Search every question across sub-FAQs

For products incorporating portable batteries, the default rule is end-user removability and replaceability throughout the lifetime of the product. The obligation applies to the whole portable battery, not to individual cells or other parts inside that battery.

For products incorporating LMT batteries, the default rule is different: the LMT battery, and the individual battery cells included in the pack, must be readily removable and replaceable by an independent professional throughout the lifetime of the product.

A portable battery is readily removable by the end user when it can be removed from the product with commercially available tools. Article 11 does not allow removal to depend on proprietary tools, thermal energy, or solvents. If a specialised tool is needed, it must be supplied free of charge with the product.

The Commission notice explains the end user as an adult without specific experience or qualifications for removing or replacing batteries. A design review should therefore test whether the published instructions, tool assumptions, fasteners, connectors, adhesives, enclosure, and hazard controls match that user profile.

For LMT batteries, Article 11 itself uses independent professionals as the required removal and replacement actor. The Commission notice describes independent professionals as independent operators with the technical competence and qualification to repair the product, or to restore battery function when cell-level work is performed.

For portable batteries, professional-only removal is a derogation from the end-user rule. Article 11 supports this only for listed categories, such as certain wet-environment appliances where safety requires it and certain professional medical imaging, radiotherapy, and in vitro diagnostic medical devices. The wet-environment derogation needs product documentation showing that end-user replacement would compromise safety and that redesign is not possible with the current state of the art without severely affecting health and safety or product performance and functionality.

Article 11 removes the portable-battery end-user obligation where continuity of power supply and a permanent battery connection are necessary for user and appliance safety, or for data integrity where the product's main function is to collect and supply data.

The Commission notice gives examples, but it also narrows the data-integrity logic: data collection as an additional feature is not enough, and a device that avoids integrity loss through non-volatile memory should not use that derogation. Treat each derogation as an evidence question, not a product-category shortcut.

Article 11 requires products incorporating portable batteries to be accompanied by instructions and safety information for use, removal, and replacement, made permanently available online on a public website in an easily understandable way for end users. The Commission notice also strongly recommends replacement instructions and compatible-battery technical specifications for portable and LMT batteries.

Portable batteries and LMT batteries must be available as spare parts for at least five years after the last unit of the equipment model is placed on the market, at a reasonable and non-discriminatory price for independent professionals and end users. Software must not block replacement with a compatible battery or compatible key components.

A useful Article 11 evidence file should let a product, legal, quality, or market-surveillance reviewer trace the answer from the incorporated battery category to the design choice. It should also show that the public instructions, spare parts route, and software behavior match the product actually placed on the market.

For exceptions, keep more than a conclusion. The file should show the safety, data-integrity, medical-device, wet-environment, type-approval, or other EU-law basis being relied on, the facts that satisfy it, and the reasons narrower design changes were not enough.

Article 8 first applies to industrial batteries, electric vehicle batteries, and starting, lighting and ignition batteries that contain cobalt, lead, lithium, or nickel in active materials. For those batteries, documentation of recovered-content shares applies from 18 August 2031.

LMT batteries are phased in separately. The information-documentation requirement applies to LMT batteries containing the same listed materials from 18 August 2033, and LMT batteries are included in the 2036 minimum-share threshold requirement.

The Article 8 material list is narrow: cobalt, lead, lithium, and nickel. For cobalt, lithium, and nickel, the documented share concerns material present in active materials and recovered from battery manufacturing waste or post-consumer waste. For lead, the documented share concerns lead present in the battery and recovered from waste.

Do not add copper, graphite, manganese, steel, aluminium, plastics, or broad recycled-content totals to this FAQ unless a later delegated act or amendment in the source material supports that addition. Article 8 allows the Commission to add other materials by delegated act where justified by battery-chemistry market developments, but the current grounded rule names only cobalt, lead, lithium, and nickel.

From 18 August 2031, technical documentation for the first-wave battery categories must demonstrate minimum recovered-content shares of 16% cobalt, 85% lead, 6% lithium, and 6% nickel, where the battery contains the relevant material in active materials.

From 18 August 2036, the thresholds rise to 26% cobalt, 85% lead, 12% lithium, and 15% nickel, and the covered categories include industrial batteries above 2 kWh except those with exclusively external storage, electric vehicle batteries, LMT batteries, and SLI batteries. Article 8 also requires the Commission to assess whether the targets should be revised after the delegated methodology enters into force and no later than 31 December 2028.

Article 8 documentation is organized by battery model, year, and manufacturing plant. Annex VIII then makes that documentation auditable: technical documentation must include a study supporting the recycled content share, the calculations made under the Article 8 delegated methodology, and the evidence and information determining the input data for those calculations.

For manufacturers using the quality-assurance production-process module, the quality system should also document how the parameters and data needed to calculate and update the Article 8 recycled content share are monitored. The notified body audit checks the reliability of the recycled-content data and whether the calculation methodology has been properly implemented.

No. Article 8 instructs the Commission to adopt a delegated act by 18 August 2026 establishing the calculation and verification methodology for recycled-content percentage shares and the documentation format. The grounding reviewed for this FAQ did not include an adopted Article 8 recycled-content methodology.

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2025/606 is related but different. It establishes methodology and documentation for recycler recycling-efficiency rates and recovery-of-materials rates from waste batteries, including cobalt, copper, lead, lithium, and nickel. Those recycler records can be relevant upstream evidence, but they should not be cited as the Article 8 battery-model recycled-content methodology.

Annex XIII starts with a public category for information relating to the battery model. Teams should treat this as model-level information that can be shown to the general public, not as live operating data for a specific battery in use.

The public model-level group covers information such as Annex VI general battery information, material composition, carbon footprint information, responsible sourcing information, recycled content information, selected performance characteristics, marking information, the EU declaration of conformity, and waste-battery prevention and management information. Do not publish a custom expanded list unless each field is mapped back to Annex XIII or a delegated act that changes it.

Annex XIII creates restricted groups rather than a single private bucket. Some battery-model information is available only to persons with a legitimate interest and the Commission, some test-report information is available only to notified bodies, market surveillance authorities and the Commission, and individual-battery information is available only to persons with a legitimate interest.

The practical point is access design: repairers, remanufacturers, second-life operators, recyclers, purchasers, authorities, notified bodies, and the Commission do not all receive the same view. Article 77 also says the Commission must specify which persons count as having a legitimate interest and what they may download, share, publish, or re-use.

Use the Regulation's own split as the data-model boundary. Article 77 says the passport contains information relating to the battery model and information specific to the individual battery, including information resulting from use. Annex XIII then assigns access categories to those groups.

Model data should describe the battery model and its regulated characteristics. Individual-battery data should follow the specific unit through status changes, use-derived measurements, state-of-health information, and events. When a battery is prepared for re-use, repurposed, remanufactured, or placed back on the market after such activity, Article 77 requires a new passport linked to the original passport or passports.

Article 77 requires the battery passport to be accessible through the QR code referred to in Article 13(6). That QR code links to a unique identifier attributed by the economic operator placing the battery on the market. The Regulation also points to ISO/IEC 15459 standards, or equivalents, for the QR code and unique identifier.

Article 78 adds the operating requirements. Access must be free of charge and based on the access rights in Annex XIII and the Article 77 implementing act. Passport data must use open standards, be interoperable, machine-readable, structured and searchable, and be protected by controls for authentication, integrity, security, privacy, and restricted update rights.

Use the Article 3 category definitions in this order because the definitions exclude each other in important places. Route as an EV battery when it is specifically designed for traction in covered hybrid or electric vehicles. Route as an LMT battery when it is sealed, weighs 25 kg or less, is specifically designed for traction in qualifying wheeled light transport, and is not an EV battery.

Route as an SLI battery when it is specifically designed for starting, lighting or ignition, including auxiliary or backup use in vehicles, transport or machinery. Route as a portable battery only when it is sealed, weighs 5 kg or less, is not designed specifically for industrial use, and is not EV, LMT or SLI. Route as an industrial battery when it is specifically designed for industrial use, intended for industrial use after repurposing, or weighs more than 5 kg without falling into the EV, LMT or SLI categories.

No. The Batteries Regulation says its scope covers batteries placed on the market or put into service in the Union regardless of whether they are incorporated into appliances, light means of transport or other vehicles, added to products, or supplied separately. Category routing should therefore classify the battery itself and then add the incorporated-product obligations that apply to the product context.

That matters most for portable and LMT batteries. Products incorporating portable batteries must support end-user removability and replaceability unless a stated derogation applies. Products incorporating LMT batteries must support removal and replacement by an independent professional, including the battery cells in the battery pack.

Do not choose the lowest-burden label while facts remain unresolved. The safer operational approach is to record every plausible category, identify the facts that would decide between them, and block release or reporting until the product owner, regulatory owner and supplier can support one classification with evidence.

Once the category is resolved, route every obligation triggered by that category, capacity and use case. For example, Article 7 carbon-footprint obligations focus on EV batteries, rechargeable industrial batteries above 2 kWh and LMT batteries. Article 8 recycled-content obligations cover industrial batteries above 2 kWh, EV batteries, SLI batteries and later LMT batteries when the specified active materials are present. Article 77 battery passports apply to LMT batteries, industrial batteries above 2 kWh and EV batteries.

After classification, route obligations by category, capacity, chemistry, active materials, incorporated-product context and economic-operator role. Category routing is not only a scope question; it decides which teams own product design, technical documentation, supplier data, conformity assessment, CE marking, declarations, passport data, end-of-life collection and public information.

For market access, manufacturers should expect technical documentation and an EU declaration of conformity to reflect the applicable requirements. Where conformity assessment applies, Article 17 separates procedures for safety, performance, durability, labelling and information requirements from procedures for carbon footprint and recycled content requirements.

Keep enough evidence for a reviewer to understand why the battery was treated as portable, LMT, SLI, EV or industrial and which obligations were then triggered. The evidence should be maintained at battery-model level and linked to the finished product or vehicle only where that context affects classification or incorporated-product obligations.

For each battery model, retain the facts used to classify the battery, the obligation list produced from that classification, and the owner for each follow-up artifact. Evidence should be updated when weight, intended use, vehicle category, battery-management features, active materials, repurposing status, supplier data or incorporated-product design changes.