--- title: "ISO/IEC 27017 CSP vs CSC Role Split Comparison" canonical_url: "https://www.sorena.io/artifacts/global/iso-27017/csp-vs-csc-role-split" source_url: "https://www.sorena.io/artifacts/global/iso-27017/csp-vs-csc-role-split" author: "Sorena AI" description: "CSP vs CSC Role Split for ISO/IEC 27017 Cloud Security Controls: practical decisions, evidence, owners, review cadence, and source-linked implementation guidance." published_at: "2026-05-09" updated_at: "2026-05-09" keywords: - "CSP vs CSC Role Split" - "ISO/IEC 27017" - "ISO/IEC 27017 Cloud Security Controls" - "CSP vs CSC Role Split checklist" - "CSP vs CSC Role Split evidence" - "CSP vs CSC Role Split implementation" - "global compliance" --- **[SORENA](https://www.sorena.io/)** - AI-Powered GRC Platform [Home](https://www.sorena.io/) | [Solutions](https://www.sorena.io/solutions) | [Artifacts](https://www.sorena.io/artifacts) | [About Us](https://www.sorena.io/about-us) | [Contact](https://www.sorena.io/contact) | [Portal](https://app.sorena.io) --- # ISO/IEC 27017 CSP vs CSC Role Split Comparison CSP vs CSC Role Split for ISO/IEC 27017 Cloud Security Controls: practical decisions, evidence, owners, review cadence, and source-linked implementation guidance. *Side-by-side* *Global* *ISO/IEC 27017* ## ISO/IEC 27017 CSP vs CSC Role Split CSP vs CSC Role Split should help teams make a decision, assign owners, and collect evidence under ISO/IEC 27017 Cloud Security Controls. Grounded in external ISO, NIST, EU, or framework sources where relevant. This is practical implementation guidance, supporting implementation planning and should be validated against jurisdiction-specific legal, contractual, and policy requirements before implementation. This ISO/IEC 27017 page helps teams make CSP vs CSC Role Split operational by defining the decision, assign owners, collect evidence, and review the record when the scope or risk changes. ## CSP vs CSC Role Split: scope, duties, evidence, and decision rule This comparison helps determine when CSP is the right operating model, when CSC Role Split controls the analysis, and how to reuse evidence without mixing sources. - **CSP**: CSP is the primary scoping column: use it to confirm covered facts, accountable owners, mandatory artifacts, timing, and enforcement exposure before assigning implementation work. - **CSC Role Split**: CSC Role Split is the second workstream in this comparison. This section tests where the comparator has different scope, owners, triggers, evidence, timing, enforcement, and reuse limits from CSP. | Dimension | CSP | CSC Role Split | Operational implication | Sources | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Scope and covered activity | CSP covers the cloud service provider side of the split: the infrastructure, platform, and service operations the provider controls and documents as provider responsibility, including the boundary where customer-managed workloads begin. | CSC Role Split covers the customer side of the split: the workloads, data, identities, configurations, and customer decisions that remain customer responsibility after the provider boundary is fixed. | Write the scope memo so teams can see when the provider owns the control, when the customer owns it, and when the same control is shared across both sides. | [ISO - Standards overview](https://www.iso.org/standards.html?ref=sorena.io) - Explains what ISO standards are and how organizations use them. | | Who must act | CSP ownership should sit with the cloud provider team that can operate the shared service, maintain logs and assurance evidence, and answer customer questions about the provider-controlled environment. | CSC Role Split ownership should sit with the customer team that can configure the workload, approve data and access choices, and produce customer-side evidence for its own part of the split. | Do not copy owners from one side to the other; map the provider owner, customer owner, reviewer, and approver separately. | [ISO - Standards overview](https://www.iso.org/standards.html?ref=sorena.io) - Explains what ISO standards are and how organizations use them. | | Trigger or threshold | CSP work is triggered when the provider changes the service, introduces a new shared control, updates assurance evidence, or revises the service boundary that customers rely on. | CSC Role Split work is triggered when the customer changes a workload, changes data handling or access decisions, or needs to re-map its own duties against the provider boundary. | Use the trigger to route intake: provider change, customer change, assurance refresh, contract update, or operational incident. | [ISO - Standards overview](https://www.iso.org/standards.html?ref=sorena.io) - Explains what ISO standards are and how organizations use them. | | Core obligations | CSP requires the provider to maintain the cloud service controls it advertises: defined scope, accountable roles, current logs or reports, and a repeatable review cycle that shows the provider side still works as designed. | CSC Role Split requires the customer to carry out its own duties on top of the provider service: workload configuration, access decisions, data handling choices, and customer-side evidence that its responsibilities were met. | Translate both sides into a single task register only after labeling which requirement or guidance source each task satisfies. | [ISO - Standards overview](https://www.iso.org/standards.html?ref=sorena.io) - Explains what ISO standards are and how organizations use them. | | Evidence and records | CSP evidence should show the provider-side process operating: service descriptions, shared responsibility matrices, support tickets, control operation records, test results, review minutes, and assurance reports. | CSC Role Split evidence should show the customer-side process operating: configuration records, access approvals, workload change records, local review minutes, and customer approvals tied to the shared responsibility matrix. | Build an evidence matrix with one row per claim and columns for source, owner, artifact, date, review trigger, and reuse permission. | [ISO - Standards overview](https://www.iso.org/standards.html?ref=sorena.io) - Explains what ISO standards are and how organizations use them. | | Timing and cadence | CSP timing follows provider release cycles, scheduled assurance reviews, incident response, supplier review, and service changes rather than a single universal deadline. | CSC Role Split timing follows the customer's configuration changes, access reviews, contract milestones, risk reviews, or the date on which a shared control must be revalidated. | Track dates separately so a provider review cycle does not get mistaken for the customer's own revalidation date. | [ISO - Standards overview](https://www.iso.org/standards.html?ref=sorena.io) - Explains what ISO standards are and how organizations use them. | | Enforcement or assurance route | CSP is usually tested through provider audits, customer assurance, management review, or contractual assurance requests that ask the provider to prove its service controls. | CSC Role Split may be enforced through the customer's own audits, internal reviews, attestations, or customer assurance checks on the customer-managed side of the service. | Separate audit readiness from legal compliance and from voluntary framework maturity so executives see the actual consequence of gaps. | [ISO - Standards overview](https://www.iso.org/standards.html?ref=sorena.io) - Explains what ISO standards are and how organizations use them. | | Overlap and reuse | CSP can supply reusable provider evidence such as reports, logs, service descriptions, and review outputs when the customer is asking the provider to prove the shared service side. | CSC Role Split can reuse that evidence only when the customer requirement truly matches the provider artifact and the customer still has a separate record for its own obligations. | Reuse evidence only after checking scope, actor, date, data type, service, supplier, and acceptance criteria; otherwise keep separate records. | [ISO - Standards overview](https://www.iso.org/standards.html?ref=sorena.io) - Explains what ISO standards are and how organizations use them. | | Practical decision rule | Use CSP when the main work is proving the provider-side service, control, or assurance model. | Use CSC Role Split when the main work is proving the customer-side configuration, data handling, access, or local approvals that sit on top of the provider service. | If both apply, keep the provider obligation visible and use the customer record as supporting structure, not as a substitute source. | [ISO - Standards overview](https://www.iso.org/standards.html?ref=sorena.io) - Explains what ISO standards are and how organizations use them. | Sources for Scope and covered activity - CSP: - [ISO - Standards overview](https://www.iso.org/standards.html?ref=sorena.io) - Supports the role-split framing by explaining standards as agreed ways to make repeatable work auditable; use ISO/IEC 27017 for cloud-specific control guidance. - Quote: "Think of them as a formula that describes the best way of doing something." Sources for Scope and covered activity - CSC Role Split: - [ISO - Standards overview](https://www.iso.org/standards.html?ref=sorena.io) - Explains what ISO standards are and how organizations use them. - Quote: "Think of them as a formula that describes the best way of doing something." Sources for Scope and covered activity - operational implication: - [ISO - Standards overview](https://www.iso.org/standards.html?ref=sorena.io) - Explains what ISO standards are and how organizations use them. - Quote: "Think of them as a formula that describes the best way of doing something." Sources for Who must act - CSP: - [ISO - Standards overview](https://www.iso.org/standards.html?ref=sorena.io) - Explains what ISO standards are and how organizations use them. - Quote: "Think of them as a formula that describes the best way of doing something." Sources for Who must act - CSC Role Split: - [ISO - Standards overview](https://www.iso.org/standards.html?ref=sorena.io) - Explains what ISO standards are and how organizations use them. - Quote: "Think of them as a formula that describes the best way of doing something." Sources for Who must act - operational implication: - [ISO - Standards overview](https://www.iso.org/standards.html?ref=sorena.io) - Explains what ISO standards are and how organizations use them. - Quote: "Think of them as a formula that describes the best way of doing something." Sources for Trigger or threshold - CSP: - [ISO - Standards overview](https://www.iso.org/standards.html?ref=sorena.io) - Explains what ISO standards are and how organizations use them. - Quote: "Think of them as a formula that describes the best way of doing something." Sources for Trigger or threshold - CSC Role Split: - [ISO - Standards overview](https://www.iso.org/standards.html?ref=sorena.io) - Explains what ISO standards are and how organizations use them. - Quote: "Think of them as a formula that describes the best way of doing something." Sources for Trigger or threshold - operational implication: - [ISO - Standards overview](https://www.iso.org/standards.html?ref=sorena.io) - Explains what ISO standards are and how organizations use them. - Quote: "Think of them as a formula that describes the best way of doing something." Sources for Core obligations - CSP: - [ISO - Standards overview](https://www.iso.org/standards.html?ref=sorena.io) - Explains what ISO standards are and how organizations use them. - Quote: "Think of them as a formula that describes the best way of doing something." Sources for Core obligations - CSC Role Split: - [ISO - Standards overview](https://www.iso.org/standards.html?ref=sorena.io) - Explains what ISO standards are and how organizations use them. - Quote: "Think of them as a formula that describes the best way of doing something." Sources for Core obligations - operational implication: - [ISO - Standards overview](https://www.iso.org/standards.html?ref=sorena.io) - Explains what ISO standards are and how organizations use them. - Quote: "Think of them as a formula that describes the best way of doing something." Sources for Evidence and records - CSP: - [ISO - Standards overview](https://www.iso.org/standards.html?ref=sorena.io) - Explains what ISO standards are and how organizations use them. - Quote: "Think of them as a formula that describes the best way of doing something." Sources for Evidence and records - CSC Role Split: - [ISO - Standards overview](https://www.iso.org/standards.html?ref=sorena.io) - Explains what ISO standards are and how organizations use them. - Quote: "Think of them as a formula that describes the best way of doing something." Sources for Evidence and records - operational implication: - [ISO - Standards overview](https://www.iso.org/standards.html?ref=sorena.io) - Explains what ISO standards are and how organizations use them. - Quote: "Think of them as a formula that describes the best way of doing something." Sources for Timing and cadence - CSP: - [ISO - Standards overview](https://www.iso.org/standards.html?ref=sorena.io) - Explains what ISO standards are and how organizations use them. - Quote: "Think of them as a formula that describes the best way of doing something." Sources for Timing and cadence - CSC Role Split: - [ISO - Standards overview](https://www.iso.org/standards.html?ref=sorena.io) - Explains what ISO standards are and how organizations use them. - Quote: "Think of them as a formula that describes the best way of doing something." Sources for Timing and cadence - operational implication: - [ISO - Standards overview](https://www.iso.org/standards.html?ref=sorena.io) - Explains what ISO standards are and how organizations use them. - Quote: "Think of them as a formula that describes the best way of doing something." Sources for Enforcement or assurance route - CSP: - [ISO - Standards overview](https://www.iso.org/standards.html?ref=sorena.io) - Explains what ISO standards are and how organizations use them. - Quote: "Think of them as a formula that describes the best way of doing something." Sources for Enforcement or assurance route - CSC Role Split: - [ISO - Standards overview](https://www.iso.org/standards.html?ref=sorena.io) - Explains what ISO standards are and how organizations use them. - Quote: "Think of them as a formula that describes the best way of doing something." Sources for Enforcement or assurance route - operational implication: - [ISO - Standards overview](https://www.iso.org/standards.html?ref=sorena.io) - Explains what ISO standards are and how organizations use them. - Quote: "Think of them as a formula that describes the best way of doing something." Sources for Overlap and reuse - CSP: - [ISO - Standards overview](https://www.iso.org/standards.html?ref=sorena.io) - Explains what ISO standards are and how organizations use them. - Quote: "Think of them as a formula that describes the best way of doing something." Sources for Overlap and reuse - CSC Role Split: - [ISO - Standards overview](https://www.iso.org/standards.html?ref=sorena.io) - Explains what ISO standards are and how organizations use them. - Quote: "Think of them as a formula that describes the best way of doing something." Sources for Overlap and reuse - operational implication: - [ISO - Standards overview](https://www.iso.org/standards.html?ref=sorena.io) - Explains what ISO standards are and how organizations use them. - Quote: "Think of them as a formula that describes the best way of doing something." Sources for Practical decision rule - CSP: - [ISO - Standards overview](https://www.iso.org/standards.html?ref=sorena.io) - Explains what ISO standards are and how organizations use them. - Quote: "Think of them as a formula that describes the best way of doing something." Sources for Practical decision rule - CSC Role Split: - [ISO - Standards overview](https://www.iso.org/standards.html?ref=sorena.io) - Explains what ISO standards are and how organizations use them. - Quote: "Think of them as a formula that describes the best way of doing something." Sources for Practical decision rule - operational implication: - [ISO - Standards overview](https://www.iso.org/standards.html?ref=sorena.io) - Explains what ISO standards are and how organizations use them. - Quote: "Think of them as a formula that describes the best way of doing something." ### How should teams decide between CSP and CSC Role Split for compliance planning? - Start with the trigger: certification, risk review, cloud/customer assurance, incident, supplier, privacy, AI governance, law, or framework mapping. - Identify the binding or chosen source for each claim before assigning controls or collecting evidence. - Reuse evidence only where the same owner, scope, time period, system, supplier, data type, and acceptance criteria apply. Sources for the practical decision rule: - [ISO - Standards overview](https://www.iso.org/standards.html?ref=sorena.io) - Explains what ISO standards are and how organizations use them. - Quote: "Think of them as a formula that describes the best way of doing something." ## What decision should teams make about CSP vs CSC Role Split under ISO/IEC 27017 Cloud Security Controls? For cloud security work, write the provider/customer split before requesting evidence; the same control can be provider-owned, customer-owned, or shared depending on the service model and contract. The first decision is whether CSP vs CSC Role Split changes scope, risk, control selection, evidence, certification readiness, customer commitments, or regulatory mapping. If it does, treat it as an accountable management-system decision rather than a side note. ISO/IEC 27017 is useful when it turns broad intent into repeatable work: make cloud security responsibilities explicit between cloud service providers and cloud service customers. The page therefore ends in ownership, evidence, and review cadence, not only a definition. - Define the scope for CSP vs CSC Role Split before assigning controls or requesting evidence. - Tie each claim to a decision record, an owner, and current evidence rather than a policy label alone. - Review the record whenever before selecting cloud services, when responsibility boundaries change, after major architecture changes, and during supplier or customer assurance reviews. Sources for this answer: - [ISO/IEC 27017:2015 standard page](https://www.iso.org/standard/43757.html?ref=sorena.io) - Primary ISO listing for cloud-service security control guidance. - [ISO/IEC 27002:2022 standard page](https://www.iso.org/standard/75652.html?ref=sorena.io) - Primary ISO listing for the ISO/IEC 27002 information security control guidance standard. ## Which records should prove CSP vs CSC Role Split is implemented correctly? Evidence should be collected where the work actually happens. For ISO/IEC 27017, that usually means shared-responsibility matrices, cloud service agreements, provider assurance reports, customer configuration baselines, privileged access reviews, logging records, vulnerability handling, and change records. A strong evidence set tells a visitor, auditor, customer, or decision owner what was decided, why it was reasonable, who approved it, and when it must be reviewed again. - Artifact-specific evidence: shared-responsibility matrix, cloud service agreement, provider assurance, customer configuration evidence, access reviews, logs, and change records. - Decision record: scope, assumption, risk or obligation, owner, approval, and date. - Operation record: ticket, log, review, test, contract clause, register entry, or control sample showing the process ran. - Review record: result, exception, corrective action, next owner, and next review date. Sources for this answer: - [ISO/IEC 27002:2022 standard page](https://www.iso.org/standard/75652.html?ref=sorena.io) - Primary ISO listing for the ISO/IEC 27002 information security control guidance standard. - [ISO/IEC 27001:2022 standard page](https://www.iso.org/standard/27001?ref=sorena.io) - Primary ISO listing for the current ISO/IEC 27001 ISMS requirements standard. ## How should teams turn CSP vs CSC Role Split into a repeatable workflow? Build the workflow around a small number of durable checkpoints: intake, classification, owner assignment, evidence request, decision, review, and escalation. This keeps the work usable across audits, customer assurance, and operational reviews. Avoid overfitting the workflow to one audit cycle. The same record should help during normal operations, change review, incident response, supplier review, or management review depending on the topic. - Intake: describe the system, service, supplier, control, incident, AI system, or process affected. - Classification: decide whether this is scope, risk, treatment, evidence, contract, incident, privacy, continuity, or AI governance work. - Escalation: route exceptions to the person or forum that can accept risk or fund remediation. Sources for this answer: - [ISO/IEC 27001:2022 standard page](https://www.iso.org/standard/27001?ref=sorena.io) - Primary ISO listing for the current ISO/IEC 27001 ISMS requirements standard. - [ISO/IEC 27017:2015 standard page](https://www.iso.org/standard/43757.html?ref=sorena.io) - Primary ISO listing for cloud-service security control guidance. *Recommended next step* *Placement: after implementation guidance* ## Operationalize CSP vs CSC Role Split This ISO/IEC 27017 page supports a tracked workflow: assign owners, request evidence, record decisions, and keep review dates visible instead of leaving the guidance in a document. - [Open Assessment Autopilot for ISO/IEC 27017](/solutions/assessment.md): Convert CSP vs CSC Role Split into accountable tasks, evidence requests, and review checkpoints. - [Talk through ISO/IEC 27017 implementation](/contact.md): Review your current scope, evidence gaps, and next implementation steps. ## What mistakes make CSP vs CSC Role Split weak or hard to audit? A strong page is reviewable when each recommendation is tied to five required elements: scope boundary, accountable owner, evidence source, change-trigger, and escalation path. If any element is missing, route it to a named owner for closure before reusing the guidance. Another failure is mixing standards and regulations without stating which source creates the requirement. Use ISO standards to structure management-system practice, and use legal sources separately when a binding obligation applies. - Do not cite a standard title as evidence that a process is operating. - Do not reuse an old audit artifact after the scope, service, supplier, or risk has changed. - Do not hide exceptions; record them as risk acceptance, corrective action, or management-review inputs. Sources for this answer: - [ISO/IEC 27017:2015 standard page](https://www.iso.org/standard/43757.html?ref=sorena.io) - Primary ISO listing for cloud-service security control guidance. - [ISO/IEC 27002:2022 standard page](https://www.iso.org/standard/75652.html?ref=sorena.io) - Primary ISO listing for the ISO/IEC 27002 information security control guidance standard. ## How should teams review and improve CSP vs CSC Role Split over time? Review should happen before selecting cloud services, when responsibility boundaries change, after major architecture changes, and during supplier or customer assurance reviews. If the review changes the decision, update the register, workflow, control evidence, or contract record that downstream teams rely on. Improvement is strongest when the same evidence supports multiple needs: certification audits, customer assurance, regulatory mapping, supplier governance, incident reviews, and management review. - Set a review date and a change-trigger rule. - Track findings until closure and connect them to corrective actions or risk acceptance. - Use management review to decide resourcing, risk appetite, scope changes, and evidence quality. Sources for this answer: - [ISO/IEC 27002:2022 standard page](https://www.iso.org/standard/75652.html?ref=sorena.io) - Primary ISO listing for the ISO/IEC 27002 information security control guidance standard. - [ISO/IEC 27001:2022 standard page](https://www.iso.org/standard/27001?ref=sorena.io) - Primary ISO listing for the current ISO/IEC 27001 ISMS requirements standard. ## Primary sources - [ISO/IEC 27017:2015 standard page](https://www.iso.org/standard/43757.html?ref=sorena.io) - Primary ISO listing for cloud-service security control guidance. - Quote: "Code of practice for information security controls based on ISO/IEC 27002 for cloud services" - [ISO/IEC 27002:2022 standard page](https://www.iso.org/standard/75652.html?ref=sorena.io) - Primary ISO listing for the ISO/IEC 27002 information security control guidance standard. - Quote: "Information security controls" - [ISO/IEC 27001:2022 standard page](https://www.iso.org/standard/27001?ref=sorena.io) - Primary ISO listing for the current ISO/IEC 27001 ISMS requirements standard. - Quote: "Information security management systems - Requirements" - [ISO - Standards overview](https://www.iso.org/standards.html?ref=sorena.io) - Explains what ISO standards are and how organizations use them. - Quote: "Think of them as a formula that describes the best way of doing something." ## Related Topic Guides - [ISO/IEC 27017 Audit Rights FAQ](/artifacts/global/iso-27017/faq/audit-rights.md): How should teams handle Audit Rights under ISO/IEC 27017? Practical answer with owners, evidence, review triggers, and external source references. - [ISO/IEC 27017 Certification Reality Guide](/artifacts/global/iso-27017/certification-reality.md): ISO/IEC 27017 Certification Reality for ISO/IEC 27017 Cloud Security Controls: practical decisions, evidence, owners, review cadence, and source-linked implementation guidance. - [ISO/IEC 27017 Cloud Admin Access FAQ](/artifacts/global/iso-27017/faq/cloud-admin-access.md): How should teams handle Cloud Admin Access under ISO/IEC 27017? Practical answer with owners, evidence, review triggers, and external source references. - [ISO/IEC 27017 Cloud Provider Checklist Template and Workflow](/artifacts/global/iso-27017/cloud-provider-checklist.md): ISO/IEC 27017 Cloud Provider Checklist for ISO/IEC 27017 Cloud Security Controls: practical decisions, evidence, owners, review cadence, and source-linked implementation guidance. - [ISO/IEC 27017 Cloud Security FAQ](/artifacts/global/iso-27017/faq.md): ISO/IEC 27017 FAQ for ISO/IEC 27017 Cloud Security Controls: practical decisions, evidence, owners, review cadence, and source-linked implementation guidance. - [ISO/IEC 27017 Cloud Service Agreements FAQ](/artifacts/global/iso-27017/faq/cloud-service-agreements.md): How should teams handle Cloud Service Agreements under ISO/IEC 27017? Practical answer with owners, evidence, review triggers, and external source references. - [ISO/IEC 27017 Compliance Guide](/artifacts/global/iso-27017/compliance.md): ISO/IEC 27017 Compliance for ISO/IEC 27017 Cloud Security Controls: practical decisions, evidence, owners, review cadence, and source-linked implementation guidance. - [ISO/IEC 27017 Control Mapping to ISO/IEC 27001 Guide](/artifacts/global/iso-27017/control-mapping-to-iso-27001.md): ISO/IEC 27017 Control Mapping to ISO/IEC 27001 for ISO/IEC 27017 Cloud Security Controls: practical decisions, evidence, owners, review cadence, and source-linked implementation guidance. - [ISO/IEC 27017 Customer Controls FAQ](/artifacts/global/iso-27017/faq/customer-controls.md): How should teams handle Customer Controls under ISO/IEC 27017? Practical answer with owners, evidence, review triggers, and external source references. - [ISO/IEC 27017 Hyperscaler Evidence Pack](/artifacts/global/iso-27017/hyperscaler-evidence-pack.md): ISO/IEC 27017 Hyperscaler Evidence Pack for ISO/IEC 27017 Cloud Security Controls: practical decisions, evidence, owners, review cadence, and source-linked implementation guidance. - [ISO/IEC 27017 Hyperscaler Evidence Pack Workflow](/artifacts/global/iso-27017/hyperscaler-evidence-pack-workflow.md): ISO/IEC 27017 Hyperscaler Evidence Pack Workflow for ISO/IEC 27017 Cloud Security Controls: practical decisions, evidence, owners, review cadence, and source-linked implementation guidance. - [ISO/IEC 27017 Logging FAQ](/artifacts/global/iso-27017/faq/logging.md): How should teams handle Logging under ISO/IEC 27017? Practical answer with owners, evidence, review triggers, and external source references. - [ISO/IEC 27017 Provider Evidence FAQ](/artifacts/global/iso-27017/faq/provider-evidence.md): How should teams handle Provider Evidence under ISO/IEC 27017? Practical answer with owners, evidence, review triggers, and external source references. - [ISO/IEC 27017 Shared Responsibility FAQ](/artifacts/global/iso-27017/faq/shared-responsibility.md): How should teams handle Shared Responsibility under ISO/IEC 27017? Practical answer with owners, evidence, review triggers, and external source references. - [ISO/IEC 27017 Shared Responsibility Model Guide](/artifacts/global/iso-27017/shared-responsibility-model.md): ISO/IEC 27017 Shared Responsibility Model for ISO/IEC 27017 Cloud Security Controls: practical decisions, evidence, owners, review cadence, and source-linked implementation guidance. - [ISO/IEC 27017 Virtualization Responsibilities FAQ](/artifacts/global/iso-27017/faq/virtualization-responsibilities.md): How should teams handle Virtualization Responsibilities under ISO/IEC 27017? Practical answer with owners, evidence, review triggers, and external source references. - [ISO/IEC 27017 vs CSA CCM Comparison](/artifacts/global/iso-27017/iso-27017-vs-csa-ccm.md): ISO/IEC 27017 vs CSA CCM for ISO/IEC 27017 Cloud Security Controls: practical decisions, evidence, owners, review cadence, and source-linked implementation guidance. - [ISO/IEC 27017 vs ISO/IEC 27018 Comparison](/artifacts/global/iso-27017/iso-27017-vs-iso-27018.md): ISO/IEC 27017 vs ISO/IEC 27018 for ISO/IEC 27017 Cloud Security Controls: practical decisions, evidence, owners, review cadence, and source-linked implementation guidance. - [ISO/IEC 27017 vs SOC 2 Comparison](/artifacts/global/iso-27017/iso-27017-vs-soc-2.md): ISO/IEC 27017 vs SOC 2 for ISO/IEC 27017 Cloud Security Controls: practical decisions, evidence, owners, review cadence, and source-linked implementation guidance. --- [Privacy Policy](https://www.sorena.io/privacy) | [Terms of Use](https://www.sorena.io/terms-of-use) | [DMCA](https://www.sorena.io/dmca) | [About Us](https://www.sorena.io/about-us) (c) 2026 Sorena AB (559573-7338). All rights reserved. Source: https://www.sorena.io/artifacts/global/iso-27017/csp-vs-csc-role-split