FAQ item index

Search every question across sub-FAQs

Find the exact question, open the source answer card, and copy a direct link to the anchored sub-FAQ response.

Indexed coverage
856of856items
Across 40 modules • Updated Jul 24, 2026
Author
Sorena AI
Published
Mar 10, 2026
Updated
Jul 24, 2026
CRA Legacy Products

Is there any CRA obligation that still applies to pre-11 December 2027 products even if they are not substantially modified?

Yes.

Article 69(3) creates a specific derogation for reporting. It says Article 14 applies to all in-scope products that were placed on the market before 11 December 2027, and Article 71(2) says Article 14 starts to apply on 11 September 2026.

Citations
Cyber Resilience Act

Article 69(3) extends Article 14 to pre-11 December 2027 in-scope products, while Article 71(2) sets the Article 14 application date.

CRA Legacy Products

If a product was already placed on the market before 11 December 2027, can it continue to be sold or otherwise made available after that date?

Yes.

The Commission FAQ explains that individual products placed on the market before 11 December 2027 do not need to be brought into CRA conformity simply because they remain in the distribution chain after that date.

Citations
European Commission CRA FAQs

Sections 1.4, 7.2, and 7.5 explain that individual products already placed on the market are not brought into full CRA conformity merely by later distribution.

Blue Guide 2022

Sections 2.2 and 2.3 distinguish placing on the market from later making available in the distribution chain.

CRA Legacy Products

Do products have to reach the final user before 11 December 2027 to count as CRA legacy products?

No.

The Commission FAQ gives a direct example: units already placed on the market before 11 December 2027 do not need to be brought into CRA compliance even if they have not yet reached the final user. The legal question is whether the individual product was placed on the market, not whether it was already sold to the final customer or put into service.

Citations
European Commission CRA FAQs

Section 7.2 gives the router-stock example where units placed on the market before 11 December 2027 need not have reached the final user.

Blue Guide 2022

Blue Guide sections 2.3 and 2.6 explain the distribution-chain and final-user concepts used to separate placement from later delivery.

CRA Legacy Products

If a manufacturer designed a product type before the CRA applies, can it keep placing newly manufactured units of that type on the market after 11 December 2027?

No, not unless those newly placed units comply with the CRA.

The Commission FAQ stresses that Union harmonisation legislation, including the CRA, applies to individual products, not to abstract product types or models. So a product is not grandfathered just because an earlier unit of the same type was placed on the market before 11 December 2027.

Citations
Blue Guide 2022

Blue Guide sections 2.2 and 2.3 support the individual-product placement analysis used for later manufactured units.

CRA Legacy Products

What happens if a pre-11 December 2027 product is substantially modified after that date?

Then the CRA starts to apply to that product.

Article 69(2) makes substantial modification the trigger. The CRA definition in Article 3(30) covers changes made after placing on the market that affect compliance with the essential cybersecurity requirements in Annex I Part I or change the intended purpose for which the product was assessed.

Citations
Cyber Resilience Act

Article 69(2) uses substantial modification as the transition trigger; Article 3(30) and recital 41 explain the concept.

CRA Legacy Products

If a legacy product receives a bug-fix or security update after 11 December 2027, does that automatically bring the product into the CRA?

No.

The Commission FAQ gives a direct example: a smart TV placed on the market before 11 December 2027 does not become subject to full CRA requirements merely because it receives a later bug-fix update. Recital 39 of the CRA also says that a security update designed to decrease cybersecurity risk, without modifying intended purpose, is not considered a substantial modification.

Citations
Cyber Resilience Act

Recital 39 explains why security updates that reduce risk without changing intended purpose are not substantial modifications.

CRA Legacy Products

What is an example of a post-2027 change that would bring a legacy product into the CRA?

The Commission FAQ gives an example where a smart TV placed on the market before 11 December 2027 later receives an update enabling smart-home control. The FAQ treats that as a substantial modification.

That result is consistent with recital 39, which says feature updates that modify original intended functions or the type or performance of the product and increase cybersecurity risk should be treated as substantial modifications.

Citations
Cyber Resilience Act

Recital 39 supports the distinction between risk-reducing security updates and feature updates that broaden attack surface.

CRA Legacy Products

Do maintenance, repair, or refurbishment of Legacy Products automatically count as substantial modifications under the CRA?

No.

Recital 42 says refurbishment, maintenance, and repair do not necessarily lead to a substantial modification. That will depend on whether the intended purpose and functionalities change and whether the level of risk remains unaffected.

Citations
Cyber Resilience Act

Recital 42 explains that repair, maintenance, and refurbishment are not automatically substantial modifications.

CRA Legacy Products

If a legacy product becomes substantially modified, who is treated as the manufacturer of the modified product?

The person who carries out the substantial modification and makes the product available on the market is treated as the manufacturer for CRA purposes.

That can be the original manufacturer, but it can also be an importer, distributor, or another natural or legal person. Article 21 covers importers and distributors, and Article 22 covers other persons that substantially modify products and make them available on the market.

Citations
Cyber Resilience Act

Articles 21 and 22 identify when importers, distributors, or other persons become manufacturers after substantial modification.

CRA Legacy Products

If a legacy product is substantially modified, does the CRA apply only to the changed feature or to the product more broadly?

That depends on the impact of the modification.

Article 22(2) says the person carrying out the substantial modification is subject to Articles 13 and 14 for the part of the product affected by the substantial modification or, if the substantial modification has an impact on the cybersecurity of the product as a whole, for the entire product.

Citations
Cyber Resilience Act

Article 22(2) explains whether the modified part or the whole product falls under Articles 13 and 14.

CRA Legacy Products

If a distributor is selling pre-11 December 2027 stock after the CRA applies, does the distributor have to bring that stock into compliance?

No, not on that basis alone.

The Commission FAQ says distributors are not required to bring into compliance products that were already placed on the market before 11 December 2027, unless they themselves carry out a substantial modification.

Citations
Cyber Resilience Act

Article 21 matters because a distributor that carries out a substantial modification is treated as a manufacturer.

CRA Legacy Products

Do identical spare parts for CRA legacy products fall outside the CRA?

Often yes.

Article 2(6) excludes spare parts made available on the market to replace identical components in products with digital elements where the spare parts are manufactured according to the same specifications as the components they are intended to replace. Recital 29 adds that this exemption is meant to cover spare parts used to repair legacy products made available before the CRA's date of application.

Citations
Cyber Resilience Act

Article 2(6) defines the identical-spare-part exclusion; recital 29 ties it to repair of legacy products.

CRA Legacy Products

If the replacement part is not identical, is it automatically a substantial modification of the old product?

Not automatically.

Inference from the CRA text: Article 2(6) only answers whether the identical spare-parts exemption applies. Whether installing a non-identical replacement part becomes a substantial modification is a separate question that still turns on Article 3(30), meaning whether the change affects Annex I Part I compliance or changes the intended purpose for which the product was assessed.

Citations
CRA Legacy Products

For CRA legacy products placed on the market before 11 December 2027, when do the reporting obligations start in practice?

They start on 11 September 2026.

That is the date Article 14 begins to apply under Article 71(2). The Commission FAQ confirms that, from that date, Article 14 applies even to in-scope products that had been placed on the market before 11 December 2027.

Citations
Cyber Resilience Act

Article 69(3) applies Article 14 to pre-application products; Article 71(2) makes Article 14 applicable from 11 September 2026.

CRA Legacy Products

For those CRA legacy products, do the early reporting rules mean the manufacturer must also bring the whole product into full CRA conformity?

No.

The Commission FAQ says that, for products placed on the market before 11 December 2027, manufacturers are required to comply with the Article 14 reporting obligations, but those products are not otherwise brought into the full CRA regime unless they are substantially modified. Article 69(3) is a derogation specifically for Article 14.

Citations
Cyber Resilience Act

Article 69(2) preserves the substantial-modification trigger, while Article 69(3) creates only an Article 14 reporting derogation.

European Commission CRA FAQs

Sections 1.4 and 5.3 confirm that Article 14 reporting does not by itself import the full vulnerability-handling regime.

Page 19 of 58