--- title: "How should teams handle code scanning under NIST SP 800-218 SSDF?" canonical_url: "https://www.sorena.io/artifacts/global/nist-sp-800-218-ssdf/faq/code-scanning" source_url: "https://www.sorena.io/artifacts/global/nist-sp-800-218-ssdf/faq/code-scanning" author: "Sorena AI" description: "How should teams handle code scanning under NIST SP 800-218 SSDF? Clear, source-linked guidance with practical evidence checks, owner decisions, and implementation steps." published_at: "2026-05-09" updated_at: "2026-05-09" keywords: - "NIST SP 800-218 SSDF" - "Code Scanning" - "FAQ" - "compliance evidence" - "source-linked guidance" - "NIST SP 800-218" - "SSDF" - "Secure software development" --- **[SORENA](https://www.sorena.io/)** - AI-Powered GRC Platform [Home](https://www.sorena.io/) | [Solutions](https://www.sorena.io/solutions) | [Artifacts](https://www.sorena.io/artifacts) | [About Us](https://www.sorena.io/about-us) | [Contact](https://www.sorena.io/contact) | [Portal](https://app.sorena.io) --- # How should teams handle code scanning under NIST SP 800-218 SSDF? How should teams handle code scanning under NIST SP 800-218 SSDF? Clear, source-linked guidance with practical evidence checks, owner decisions, and implementation steps. *FAQ* *GLOBAL* *NIST SP 800-218 SSDF* ## NIST SP 800-218 SSDF How should teams handle code scanning under NIST SP 800-218 SSDF A direct FAQ answer for teams deciding when code scanning, code review, and code analysis should be used under NIST SP 800-218 SSDF. Grounded in NIST SSDF guidance, this page points to the review, analysis, and testing practices that help teams decide what evidence to keep and who should own the decision. Short answer: use code scanning as part of the SSDF process for reviewing, analyzing, and testing code. NIST SP 800-218 says teams should decide whether code review, code analysis, and executable testing are needed, then record findings and remediations in the workflow or issue tracking system. ## When should teams use code scanning under NIST SP 800-218 SSDF? Use code scanning when your secure development process calls for code analysis, code review, or executable testing to find issues before release. NIST SP 800-218 recommends deciding whether review and analysis should be used, and it also recommends testing executable code to find vulnerabilities not identified earlier. The decision should be tied to your organization’s secure coding standards and to the stage of the software. If code scanning is used, keep the results, the triage decisions, and the recommended remediations in your workflow or issue tracking system. - Decide whether code review, code analysis, and/or executable testing is needed. - Use the organization’s secure coding standards to guide what the scans should look for. - Record discovered issues and recommended remediations in workflow or issue tracking systems. - Re-scan when code changes, risks change, or prior findings were not fully resolved. Sources for this answer: - [NIST SP 800-218 SSDF v1.1](https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-218?ref=sorena.io) - Primary NIST source for the Secure Software Development Framework. - [NIST SP 800-218 SSDF v1.1](https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-218?ref=sorena.io) - Primary NIST source for the Secure Software Development Framework. - [NIST SP 800-218 SSDF v1.1](https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-218?ref=sorena.io) - Primary NIST source for the Secure Software Development Framework. ## What evidence should support code scanning under NIST SP 800-218 SSDF? Apply NIST SP 800-218 SSDF criteria to document code scanning evidence that can sustain review: define covered repositories and scan types, retain findings and remediation records, assign ownership, document accepted gaps, and set a reassessment trigger. - Write the decision and scope in one sentence. - Attach the source-linked evidence that proves the current state. - Name the accountable owner and backup reviewer. - Record unresolved gaps, accepted risk, and dependencies. - Set a date or event trigger for reassessment. Sources for this answer: - [NIST SP 800-218 SSDF v1.1](https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-218?ref=sorena.io) - Primary NIST source for the Secure Software Development Framework. - [NIST SP 800-218 SSDF v1.1](https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-218?ref=sorena.io) - Primary NIST source for the Secure Software Development Framework. - [NIST SP 800-218 SSDF v1.1](https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-218?ref=sorena.io) - Primary NIST source for the Secure Software Development Framework. ## Primary sources - [NIST SP 800-218 SSDF v1.1](https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-218?ref=sorena.io) - Primary NIST source for the Secure Software Development Framework. - Quote: "core set of high-level secure software development practices" - [NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 Controls](https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-53r5?ref=sorena.io) - Primary NIST source for the integrated security and privacy control catalog. - Quote: "catalog of security and privacy controls" - [NIST SP 800-161 Rev. 1 Update 1 C-SCRM](https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-161r1-upd1?ref=sorena.io) - Primary NIST source for cybersecurity supply chain risk management practices. - Quote: "identifying, assessing, and mitigating cybersecurity risks" ## Topic Guides - [How should teams handle components under NIST SP 800-218 SSDF?](/artifacts/global/nist-sp-800-218-ssdf/faq/components.md): How should teams handle components under NIST SP 800-218 SSDF? Clear, source-linked guidance with practical evidence checks, owner decisions, and implementation steps. - [How should teams handle release gates under NIST SP 800-218 SSDF?](/artifacts/global/nist-sp-800-218-ssdf/faq/release-gates.md): How should teams handle release gates under NIST SP 800-218 SSDF? Clear, source-linked guidance with practical evidence checks, owner decisions, and implementation steps. - [How should teams handle threat modeling under NIST SP 800-218 SSDF?](/artifacts/global/nist-sp-800-218-ssdf/faq/threat-modeling.md): How should teams handle threat modeling under NIST SP 800-218 SSDF? Clear, source-linked guidance with practical evidence checks, owner decisions, and implementation steps. - [How should teams handle vulnerability disclosure under NIST SP 800-218 SSDF?](/artifacts/global/nist-sp-800-218-ssdf/faq/vulnerability-disclosure.md): How should teams handle vulnerability disclosure under NIST SP 800-218 SSDF? Clear, source-linked guidance with practical evidence checks, owner decisions, and implementation steps. - [NIST SP 800-218 SSDF compliance playbook](/artifacts/global/nist-sp-800-218-ssdf/compliance.md): Practical NIST SP 800-218 SSDF compliance playbook guidance with source-linked decisions, owner checklists, evidence records, and implementation steps. - [NIST SP 800-218 SSDF Evidence for Audits Guide](/artifacts/global/nist-sp-800-218-ssdf/evidence-for-audits.md): Practical NIST SP 800-218 SSDF Evidence for Audits Guide guidance with source-linked decisions, owner checklists, evidence records, and implementation steps. - [NIST SP 800-218 SSDF FAQ: practical implementation questions](/artifacts/global/nist-sp-800-218-ssdf/faq.md): Standalone NIST SP 800-218 SSDF FAQ questions with source-linked answers, implementation checklists, and evidence guidance. - [NIST SP 800-218 SSDF PO, PS, PW, and RV Practice Deep Dive](/artifacts/global/nist-sp-800-218-ssdf/practice-groups.md): Practical NIST SP 800-218 SSDF PO, PS, PW, and RV Practice Deep Dive guidance with source-linked decisions, owner checklists, evidence records, and implementation steps. - [NIST SP 800-218 SSDF SBOM and Provenance Workflow](/artifacts/global/nist-sp-800-218-ssdf/sbom-and-provenance-workflow.md): Practical NIST SP 800-218 SSDF SBOM and Provenance Workflow guidance with source-linked decisions, owner checklists, evidence records, and implementation steps. - [NIST SP 800-218 SSDF Secure Development Practices Guide](/artifacts/global/nist-sp-800-218-ssdf/secure-development-practices.md): Practical NIST SP 800-218 SSDF Secure Development Practices Guide guidance with source-linked decisions, owner checklists, evidence records, and implementation steps. - [NIST SP 800-218 SSDF Self-Attestation Guide](/artifacts/global/nist-sp-800-218-ssdf/ssdf-self-attestation.md): Practical NIST SP 800-218 SSDF Self-Attestation Guide guidance with source-linked decisions, owner checklists, evidence records, and implementation steps. - [NIST SP 800-218 SSDF Self-Attestation Workflow](/artifacts/global/nist-sp-800-218-ssdf/ssdf-self-attestation-workflow.md): A practical NIST SP 800-218 SSDF Self-Attestation Workflow with steps, owners, evidence fields, decisions, and source-linked review triggers. - [NIST SSDF vs NIST SP 800-53 SA controls: practical side-by-side comparison](/artifacts/global/nist-sp-800-218-ssdf/ssdf-vs-nist-800-53-sa-controls.md): Compare NIST SSDF and NIST SP 800-53 SA controls with side-by-side scope, owner, trigger, evidence, cadence, assurance, and decision-rule rows. - [NIST SSDF vs SLSA: practical side-by-side comparison](/artifacts/global/nist-sp-800-218-ssdf/ssdf-vs-slsa.md): Compare NIST SSDF and SLSA with side-by-side scope, owner, trigger, evidence, cadence, assurance, and decision-rule rows. - [NIST SSDF vs SP 800-53 SA controls: practice-to-control mapping table](/artifacts/global/nist-sp-800-218-ssdf/ssdf-vs-800-53-sa-controls.md): Compare NIST SSDF and NIST SP 800-53 SA controls with side-by-side scope, owner, trigger, evidence, cadence, assurance, and decision-rule rows. - [What build integrity should teams keep for NIST SSDF SP 800-218?](/artifacts/global/nist-sp-800-218-ssdf/faq/build-integrity.md): What build integrity should teams keep for NIST SSDF SP 800-218. Clear, source-linked guidance with practical evidence checks, owner decisions, and implementation steps. - [What secure coding evidence should teams keep for NIST SSDF SP 800-218?](/artifacts/global/nist-sp-800-218-ssdf/faq/secure-coding-evidence.md): What secure coding evidence should teams keep for NIST SSDF SP 800-218. Clear, source-linked guidance with practical evidence checks, owner decisions, and implementation steps. - [Why does provenance matter in NIST SP 800-218 SSDF implementation?](/artifacts/global/nist-sp-800-218-ssdf/faq/provenance.md): Provenance matters in NIST SP 800-218 SSDF implementation because teams need reviewable evidence for source, dependencies, build process, approvals, and software artifact lineage. *Recommended next step* *Placement: after the practical workflow* ## Put this NIST SSDF guidance into practice Use the cited sources to make this page operational: define the exact SSDF scope, assign owners, list required artifacts, and set the review gate before moving forward. - [Open Assessment Autopilot for NIST SSDF](/solutions/assessment.md): Create source-linked tasks, evidence requests, and review checkpoints for this NIST SSDF scope. - [Review this NIST SSDF scope with Sorena](/contact.md): Check source coverage, ownership, evidence gaps, and next steps before publishing or operationalizing the work. --- [Privacy Policy](https://www.sorena.io/privacy) | [Terms of Use](https://www.sorena.io/terms-of-use) | [DMCA](https://www.sorena.io/dmca) | [About Us](https://www.sorena.io/about-us) (c) 2026 Sorena AB (559573-7338). All rights reserved. Source: https://www.sorena.io/artifacts/global/nist-sp-800-218-ssdf/faq/code-scanning