Search every question across sub-FAQs

Start with the product and hazard, not with a spreadsheet score. Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/3173 says the Safety Gate risk assessment describes a harm scenario: how the hazard leads to harm, how severe the harm is, and how probable it is during the product's foreseeable lifetime.

The delegated criteria use four risk results for Safety Gate purposes: serious, high, medium, and low. Where several hazards or harm scenarios exist, each scenario should be assessed and the highest resulting level should drive the Article 26 notification analysis.

The GPSR also treats some serious-risk situations differently. A serious risk can be presumed where the delegated criteria are met, including when the product is linked to probable severe harm without adequate consumer precautions or information, when the economic operator or online marketplace indicates serious risk, or when the product has been subject to recall, withdrawal, or online-content removal based on voluntary measures.

Serious risk matters because GPSR Article 26 uses Safety Gate for rapid exchange of information about corrective measures for dangerous products. The delegated Safety Gate rules classify serious-risk notifications separately from other-risk notifications and require the notification to include product identification, risk level, risk assessment, and the taken or envisaged corrective measures.

A serious-risk conclusion should therefore trigger two records at the same time: the consumer-safety action record and the notification evidence record. The first explains what will remove or reduce the risk; the second explains why the case is serious enough for Safety Gate handling and what information authorities need to identify the product and follow up.

Do not describe the risk level separately from the action. The evidence should show why the product is dangerous, which consumers or end users can be harmed, whether the product is still in listings, stock, distribution, or consumer hands, and which corrective measure is proportionate to reduce or eliminate the risk.

For a recall, the GPSR requires consumer-facing information that is clear enough for consumers to identify the product, understand the hazard, and know what action to take. The recall notice must avoid wording that lowers risk perception, such as presenting the recall as merely voluntary or precautionary when the product safety recall must be taken seriously.

Avoid making the answer look more precise than the source material. The grounded Safety Gate method supports severity, probability, serious/high/medium/low outcomes, highest-scenario handling, presumptions of serious risk, and notification evidence. It does not support an invented numeric company score, a universal matrix outside the delegated criteria, or national authority procedures not present in the grounding material.

Also avoid treating any certificate, standard, or supplier statement as conclusive by itself. It can support the risk decision only when it matches the product, hazard, affected market, and corrective measure being documented.

The GPSR is not limited to new goods. It applies to products placed or made available on the EU market whether they are new, used, repaired, or reconditioned. A product can also be in scope if it was not originally intended for consumers but is likely, under reasonably foreseeable conditions, to be used by consumers.

For used-product channels, the practical first test is whether a trader is supplying a consumer product for distribution, consumption, or use on the Union market in the course of a commercial activity. Private, non-commercial fact patterns are not the same as a trader placing or making products available on the market.

Two GPSR exclusions are especially important for used and refurbished-product pages. Antiques are excluded. Products that need repair or reconditioning before use are also outside this GPSR application rule when they are placed or made available on the market and are clearly marked as needing that repair or reconditioning before use.

Do not stretch those exclusions. A working refurbished item marketed for ordinary consumer use is different from an item explicitly sold as needing repair before use. A collectible claim should be supported by facts showing why consumers cannot reasonably expect state-of-the-art safety standards.

The duty owner depends on the role in the supply chain. Manufacturers must ensure products meet the general safety requirement, carry out an internal risk analysis, and draw up technical documentation before placing products on the market. Importers, distributors, authorised representatives, fulfilment service providers, and other economic operators have role-specific duties.

A refurbisher or reseller can become the manufacturer for GPSR purposes if it places the product on the market under its own name or trademark. A person that substantially modifies a product is also treated as the manufacturer for the affected part, or for the whole product if the modification affects overall safety.

For a product sold as safe to use, evidence should connect the condition of the specific item or batch to the GPSR safety conclusion. Manufacturer duties include internal risk analysis and technical documentation with the product description, essential safety characteristics, possible risks, solutions adopted to eliminate or mitigate those risks, test reports where relevant, and applied standards or other safety elements.

Used and refurbished products often need more condition-specific evidence than new stock. The file should show what was inspected, repaired, replaced, cleaned, updated, retested, relabelled, or repackaged, and whether instructions and warnings still match the product that will reach the consumer.

The GPSR distance-sales rule applies when economic operators make products available online or through other distance sales. The offer must clearly and visibly show manufacturer contact information, responsible-person information where the manufacturer is not established in the Union, product identification including a picture and type or other identifier, and required warnings or safety information in an understandable language for the Member State where the product is made available.

Online marketplace providers must organise their interfaces so traders can provide that product safety and traceability information and consumers can access it from the product listing. Marketplace providers also have GPSR duties for product-safety contacts, internal processes, dangerous-product orders, notices, Safety Gate use, and cooperation with authorities and traders.

For consumer products made available online or through other distance sales, GPSR Article 19 requires the offer itself to clearly and visibly indicate four groups of information before purchase.

The listing needs the manufacturer's name, registered trade name or registered trade mark, plus postal and electronic contact address. If the manufacturer is not established in the EU, the listing also needs the name, postal address, and electronic address of the responsible person in the Union under GPSR Article 16 or Market Surveillance Regulation Article 4.

The offer must also identify the product, including a picture, the product type, and any other product identifier. Any warning or safety information required on the product, packaging, or accompanying document must appear in a language easily understood by consumers in the Member State where the product is made available.

The evidence file should prove what consumers and marketplace operators could see at the time the offer was live. That matters because GPSR and the Safety Gate notification rules use offer-level details, not only internal catalogue records.

For each EU-facing offer, keep a dated listing capture that shows the product page, seller or trader account, marketplace name if applicable, offer URL, listing or offer identifier, product photo, product type, model or SKU, manufacturer details, EU responsible-person details when required, and the displayed warnings or safety information.

Use the listing review as a release gate for every EU-facing consumer product offer. The reviewer should compare the live page against the approved product safety file, not only against a merchandising checklist.

Most listing failures happen when safety information is treated as back-office data instead of consumer-facing offer content. GPSR listing duties attach to the online offer, so the live page has to carry the relevant information clearly enough for a consumer to see it before purchase.

Treat the report as a product-safety case, not as a generic content complaint. Identify whether it is an authority order to remove, disable, or warn on a dangerous-product offer; a notice submitted under the marketplace notice mechanism; a Safety Gate Portal alert; or information showing the marketplace has actual knowledge of a dangerous product offered through its service.

For an authority order under GPSR Article 22(4), the marketplace must be able to receive and process the order, act without undue delay and within two working days from receipt, and tell the issuing market surveillance authority what effect was given to the order. Orders can also cover identical content for a prescribed period when the order identifies the information needed to find those offers and no independent safety assessment is required.

For product-safety notices received under Article 16 of the Digital Services Act, GPSR Article 22(8) gives a separate processing expectation: without undue delay and within three working days from receipt. That notice handling record should stay separate from an authority order record because the trigger, evidence threshold, and response clock are different.

Safety Gate and the Safety Business Gateway serve different parts of the marketplace response. Safety Gate circulates authority alerts about dangerous non-food products, including the product, risk, and measures taken. The GPSR also requires marketplaces to take account of regular dangerous-product information received through the Safety Gate Portal when applying voluntary measures to detect, identify, remove, or disable dangerous-product offers.

The Safety Business Gateway is the route for businesses, including concerned online marketplace providers, to report dangerous products and accidents to Member State market surveillance authorities. Where the marketplace has actual knowledge of dangerous products offered through its interface, Article 22 requires it to inform the relevant Member States through the Safety Business Gateway with available risk, quantity, and corrective-measure details.

The evidence file should let the marketplace explain why it removed, disabled, warned, reported, or left a listing live. GPSR Article 22 ties marketplace action to the concrete offer of a dangerous product, the authority order or notice received, Safety Gate information, and the cooperation needed to eliminate or mitigate risk.

Capture evidence before the listing changes. Screenshots alone are not enough if they omit product identifiers, trader details, quantities, affected Member States, timestamps, or the exact content that the order or notice identified.

The main mistake is mixing the clocks and channels. A market surveillance authority order, a third-party notice, a Safety Gate alert, and a Safety Business Gateway report are related, but they are not the same event and should not be documented as one generic ticket.

Do not invent national filing steps or fixed deadlines beyond the GPSR source text. Where the file does not contain an authority order or a notice received under the DSA notice channel, use the grounded standard of acting without undue delay and keep the reason for the chosen action in the case record.

Start with the consumer outcome, not the internal compliance history. A GPSR recall notice should let a consumer decide in seconds whether they own the affected product, why continued use is unsafe, what to do next, what remedy is available, and how to get help.

The EU model notice published under Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/1435 uses the structure '[company name] recalls [product]' and then separates product identification, danger, consumer action, remedies, and contact details. If product photos contain essential identification information, the same information should also appear as machine-readable text for online notices.

The GPSR starts with direct notification: economic operators and online marketplaces should notify all identifiable affected consumers directly and without undue delay, using customer data they already hold for recalls and safety warnings.

When not all affected consumers can be contacted directly, the notice must be clear and visible through other appropriate channels with the widest possible reach. Grounded examples include the company website, social media channels, newsletters, retail outlets, and, where appropriate, mass media or other communication channels. Information must be accessible to persons with disabilities.

The public notice should be short enough for consumers, but the recall record behind it should show why the message, remedy, and action are complete. Keep the product risk assessment, test or visual inspection evidence, affected-product identifiers, quantity and market scope, action owner, action status, and consumer remedy rationale with the final notice text.

For a recall from consumers, distinguish recall from withdrawal. The Safety Business Gateway manual repeats the GPSR distinction: recall aims at the return of a product already made available to the consumer, while withdrawal aims to prevent a product in the supply chain from being made available on the market.