website's mere accessibility from a Member State is not enough without facts showing that the operator directs its activity there.

For products in Article 4 scope, a product may be placed on the EU market only if an economic operator established in the Union is responsible for the Article 4 tasks. That can be an EU manufacturer, importer, authorised representative, or, where no such actor exists, an EU fulfilment service provider for products it handles.

For direct-to-EU shipments from a non-EU manufacturer with no EU importer, the Article 4 guidance says the product may not be offered to EU end users unless the manufacturer has appointed an authorised representative for the Article 4 tasks. Article 4 contact details also need to appear on the product, packaging, parcel, or accompanying document.

Keep a record showing why the offer was or was not targeted at EU end users and whether Article 4 coverage existed before the product was offered or shipped. Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 has applied from 16 July 2021; assess the offer and operator arrangement in force on the relevant date. Keep screenshots, exports, marketplace settings, contracts, and fulfilment records that can be matched to the exact SKU, model, software version, and offer date.

Start by matching the request to the product, model, batch, software or firmware version, sales channel, and EU market where the authority is asking. Then identify the relevant economic operator: the EU manufacturer, importer, authorised representative with a written mandate, or, where no such operator is established in the Union for the handled product, the EU fulfilment service provider.

For products covered by Article 4, the operator must verify that the EU declaration of conformity or declaration of performance and technical documentation have been drawn up when the applicable Union harmonisation law requires them. It must keep the declaration available for the period required by that law and ensure the technical documentation can be made available to the authority on request.

Treat the authority request as a controlled response record. For an Article 4 reasoned request, confirm the stated compliance purpose, provide the documents specifically requested in a language the authority can easily understand, and keep a log of what was sent, what was identified as not applicable, who approved the response, and any corrective action promised or completed.

For covered products, Article 4 creates an authority contact point in the Union and assigns tasks around declarations, technical documentation access, information requests, risk notification, and corrective-action cooperation.

If the Article 4 operator does not hold the full technical file, the response process still needs proof that the file exists and can be supplied by the manufacturer or another documented source. The Commission guidance treats this as an access and cooperation arrangement, especially for fulfilment service providers that do not automatically have a formal manufacturer relationship.

Keep the pack concise enough for an authority reviewer to follow. Separate the documents that prove conformity from the coordination records that prove the company handled the request properly.

Do not invent a universal deadline. The Commission's Article 4 guidance says the declaration of conformity or performance should be provided without delay and other documents within a reasonable period, or within a deadline set by the authority. The actual response window must come from the request and any applicable sector or national procedural rule.

If the authority later issues a measure, decision, or order, Article 18 requires it to state the exact grounds and tell the economic operator about available national remedies and their time limits. The operator must normally have an opportunity to be heard for at least 10 working days, although an urgent public-interest case can justify acting first and hearing the operator promptly afterward.

A generic compliance statement does not answer a product-specific authority request. The response should show that the named operator can connect the exact product to the declaration, technical documentation, tests, and corrective-action status.

Another common weakness is assuming that a distributor, platform, fulfilment service provider, importer, or authorised representative can obtain manufacturer records without a written access route. The evidence file should show who has the records and how the authority can receive them.

Regulation (EU) 2019/1020 defines corrective action as action by an economic operator to end non-compliance, either because a market surveillance authority requires it or because the operator acts on its own initiative. A voluntary measure is corrective action that was not required by an authority.

Apply this MSR route only to products covered by Union harmonisation legislation and only to the extent that the applicable sector legislation does not contain specific provisions with the same objective that regulate the same aspect more specifically. Identify the product, sector act, economic-operator role, Member State authority, affected market, and provision before selecting an action.

Authority action starts when the authority finds that the product, under intended or reasonably foreseeable use and when properly installed and maintained, is liable to compromise user health or safety, or does not conform to applicable Union harmonisation legislation. The authority must then require the relevant economic operator to take appropriate and proportionate corrective action within a period specified by the authority.

The required action can include bringing the product into compliance, preventing it from being made available, withdrawing or recalling it and alerting the public, destroying or rendering it inoperable, adding suitable risk warnings, setting prior conditions for market availability, or alerting end users at risk. Warnings, prior conditions, and end-user alerts under Article 16(3)(e) to (g) are available only where the product presents a risk in certain conditions or only to certain end users.

A product presents a serious risk when a risk assessment, considering normal and foreseeable use, shows that the probability and severity of harm require rapid authority intervention. The fact that safer products exist, or that a higher level of safety is technically feasible, is not enough by itself to classify the product as a serious risk.

For serious risk, market surveillance authorities must ensure withdrawal or recall where no other effective means can eliminate the risk, or prohibit the product from being made available on the market. Article 20 requires immediate Commission notification when the authority considers that the reasons for, or effects of, an Article 19 measure go beyond its Member State. It separately requires immediate notification of a communicated voluntary measure when the serious-risk product has been made available on the market.

A measure, decision, or order must state its exact grounds and identify the remedies and time limits available under national law. The economic operator must normally receive at least 10 working days to be heard; an urgent health, safety, or other protected-public-interest ground can justify action first, followed by a prompt hearing and review.

A serious-risk decision requires more than a finding that a product is non-compliant. The MSR definition combines the probability that a hazard will cause harm with the severity of that harm and asks whether rapid authority intervention is required. The effects of the risk do not have to be immediate. Article 19 then requires an appropriate assessment of the nature of the hazard and the likelihood of its occurrence.

Where the product presents a serious risk, market surveillance authorities must ensure withdrawal or recall when no other effective measure can eliminate the risk, or prohibit the product from being made available on the market. Article 16 also allows proportionate corrective action such as bringing the product into compliance, preventing further availability, warnings, public alerts, withdrawal, recall, destruction, or restrictions. Warnings, prior conditions, and end-user alerts may be required only where the product presents a risk in certain conditions or only to certain end users.