Search every question across sub-FAQs

ESPR Article 18 directs the Commission to prioritise products by looking at their potential contribution to EU climate, environmental, and energy-efficiency objectives. The criteria include improvement potential without disproportionate costs, gaps or insufficiency in existing Union law, market-performance disparities, sales and trade volumes in the Union, value-chain impacts, energy and resource use, waste generation, and the need to adapt rules as technology and markets change.

The regulation also requires the Commission to adopt and publish a working plan. That plan lists product groups prioritised for ecodesign requirements, estimated timelines for setting them, and product aspects or groups considered for horizontal requirements. Product-priority status is therefore a signal that a product group is in the Commission pipeline, not a substitute for a product-specific legal act.

Article 18 names the product groups the Commission must prioritise in the first working plan: iron and steel; aluminium; textiles, in particular garments and footwear; furniture, including mattresses; tyres; detergents; paints; lubricants; chemicals; relevant energy-related products; and information and communication technology products and other electronics. The Commission must justify any departure from that list in the first working plan.

The adopted 2025-2030 plan selects textiles and apparel, furniture, tyres, mattresses, iron and steel, and aluminium for new ESPR work. It also selects horizontal requirements on repairability and on recycled content and recyclability of electrical and electronic equipment. Its indicative adoption years are 2026 for iron and steel; 2027 for textiles and apparel, tyres, aluminium, and repairability; 2028 for furniture; and 2029 for mattresses and the electrical and electronic equipment measure.

Those years are indicative dates for adopting measures, not dates when businesses must comply. Map products, components, materials, and sales channels against the adopted plan, then track preparatory-study launches, Ecodesign Forum consultations, draft delegated acts, adopted acts, and the application date in each final act.

Product priorities become operationally binding only when the relevant delegated act sets ecodesign requirements for the product group. ESPR Article 8 says delegated acts must define the product group, the requirements, the relevant parameters, verification methods, information needed for compliance checks, conformity assessment, transitional period, and review timing.

The same dependency applies to Digital Product Passport obligations. ESPR says DPP information requirements apply in accordance with the applicable delegated act, and that act specifies the data to be included, data carrier, access rules, level of identification, update responsibilities, and availability period. A priority product group may therefore be a strong readiness signal, but it does not by itself fix the DPP fields for a business system.

Use JRC material to understand the evidence base behind prioritisation and methodology. The preliminary JRC study describes screening of end-use and intermediate product groups, environmental relevance, policy gaps, improvement potential, and horizontal measures; it also states that its results are preliminary and do not bind the Commission.

Use CIRPASS material for DPP-readiness questions such as data governance, interoperability, system architecture, value-chain access, and implementation barriers. Do not convert CIRPASS recommendations or roadmaps into legal requirements unless the same point appears in ESPR or in an adopted delegated or implementing act.

Article 24 applies to economic operators that discard unsold consumer products directly or have those products discarded on their behalf. The disclosed information must cover the number and weight of discarded unsold consumer products per year, differentiated by product type or category.

The disclosure must also explain the reasons for discarding, identify any relevant Article 25 derogation, show the proportion delivered to preparing for reuse, refurbishment, remanufacturing, recycling, other recovery including energy recovery, or disposal, and describe measures taken or planned to prevent destruction. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/2 standardises the presentation, uses Combined Nomenclature codes for product categories, requires kilograms for weight, and explains how to report estimates, unknown treatment routes, and consolidated group disclosures.

The implementing format applies from 2 March 2027. It applies to products discarded in each financial year starting with the first full financial year after that date, and the operator must publish the disclosure within 12 months after the end of the covered financial year. This format timing does not erase the underlying Article 24 duty for the first full financial year after ESPR entered into force; keep the pre-format and post-format reporting periods separately documented.

Disclosure and prohibition are linked but separate. Article 24 requires publication of information about discarded unsold consumer products. Article 25 prohibits destruction only for unsold consumer products listed in Annex VII, and the initial Annex VII list covers apparel and clothing accessories plus footwear commodity-code entries.

Article 25 also says economic operators not subject to the prohibition must not destroy unsold consumer products supplied to them for the purpose of circumventing the prohibition. Article 25 lets the Commission amend Annex VII and set derogations, but this FAQ should not turn those powers into current exemptions or extra product bans unless cited sources support them.

Article 24 covers unsold consumer products that are discarded. It is not a general disclosure rule for every inventory adjustment, write-down, component, intermediate input, return, or waste stream unless the facts fit that wording.

Operator size and role also matter. Article 24 addresses economic operators that discard the products or have them discarded on their behalf. Micro and small enterprises are outside Article 24(1), while medium-sized enterprises enter the Article 24(1) duty from 19 July 2030. Article 25 separately allows delegated acts to apply the disclosure obligation or destruction prohibition to micro and small enterprises where evidence shows they could be used to circumvent those rules.

Article 24 requires more than a public web page. If the Commission or a competent national authority asks, the operator must provide the information and documentation necessary to demonstrate delivery and reception of the discarded products disclosed under Article 24(1)(c), and where relevant the information needed to demonstrate an Article 25(5) derogation.

The evidence file should therefore tie the public disclosure back to product counts, product weight, product type or category, discard reasons, recipient or treatment route, waste-hierarchy activity, planned prevention measures, and any claimed derogation. Article 24 says that requested documentation must be provided in paper or electronic form within 30 days of receiving the request.

No. ESPR sets a horizontal framework. Article 9 says information requirements shall provide that products can be placed on the market or put into service only if a Digital Product Passport is available in accordance with the applicable delegated act and Articles 10 and 11.

The operative obligation depends on the product rule. First identify whether an ESPR delegated act covers the product group, then read that act for the required data, carrier, passport level, access rights, update rights, and availability period.

The delegated act is where ESPR turns the passport framework into product-group instructions. Article 9 requires delegated acts to specify the passport data, data carrier, carrier layout and position, whether the passport is at model, batch or item level, customer pre-contract access, stakeholder access rights, who may create or update data, update arrangements, and how long the passport remains available.

Annex III lists candidate data categories, including the unique product identifier, commodity codes, compliance documentation, user manuals or warnings, manufacturer and importer information, operator and facility identifiers, and the DPP service provider hosting the back-up copy. It does not mean every listed element is mandatory for every product.

Article 10 requires the passport to be connected through a data carrier to a persistent unique product identifier. The data carrier must be physically present on the product, packaging, or accompanying documentation as specified in the applicable delegated act.

Article 11 adds technical design requirements: passports must be interoperable, access must be free of charge and easy based on delegated-act access rights, data and update rights must be controlled, reliability and integrity must be ensured, and the passport must remain available for the specified period, including after insolvency, liquidation, or cessation of activity of the responsible operator.

Articles 12 to 14 cover unique identifiers, the Commission registry, and a public web portal for searching and comparing passport data according to access rights. The Commission launched the registry with a testing environment on 20 July 2026. The current testing phase precedes the first implementation deadline on 18 February 2027 for certain large batteries. The registry and portal do not replace the product-specific delegated act.

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2026/1778 enters into force on 6 August 2026 and sets the DPP registry process. For a product whose applicable Union rule requires both a passport and registry registration, a verified economic operator registers the passport at the model, batch, or item level required by that rule. The registry returns a unique registration identifier and can generate downloadable proof of registration. That proof remains available for 90 calendar days and can be regenerated. Automated registry checks and proof of registration do not establish substantive product compliance.

Map data lineage before fixing a field list. For each likely passport data point, identify the internal owner, supplier source, calculation method, update trigger, evidence location, access classification, and whether the field is required by law, proposed in draft product work, or voluntary.

Supplier evidence should be tied to the data it supports. CIRPASS and CEN-CENELEC materials both highlight practical design issues around supply-chain information exchange, interoperability, access control, traceability, and data availability, but they are not substitutes for the legal delegated act.

Do not state final DPP fields, universal product deadlines, penalties, certification obligations, or mandatory service-provider arrangements unless the claim is based on ESPR, an applicable delegated act, or a later binding act. The Commission consultation material shows that service-provider storage, management, and certification questions are still part of policy development.

For now, the reliable answer is conditional: ESPR defines the DPP framework, core technical and governance requirements, and delegated-act mechanism; product-specific obligations mature through the relevant delegated act and supporting standards or common specifications.

ESPR applies broadly to physical goods placed on the EU market or put into service, including components and intermediate products. Begin the scope review with the product, its route to the EU market, and whether it is a component or intermediate product rather than only a finished consumer item.

Do not treat broad ESPR scope as proof that a specific product already has detailed ecodesign limits, passport fields, test methods, or conformity routes. Those details depend on delegated acts adopted for the relevant product group.

Article 1 excludes food, feed, human and veterinary medicinal products, living plants, animals and micro-organisms, products of human origin, and plant or animal products relating directly to future reproduction. Certain vehicles are excluded only for product aspects covered by sector-specific EU legislation.

The vehicle exclusion is not a blanket exclusion for every vehicle-related product or aspect. The regulation also states in its recitals that e-bikes and e-scooters should not be excluded from ESPR scope.

A product's history can also change the analysis. The ESPR recitals say second-hand products originating within the EU, including products repaired or refurbished, do not have to comply with delegated acts that entered into force after their original placing on the market. Remanufactured products are treated as new products and are subject to ecodesign requirements when they fall within an applicable delegated act.