Artifact GuideGLOBALETSI EN 319 401

ETSI EN 319 401 compliance duties

A practical guide to the compliance clause in ETSI EN 319 401 V3.1.1 and the evidence a trust service provider needs around it.

This page maps V3.1.1. ETSI published V3.2.1 in January 2026; confirm the edition in scope and keep legal operation, privacy, accessibility, incident, continuity, and supplier evidence separate from broad compliance claims.

Author
Sorena AI
Published
May 9, 2026
Updated
Oct 15, 2026
Overview

Clause 7.13 of ETSI EN 319 401 V3.1.1 requires a trust service provider to operate legally and trustworthily, show how it meets applicable legal requirements, make trust services and related end-user products accessible to persons with disabilities where feasible, and protect personal data. A compliance file should connect those requirements to the service-specific legal inventory and to evidence from the risk, policy, personnel, access, logging, incident, continuity, termination, and supply-chain controls elsewhere in the standard.

Section 1

What does ETSI EN 319 401 mean by compliance?

Clause 7.13 does not identify every law that applies to a service. The has to identify those laws from its jurisdiction, service type, qualified or non-qualified status, processing activities, contracts, and operating locations, then retain evidence showing how each applicable requirement is met. EN 301 549 is a standard the clause says should be considered for accessibility; V3.1.1 does not make every EN 301 549 provision automatically applicable.

EN 319 401 is a type-independent baseline for operation and management. It does not supersede service-specific standards or define independent assessment methods. ETSI published V3.2.1 in January 2026, so this V3.1.1 guide is neither proof of qualified status nor a substitute for checking the edition and legal rules that control the actual service.

  • Start with the exact trust service, qualified or non-qualified status, policy, operating locations, systems, data flows, suppliers, and customer-facing terms that make up the compliance boundary.
  • Maintain a legal-requirements register with the source, jurisdiction, affected service or process, responsible owner, control, evidence, review trigger, and current status instead of making a broad "ETSI compliant" claim.
  • Keep accessibility decisions explicit: note whether the service or end-user product can be made accessible, what was done, and why any limitation is feasible or not feasible.
  • Treat personal-data protection as part of the compliance file, with controls for unauthorized or unlawful processing and accidental loss, destruction, or damage.
Section 2

Evidence starts before the compliance clause

A defensible EN 319 401 compliance file starts with the risk assessment in clause 5. The has to identify, analyse, and evaluate trust-service risks, choose risk treatment measures, document the necessary security requirements and operational procedures, review the assessment regularly, and have management approve the assessment and residual risk.

Clauses 6.1 through 6.3 then turn that risk work into governance evidence. The practice statement identifies how the addresses the applicable trust service policy, the terms and conditions tell subscribers and relying parties what service policy, limits, liabilities, log-retention period, assessment status, contact details, and availability commitments apply, and the information security policy sets the organization's approach to information security.

  • Keep the latest risk assessment, treatment decisions, operational procedures, management approval, and residual-risk acceptance together.
  • Use the trust service practice statement to show which policy requirements are addressed and which external organizations support the service.
  • Make subscriber and relying-party terms durable, understandable, and specific about limits, obligations, log retention, conformity assessment status, contact information, and availability.
  • Document how information security policy changes, service-provision changes, and configuration checks are communicated and approved.
Section 3

Operational controls that make compliance credible

The compliance claim is weak if it is not tied to operational controls. EN 319 401 requires segregation of conflicting duties, trained and reliable personnel, identified trusted roles, asset inventory and classification, least-privilege access administration, privileged-account controls, critical-application authentication, accountability through logs, key lifecycle controls, physical protection for critical systems, secure development analysis, and change control for operational software and configurations.

Link each compliance statement to the record that proves it: the asset register, role appointment, access review, change ticket, key-management record, physical-access record, or software-release approval. Record the service, system, period, owner, and any unresolved gap so the evidence supports the stated scope.

  • Identify trusted roles covering security-officer, system-administrator, system-operator, and system-auditor responsibilities, plus any additional roles required for the service.
  • Show that personnel and contractors have security responsibilities, suitable training, and completed checks before accessing trusted functions.
  • Keep the asset inventory useful: asset ID, owner, location, type, information handled, update or patch version, classification, and end-of-life data where applicable.
  • Tie privileged access, administrator accounts, access-right reviews, termination changes, and critical-application authentication to retained audit evidence.
Section 4

Incident, record, continuity, and termination evidence

EN 319 401 makes incident and record evidence concrete. The has to establish monitoring and logging mechanisms, detect abnormal activities, maintain and review logs, establish incident response procedures, document incident detection and response, report significant breaches according to applicable rules, assess and classify events, and perform post-incident reviews that identify root cause and reduce recurrence risk.

Records and continuity are also compliance evidence. Clause 7.10 requires relevant information about data issued and received by the to be recorded and kept accessible for an appropriate period, including after the TSP's activities cease, for legal evidence and service continuity. Clause 7.11 requires continuity, backup, recovery, and crisis-management planning; clause 7.12 requires termination planning for subscriber, relying-party, subcontractor, key, evidence-transfer, and service-transfer issues.

  • Keep logs for network traffic, user and permission management, administrator actions, critical configuration changes, security events, system resources, physical access where appropriate, and network equipment access.
  • For incidents, preserve detection records, severity assessment, communications, reporting decisions, containment, eradication, recovery, root cause, and post-incident actions.
  • For evidence retention, document confidentiality, integrity, archive location, UTC time synchronization, retention period, and resistance to easy deletion or destruction.
  • For continuity and termination, retain backup tests, crisis-plan reviews, subscriber and relying-party notices, subcontractor authorization termination, key destruction or withdrawal, and evidence-transfer arrangements.
Section 5

Supplier and cloud evidence belongs in the compliance file

Include supply-chain evidence when a supplier, cloud provider, subcontractor, outsourcer, or trust service component provider is involved. EN 319 401 requires processes and procedures for security risks associated with supplier products and services, including the ICT supply chain, and it requires the to maintain overall responsibility when other parties provide parts of the service.

For practical review, keep the supplier file close to the compliance file. It should show selection criteria, cybersecurity requirements, supplier agreements, service levels or audit mechanisms, critical-component traceability, cloud shared-responsibility expectations, monitoring of supplier changes, and a register of suppliers and agreements showing where information is managed or archived.

  • Require supplier criteria to address cybersecurity specifications, service risk and classification levels, diversification or lock-in limits, and critical-supply-chain risk assessment results.
  • Ask ICT suppliers for software-component information, implemented security functions, and secure-configuration requirements when those products support the trust service.
  • Use agreements, SLAs, or audit mechanisms to make supplier obligations visible and aligned with the 's risk assessment and security requirements.
  • Review supplier security practices at planned intervals and after supplier-related incidents, then update the supplier register and compliance evidence.
Primary sources

References and citations

etsi.org6 citations
Referenced sections
  • Primary ETSI standard used for all substantive compliance, evidence, risk, policy, operational, incident, continuity, termination, and supply-chain claims on this page.
  • Primary source for EN 319 401 scope, clause 7.13 compliance requirements, and adjacent evidence expectations for TSP operation.
  • Grounds the risk assessment, practice statement, terms and conditions, and information security policy evidence described in clauses 5 and 6.
Show 3 more
  • Supports the operational-control summary across clauses 7.1 to 7.8, including duties, personnel, assets, access, cryptography, physical security, operation security, and network security.
  • Grounds clauses 7.9 through 7.12 for monitoring, incident response, reporting, evidence retention, business continuity, and termination planning.
  • Supports clause 7.14 supply-chain policy, procedures, subcontracting, outsourcing, supplier agreements, SLAs, cloud-service responsibility, and supplier registers.
"Trust Service Providers"
More quoted passages
"legal and trustworthy manner"
"Trust Service Practice statement"
"least privileges"
"Collection of evidence"
"Supply chain policy"
etsi.org2 citations
Referenced sections
  • Published successor edition used to establish the edition boundary for this V3.1.1 compliance guide.
  • Published successor edition; check it before treating this V3.1.1 clause map as current.
Show all related guides (23)

ETSI EN 319 401 Personnel, Asset, and Access Controls

Clause-focused EN 319 401 V3.1.1 guide to TSP personnel duties, trusted roles, asset inventories, classification, and access-control evidence.

ETSI EN 319 401 policy and security requirements

ETSI EN 319 401 guidance for TSP policy and security requirements covering risk assessment, practice statements, terms, security controls, incidents, and evidence.

ETSI EN 319 401 requirements map

Map ETSI EN 319 401 V3.1.1 requirements for trust service providers across risk assessment, policies, TSP operations, incidents, evidence, continuity, termination, and supply chain controls.

ETSI EN 319 401 Risk Assessment and Treatment

Clause-cited ETSI EN 319 401 V3.1.1 guidance for trust service risk assessment, risk treatment, residual-risk approval, and evidence planning.

ETSI EN 319 401 Subcontractor Controls

Practical EN 319 401 guidance for TSP subcontractor controls: retained responsibility, agreements, SLAs, supplier registers, monitoring, and audit evidence.

ETSI EN 319 401 Subcontractor Evidence Workflow

Build an EN 319 401 subcontractor evidence workflow for TSP supplier agreements, SLAs, audit mechanisms, risk reviews, supplier registers, and archived records.

ETSI EN 319 401 Trust Service Applicability Workflow

A scoped workflow for deciding when ETSI EN 319 401 applies to a trust service and what TSP policy, risk, terms, operations, and supplier evidence to collect.

ETSI EN 319 401 Trust Service Provider Applicability

Use ETSI EN 319 401 to decide whether a trust service provider activity falls in the standard's type-independent baseline and what service, policy, risk, supplier, and evidence boundaries to document.

ETSI EN 319 401 vs eIDAS: Controls and Legal Duties

Compare ETSI EN 319 401 V3.2.1 with current eIDAS duties for qualified and non-qualified trust service providers, including risk, incidents, audits, records, and termination.

ETSI EN 319 401 vs EN 319 403-1: TSP Policy vs CAB Assessment

Compare ETSI EN 319 401 V3.2.1 provider controls with EN 319 403-1 V2.3.1 CAB requirements for audit scope, evidence, sampling, reports, corrective action, and reassessment.

CA and RA responsibilities under ETSI EN 319 401

How ETSI EN 319 401 frames CA and RA responsibility: TSP practice statements, management approval, role segregation, subcontractor control, and evidence boundaries.

eIDAS Articles 19 and 24: current ETSI mapping

Understand why old EN 319 401 editions mapped eIDAS Article 19, what replaced it, and how V3.2.1 maps current Article 24 duties.

ETSI EN 319 401 conformity assessment bodies: what is covered?

Understand what ETSI EN 319 401 says, and does not say, about conformity assessment bodies, independent assessment, and TSP evidence preparation.

ETSI EN 319 401 policy documentation: what is required?

How ETSI EN 319 401 treats practice statements, terms, network and information systems security policy, evidence records, and change review.

ETSI EN 319 401 Subcontractor Requirements FAQ

How ETSI EN 319 401 treats subcontractors, outsourcing, supplier agreements, SLAs, monitoring, evidence, and retained TSP responsibility.

Security Incidents in ETSI EN 319 401

How ETSI EN 319 401 V3.2.1 expects TSPs to detect, classify, respond to, report, document, test, and review security incidents.

Trust service provider scope under ETSI EN 319 401

How to scope ETSI EN 319 401 for a trust service provider: service boundaries, trust service policy, practice statement, terms, risks, and third-party components.