EU Digital Product Passport Public vs restricted passport data
Do not treat the DPP as one public web page. ESPR expects access to be differentiated by data type and stakeholder role, with product-specific delegated acts deciding who can see or update each data set.
This FAQ helps classify public consumer data, restricted value-chain data, authority-only evidence, registry records, and customs information without exposing confidential business information.
There is no universal public-versus-restricted field list for every EU Digital Product Passport. Under ESPR, the applicable product-group specifies the passport data, who may read each field, and who may create or update it. Separate legislation can use a different access model: the Batteries Regulation, for example, defines public, authority-only, and legitimate-interest categories.
Access model
Public vs restricted passport data
Compare the main DPP visibility categories teams need to separate before publishing, sharing, or registering passport data.
Battery model information such as material composition, carbon footprint information, recycled content, rated capacity, voltage, power capability, lifetime, warranty period, and waste-battery management information is listed as publicly accessible.
Battery detailed composition, spare-part source details, dismantling information, safety measures, test report results, and individual-battery state data are assigned to narrower access groups.
Registry and customs flows use unique identifiers, unique registration identifiers, and commodity codes for verification and release-for-free-circulation controls.
Restricted data governance focuses on authentication, purpose limitation, update permissions, integrity, security, privacy, and protection of confidential business information.
Improper access or update rights can also breach the or ESPR's technical requirements. Authorities can require corrective action, while penalties are set under Member State rules.
Battery model information such as material composition, carbon footprint information, recycled content, rated capacity, voltage, power capability, lifetime, warranty period, and waste-battery management information is listed as publicly accessible.
Battery detailed composition, spare-part source details, dismantling information, safety measures, test report results, and individual-battery state data are assigned to narrower access groups.
Registry and customs flows use unique identifiers, unique registration identifiers, and commodity codes for verification and release-for-free-circulation controls.
Restricted data governance focuses on authentication, purpose limitation, update permissions, integrity, security, privacy, and protection of confidential business information.
Improper access or update rights can also breach the or ESPR's technical requirements. Authorities can require corrective action, while penalties are set under Member State rules.
What is the rule for public versus restricted DPP data?
Under ESPR, a digital product passport must contain the data specified in the applicable product-group . That delegated act must state which actors have access to which data, who can create or update passport data, and how long the passport remains available.
Build an access matrix before publishing the passport. Mark each data field as public, restricted to defined value-chain actors, restricted to authorities or notified bodies, registry-only, customs-relevant, or unsupported by the applicable product rule.
Public data should support customer access, comparison, circularity decisions, and other public uses named in the product rule.
Restricted data should be limited to the actors that need it for repair, reuse, recycling, conformity, market surveillance, customs, or another specified role.
Update rights are separate from read rights: ESPR requires rights to introduce, modify, or update passport data to be restricted according to access rights.
Do not publish confidential business information simply because it sits in the passport data model; ESPR expressly requires differentiated access and protection of confidential business information.
Articles 9 to 11 require delegated acts to define passport data, actor access, update rights, and technical safeguards; the recitals explain the need for differentiated access without exposing confidential business information.
Question 2
Which access categories should a DPP team design for?
A useful DPP access design separates the public portal experience from the restricted operational layer. Public data should be reachable without unnecessary login friction. Restricted data should require authentication or equivalent controls tied to the actor's role.
The battery passport shows why this matters. Annex XIII to the Batteries Regulation divides passport content into public model-level information, information for persons with a legitimate interest and the Commission, information only for notified bodies, market surveillance authorities and the Commission, and individual-battery data for persons with a legitimate interest.
Public model data: consumer-facing and comparison data, such as the categories made public for battery models.
Restricted legitimate-interest data: operational detail such as dismantling, spare parts, safety measures, or individual item status where the sector rule grants access.
Authority and notified-body data: conformity evidence such as test report results when the rule reserves it for notified bodies, market surveillance authorities, and the Commission.
Customs data: identifiers and commodity codes used to verify imported products against the DPP registry, not a general public disclosure channel.
The CEN-CENELEC guidance describes public access without logins and restricted access through software roles or authentication.
Recommended next step
Turn DPP access rules into an evidence matrix
Map each passport field to its legal source, role-based visibility, update rights, registry handling, and customs evidence before exposing public DPP data.
How do the registry, web portal, and customs checks differ?
The ESPR Registry and the public DPP web portal serve different functions. The Registry went live on 20 July 2026 and stores identifiers and required registration metadata. Under ESPR it stores at least unique identifiers, and for products intended for release for free circulation it also stores the commodity code. Economic operators upload the required data, and the Registry returns a unique registration identifier.
The web portal is the public search and comparison layer. It must allow stakeholders to search and compare passport data consistently with the access rights set in delegated acts. Customs controls use the registry and passport data for risk management, customs controls, and release for free circulation.
Registry: at least unique identifiers, plus commodity code for products intended for release for free circulation.
Web portal: public search and comparison, limited by each stakeholder's access rights.
Customs: electronic verification of the unique registration identifier and commodity code begins only when the separate EU CSW-CERTEX interconnection is operational.
Evidence implication: keep registry upload records, the returned unique registration identifier, commodity-code mapping, and the access-rights matrix together.
Confirms the 20 July 2026 Registry launch, current testing environment, registration channels, and decentralised storage of complete product data.
Question 4
What evidence should teams keep?
Keep evidence that proves the access decision for each data field. A visitor, auditor, authority, supplier, repairer, or customs broker should be able to see why a field was public, restricted, authority-only, customs-relevant, or excluded from publication.
The evidence should also show who can change passport data. Read access for a recycler, repairer, authority, or customer does not automatically mean write access.
A DPP data inventory mapped to the applicable or sector rule.
An access-rights matrix by field, actor, purpose, read permission, update permission, and authentication method.
A confidential-business-information review for data proposed for public display.
Registry evidence: uploaded identifiers, commodity code where relevant, and the returned unique registration identifier.
Customs evidence: process controls for making the unique registration identifier available when a covered product is released for free circulation.
Change-control evidence showing who created, modified, or updated each restricted passport field.