FAQ item index

Search every question across sub-FAQs

Find the exact question, open the source answer card, and copy a direct link to the anchored sub-FAQ response.

Indexed coverage
29of29items
Across 7 modules • Updated May 9, 2026
Author
Sorena AI
Published
May 9, 2026
Updated
May 9, 2026
What is the EU Digital Product Passport registry?

What should teams not assume about the registry?

Do not assume the registry is a public passport page, a compliance certificate, or a complete product-data store. ESPR makes the registry a secure identifier record, while the passport itself remains distributed across economic operators and service providers.

Do not assume the registry will expose every passport field. The regulation requires a secure registry for at least unique identifiers and, in customs cases, commodity codes, while any additional stored data must come from the delegated acts and the criteria set in Article 13.

  • Registry acknowledgement is not proof of compliance.
  • The registry is not the same thing as the public web portal.
  • Additional registry fields depend on delegated acts, not on page-level convenience.
  • Passport storage can remain decentralised even when registry data is centralised.
Citations
Regulation (EU) 2024/1781 (ESPR)

Articles 13 to 15 distinguish the secure registry, the web portal, customs checks, and the limits on what registry communication proves.

Which products come first for the EU Digital Product Passport?

Which products come first for the EU Digital Product Passport?

For binding passport planning, separate the battery passport from the ESPR Digital Product Passport. The Batteries Regulation says that from 18 February 2027 each LMT battery, each industrial battery with a capacity greater than 2 kWh, and each electric vehicle battery placed on the market or put into service must have an electronic battery passport.

For ESPR product groups, there is no single universal DPP start date in the grounded sources for this page. ESPR creates the framework, requires the Commission to prioritise product groups in a working plan, and makes product-specific passport obligations depend on delegated acts adopted for the product group.

  • Treat covered batteries as a separate first-passport workstream under Regulation (EU) 2023/1542.
  • Treat ESPR priority product groups as a watchlist for upcoming ecodesign and DPP requirements, not as automatic passport obligations.
  • Do not publish a product-group DPP launch date unless the applicable delegated act or official working-plan material supports it.
Citations
Which products come first for the EU Digital Product Passport?

Which ESPR product groups are priority candidates?

ESPR Article 18 sets the first working-plan priority list. The listed groups are iron and steel; aluminium; textiles, especially garments and footwear; furniture, including mattresses; tyres; detergents; paints; lubricants; chemicals; relevant energy-related products; and information and communication technology products and other electronics.

That list is useful for sequencing preparation because it tells product, sustainability, supply-chain, and data teams where to watch first. It does not answer the operational DPP questions by itself: what data must be in the passport, where the carrier sits, who gets which access rights, what conformity route applies, and when the product-specific requirements apply.

  • Start inventory work for products that fall into the Article 18 priority groups.
  • Keep batteries in a separate regulatory tracker because their passport rule is in the Batteries Regulation.
  • For each ESPR product group, link the watch item to the future delegated act rather than copying a generic DPP deadline across all products.
Citations
Which products come first for the EU Digital Product Passport?

Why does the delegated act matter?

Under ESPR, the delegated act is where the general framework becomes product-specific. ESPR Article 9 says products can be placed on the market or put into service only if a digital product passport is available in accordance with the applicable delegated acts, and Article 9 also says those acts specify which data must be included, the data carriers to be used, and how the carrier is presented and positioned.

That is why a company should avoid treating a priority category, a consultation, or a technical standard as the final compliance rule. They can justify early architecture work, but the delegated act is the source to check before locking product labels, QR placement, access tiers, registry fields, or contractual supplier data duties.

  • Create one tracking row per product group and delegated act, not one generic DPP row for every SKU.
  • Record the affected product models, market role, passport data owner, carrier decision owner, and supplier-data dependencies.
  • Update the row when the delegated act defines the product scope, data elements, carrier layout, access rights, conformity assessment route, and application timing.
Citations
Which products come first for the EU Digital Product Passport?

What should teams do now?

For batteries, build against the grounded Batteries Regulation passport scope if the business places covered LMT, industrial greater-than-2 kWh, or electric vehicle batteries on the EU market or puts them into service. That work should include the battery category decision, the responsible economic operator, QR-code access, and the information set in Annex XIII.

For ESPR products, prepare the parts that are unlikely to be wasted: product-group mapping, supplier data ownership, identifier strategy, data-quality controls, and change monitoring. Hold back from asserting final product-group passport dates, mandatory fields, or carrier layout until the delegated act for that group exists and has been reviewed.

  • Segment the portfolio into battery-passport products, ESPR Article 18 priority groups, and products not yet matched to a grounded DPP priority source.
  • Assign a regulatory owner for delegated-act monitoring and a data owner for each product family likely to need passport data.
  • For public pages, customer notices, supplier questionnaires, and internal roadmaps, label unfinalised ESPR product-group timing as dependent on the delegated act.
Citations
Who must create an EU Digital Product Passport?

Who is responsible for creating an EU Digital Product Passport?

For an ESPR product covered by a delegated act, start with the economic operator that places the product on the EU market or puts it into service. ESPR Article 10 requires that operator to make available a back-up copy of the DPP through a DPP service provider, and Article 13 requires that operator to upload the required registry data.

That does not mean every operator in the chain may freely decide who creates or updates the passport. Article 9 says the delegated act for the product group must specify the actors that create the DPP or update passport data, what data they may introduce or update, and the detailed arrangements for doing so.

  • Manufacturer-led placement: the manufacturer normally owns the product conformity file, DPP availability, and current passport content for products it places on the EU market or puts into service.
  • Imported product: the importer must check before placing the product on the EU market that a DPP is available in accordance with ESPR Article 9 and the applicable delegated act.
  • Distribution: the distributor must verify, before making a covered product available, that it is labelled or linked to a DPP where the delegated act requires it.
  • Updates: do not give write access broadly; follow the delegated act's rules on which actors may introduce or update which data.
Citations
Who must create an EU Digital Product Passport?

How do manufacturer, importer, and distributor duties differ?

The manufacturer obligation is the strongest anchor in ESPR. For covered products, Article 27 requires manufacturers to ensure the product is accompanied by required information and that a DPP is available, including a back-up copy of the most up-to-date passport version stored by a DPP service provider.

Importers and distributors are not passive. Before placing a covered product on the market, importers must ensure that the manufacturer has handled conformity assessment, required information, and DPP availability. Before making the product available, distributors must verify that the product is labelled or linked to a DPP where the delegated act requires it, and they must stop making it available if the product or manufacturer is not compliant.

  • Assign product accountability to the manufacturer or brand owner that controls design, technical documentation, declaration of conformity, and passport content.
  • For non-EU manufacturers, require the EU importer file to show that the passport exists, is accessible, and has the required back-up copy before market placement.
  • Give distributors and dealers a checkable acceptance rule: no required DPP link, data carrier, documents, or instructions means the product should not move forward.
  • Keep marketplace and distance-selling teams supplied with the data carrier copy or unique product identifier so customers can access required passport information before purchase where ESPR requires it.
Citations
Who must create an EU Digital Product Passport?

What responsibility do suppliers and service providers have?

Suppliers are usually data contributors, not the default public owner of the final-product passport. ESPR Article 38 says that, when the delegated act specifies it, supply-chain actors must provide relevant information free of charge to manufacturers, notified bodies, and competent national authorities, allow manufacturer assessment when information is absent, and enable verification of information related to their activities.

DPP service providers are different from suppliers. They may store or process passport data for the economic operator, but ESPR Article 11 limits their processing to what is necessary for the service unless specifically agreed with the operator placing the product on the market or putting it into service.

  • Put supplier evidence in contract and onboarding records: material composition, substance data, component identifiers, production or environmental data, and verification access where the delegated act requires those data.
  • Give suppliers clear data ownership and correction paths so the manufacturer can keep passport data accurate, complete, and up to date.
  • Treat service-provider hosting as governance infrastructure: back-up copy, availability, access control, security, privacy, and continuity after insolvency or cessation of activity.
  • Separate 'can contribute data' from 'is legally responsible for creating the passport' unless the delegated act assigns that creation or update role.
Citations
Who must create an EU Digital Product Passport?

What governance record should a company keep?

A useful DPP responsibility record should identify the legal trigger, the product group, the market-placement actor, the delegated-act rule, and the teams allowed to create or update passport data. It should also show how supplier data is requested, checked, corrected, and locked before publication.

Do not publish a fixed DPP responsibility answer for every product line before the product-specific delegated act exists. Instead, keep a product-group watchlist and convert it into binding owners once the delegated act defines the product scope, passport level, data content, access rights, creation and update actors, registry data, and application details.

  • Product identity: model, batch, or item level required by the delegated act.
  • Responsible operator: manufacturer, importer, authorised representative, dealer, distributor, fulfilment service provider, or other actor identified for the product fact pattern.
  • Passport operations: creator, updater, approval owner, service provider, back-up copy location, registry upload owner, and access-rights owner.
  • Supplier controls: data fields requested, supplier source, validation method, correction owner, and evidence retained for authority or notified-body checks.
  • Review trigger: delegated-act changes, product design changes, supplier changes, importer changes, DPP service-provider changes, or non-conformity concerns.
Citations
Page 2 of 2