--- title: "ISO/IEC 27001 Statement of Applicability template: Annex A control selection and justification" canonical_url: "https://www.sorena.io/artifacts/global/iso-27001/statement-of-applicability-template" source_url: "https://www.sorena.io/artifacts/global/iso-27001/statement-of-applicability-template" author: "Sorena AI" description: "ISO/IEC 27001 Statement of Applicability Template for ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Information Security Management System: scope decisions, ownership, evidence records, and review actions." published_at: "2026-05-09" updated_at: "2026-05-09" keywords: - "ISO/IEC 27001 Statement of Applicability Template" - "ISO/IEC 27001" - "ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Information Security Management System" - "ISO/IEC 27001 Statement of Applicability Template checklist" - "ISO/IEC 27001 Statement of Applicability Template evidence" - "ISO/IEC 27001 Statement of Applicability Template implementation" - "Template and Workflow" - "global compliance" --- **[SORENA](https://www.sorena.io/)** - AI-Powered GRC Platform [Home](https://www.sorena.io/) | [Solutions](https://www.sorena.io/solutions) | [Artifacts](https://www.sorena.io/artifacts) | [About Us](https://www.sorena.io/about-us) | [Contact](https://www.sorena.io/contact) | [Portal](https://app.sorena.io) --- # ISO/IEC 27001 Statement of Applicability template: Annex A control selection and justification ISO/IEC 27001 Statement of Applicability Template for ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Information Security Management System: scope decisions, ownership, evidence records, and review actions. *Practical tool* *Global* *ISO/IEC 27001* ## ISO/IEC 27001 Statement of Applicability Template ISO/IEC 27001 Statement of Applicability Template should help teams make a decision, assign owners, and collect evidence under ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Information Security Management System. This guide walks through topic-specific decisions, owners, evidence requirements, review gates, and traceability steps so teams can implement repeatable ISO/IEC 27001 outcomes. Use this ISO/IEC 27001 Statement of Applicability Template to capture the controls your ISMS needs, why each control is included or excluded, who owns it, and what evidence proves it is in place. ## What decision should teams make about ISO/IEC 27001 Statement of Applicability Template under ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Information Security Management System? For ISMS work, keep the traceability chain visible: scope, risk, treatment choice, SoA entry, control owner, evidence sample, exception, corrective action, and management review decision. The first decision is whether ISO/IEC 27001 Statement of Applicability Template changes scope, risk, control selection, evidence, certification readiness, customer commitments, or regulatory mapping. If it does, treat it as an accountable management-system decision rather than a side note. Use the template as a working record, not just a definition page: list the required Annex A controls, note whether each control is implemented, capture the justification for inclusion or exclusion, and record the approval and review date. ISO/IEC 27001 is useful when it turns broad intent into repeatable work: run an auditable information security management system that connects scope, risk, treatment, Annex A controls, evidence, and continual improvement. The page should therefore end in ownership, evidence, and review cadence, not only a definition. - Control or topic: name the Annex A control or ISMS topic. - Decision: include, exclude, or not applicable. - Justification: explain why the control is needed or why it is excluded. - Implementation status: implemented, planned, partially implemented, or not implemented. - Owner: assign the person or role responsible. - Evidence: link the record, test, log, policy, or approval. - Review date: record when the entry will be reassessed. Sources for this answer: - [ISO/IEC 27001:2022 standard page](https://www.iso.org/standard/27001?ref=sorena.io) - Use this source as the governing requirements context for ISO/IEC 27001 scope, control governance, and review cadence in ISMS operations. - [ISO/IEC 27002:2022 standard page](https://www.iso.org/standard/75652.html?ref=sorena.io) - This source supports control implementation guidance and control-implementation expectations supporting ISO/IEC 27001 governance. ## Which records should prove ISO/IEC 27001 Statement of Applicability Template is implemented correctly? Evidence should be collected where the work actually happens. For ISO/IEC 27001, that usually means ISMS scope, risk methodology, risk register, treatment plan, Statement of Applicability, Annex A control evidence, audit records, nonconformities, corrective actions, and management review outputs. A strong evidence set should show what was decided, why it was reasonable, who approved it, and the next scheduled review date. - Artifact-specific evidence: ISMS scope, risk assessment, treatment plan, Statement of Applicability, Annex A evidence, internal audits, corrective actions, and management review records. - Decision record: scope, assumption, risk or obligation, owner, approval, and date. - Operation record: ticket, log, review, test, contract clause, register entry, or control sample showing the process ran. - Review record: result, exception, corrective action, next owner, and next review date. Sources for this answer: - [ISO/IEC 27002:2022 standard page](https://www.iso.org/standard/75652.html?ref=sorena.io) - This source supports control implementation guidance and control-implementation expectations supporting ISO/IEC 27001 governance. - [ISO/IEC 27005:2022 standard page](https://www.iso.org/standard/80585.html?ref=sorena.io) - This source supports risk treatment and monitoring context that informs control decisions and residual risk handling. ## How should teams turn ISO/IEC 27001 Statement of Applicability Template into a repeatable workflow? Build the workflow around a small number of durable checkpoints: intake, classification, owner assignment, evidence request, decision, review, and escalation. This keeps the work usable across audits, customer assurance, and operational reviews. Avoid overfitting the workflow to one audit cycle. The same record should help during normal operations, change review, incident response, supplier review, or management review depending on the topic. - Intake: describe the system, service, supplier, control, incident, security-critical system, or process affected. - Classification: decide whether this is scope, risk, treatment, evidence, contract, incident, privacy, continuity, or security governance work. - Escalation: route exceptions to the person or forum that can accept risk or fund remediation. Sources for this answer: - [ISO/IEC 27005:2022 standard page](https://www.iso.org/standard/80585.html?ref=sorena.io) - This source supports risk treatment and monitoring context that informs control decisions and residual risk handling. - [ISO/IEC 27001:2022 standard page](https://www.iso.org/standard/27001?ref=sorena.io) - Use this source as the governing requirements context for ISO/IEC 27001 scope, control governance, and review cadence in ISMS operations. *Recommended next step* *Placement: after implementation guidance* ## Operationalize ISO/IEC 27001 Statement of Applicability Template Use this ISO/IEC 27001 guide as the starting point for a tracked workflow: assign owners, request evidence, record decisions, and keep review dates visible instead of leaving the guidance in a document. - [Open Assessment Autopilot for ISO/IEC 27001](/solutions/assessment.md): Convert ISO/IEC 27001 Statement of Applicability Template into accountable tasks, evidence requests, and review checkpoints. - [Talk through implementation](/contact.md): Review your current scope, evidence gaps, and next implementation steps. ## What mistakes make ISO/IEC 27001 Statement of Applicability Template weak or hard to audit? Generic guidance loses value when it omits the concrete owner, scope boundary, supplier impact, recovery objective, control sample, and risk decision evidence; this section focuses on those elements so reviewers can verify what changed and why Another failure is mixing standards and regulations without stating which source creates the requirement. Use ISO standards to structure management-system practice, and use legal sources separately when a binding obligation applies. - Do not cite a standard title as evidence that a process is operating. - Do not reuse an old audit artifact after the scope, service, supplier, or risk has changed. - Do not hide exceptions; record them as risk acceptance, corrective action, or management-review inputs. Sources for this answer: - [ISO/IEC 27001:2022 standard page](https://www.iso.org/standard/27001?ref=sorena.io) - Use this source as the governing requirements context for ISO/IEC 27001 scope, control governance, and review cadence in ISMS operations. - [ISO/IEC 27002:2022 standard page](https://www.iso.org/standard/75652.html?ref=sorena.io) - This source supports control implementation guidance and control-implementation expectations supporting ISO/IEC 27001 governance. ## How should teams review and improve ISO/IEC 27001 Statement of Applicability Template over time? Review should happen at planned ISMS intervals, before certification milestones, after significant changes, and whenever risk or control evidence no longer reflects reality. If the review changes the decision, update the register, workflow, control evidence, or contract record that downstream teams rely on. Improvement is strongest when the same evidence supports multiple needs: certification audits, customer assurance, regulatory mapping, supplier governance, incident reviews, and management review. - Set a review date and a change-trigger rule. - Track findings until closure and connect them to corrective actions or risk acceptance. - Use management review to decide resourcing, risk appetite, scope changes, and evidence quality. Sources for this answer: - [ISO/IEC 27002:2022 standard page](https://www.iso.org/standard/75652.html?ref=sorena.io) - This source supports control implementation guidance and control-implementation expectations supporting ISO/IEC 27001 governance. - [ISO/IEC 27005:2022 standard page](https://www.iso.org/standard/80585.html?ref=sorena.io) - This source supports risk treatment and monitoring context that informs control decisions and residual risk handling. ## Primary sources - [ISO/IEC 27001:2022 standard page](https://www.iso.org/standard/27001?ref=sorena.io) - Use this source as the governing requirements context for ISO/IEC 27001 scope, control governance, and review cadence in ISMS operations. - Quote: "Information security management systems - Requirements" - [ISO/IEC 27002:2022 standard page](https://www.iso.org/standard/75652.html?ref=sorena.io) - This source supports control implementation guidance and control-implementation expectations supporting ISO/IEC 27001 governance. - Quote: "Information security controls" - [ISO/IEC 27005:2022 standard page](https://www.iso.org/standard/80585.html?ref=sorena.io) - This source supports risk treatment and monitoring context that informs control decisions and residual risk handling. - Quote: "Guidance on managing information security risks" ## Related Topic Guides - [ISO/IEC 27001 Annex A Control Evidence Guide](/artifacts/global/iso-27001/annex-a-2022-control-evidence.md): Build useful ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A control evidence: selected controls, SoA rationale, owners, implementation proof, effectiveness checks, audit records, and improvement actions. - [ISO/IEC 27001 Annex A Control Ownership FAQ](/artifacts/global/iso-27001/faq/annex-a-control-ownership.md): How should teams assign Annex A Control Ownership under ISO/IEC 27001? Practical answer with owners, evidence, review triggers, and external source references. - [ISO/IEC 27001 Audit Readiness Guide](/artifacts/global/iso-27001/audit-readiness.md): Prepare ISO/IEC 27001 audit evidence across ISMS scope, risk assessment, risk treatment, Statement of Applicability, Annex A controls, internal audit, management review, and corrective actions. - [ISO/IEC 27001 Certification Body Evidence FAQ](/artifacts/global/iso-27001/faq/certification-body-evidence.md): How should teams handle Certification Body Evidence under ISO/IEC 27001? Practical answer with owners, evidence, review triggers, and external source references. - [ISO/IEC 27001 Certification Stage Workflow](/artifacts/global/iso-27001/certification-stage-workflow.md): A practical ISO/IEC 27001 certification workflow for scope readiness, Stage 1 document review, Stage 2 evidence, nonconformities, corrective action, certification decision, surveillance, and recertification. - [ISO/IEC 27001 Compliance Guide: ISMS Evidence](/artifacts/global/iso-27001/compliance.md): Build ISO/IEC 27001 compliance around ISMS scope, risk assessment, risk treatment, Statement of Applicability, Annex A controls, audits, management review, and corrective action evidence. - [ISO/IEC 27001 FAQ: ISMS Scope, Risk and SoA](/artifacts/global/iso-27001/faq.md): Practical ISO/IEC 27001 FAQ covering ISMS scope, risk assessment, risk treatment, Statement of Applicability, Annex A controls, certification evidence, audits, management review, and surveillance readiness. - [ISO/IEC 27001 Implementation Roadmap Guide](/artifacts/global/iso-27001/implementation-roadmap.md): ISO/IEC 27001 Implementation Roadmap for ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Information Security Management System: scope decisions, ownership, evidence records, and review actions. - [ISO/IEC 27001 Internal Audit and Management Review Guide](/artifacts/global/iso-27001/internal-audit-and-management-review.md): ISO/IEC 27001 Internal Audit and Management Review for ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Information Security Management System: scope decisions, ownership, evidence records, and review actions. - [ISO/IEC 27001 Internal Audit FAQ](/artifacts/global/iso-27001/faq/internal-audit.md): How should teams run ISO/IEC 27001 internal audits: who should own each step, what evidence is expected, and how findings are resolved. - [ISO/IEC 27001 Management Review FAQ](/artifacts/global/iso-27001/faq/management-review.md): How should teams handle Management Review under ISO/IEC 27001? Practical answer with owners, evidence, review triggers, and external source references. - [ISO/IEC 27001 Requirements Guide](/artifacts/global/iso-27001/requirements.md): ISO/IEC 27001 Requirements for ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Information Security Management System: scope decisions, ownership, evidence records, and review actions. - [ISO/IEC 27001 Risk Acceptance FAQ](/artifacts/global/iso-27001/faq/risk-acceptance.md): How should teams handle Risk Acceptance under ISO/IEC 27001? Practical answer with owners, evidence, review triggers, and external source references. - [ISO/IEC 27001 Risk Treatment and Residual Risk Guide](/artifacts/global/iso-27001/risk-treatment-and-residual-risk.md): ISO/IEC 27001 Risk Treatment and Residual Risk for ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Information Security Management System: scope decisions, ownership, evidence records, and review actions. - [ISO/IEC 27001 Risk Treatment Register Workflow](/artifacts/global/iso-27001/risk-treatment-register-workflow.md): ISO/IEC 27001 Risk Treatment Register Workflow for ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Information Security Management System: scope decisions, ownership, evidence records, and review actions. - [ISO/IEC 27001 SoA Exclusions FAQ](/artifacts/global/iso-27001/faq/soa-exclusions.md): How should teams justify Statement of Applicability exclusions under ISO/IEC 27001? Practical answer with owners, evidence, review triggers, and external source references. - [ISO/IEC 27001 SoA: workflow for gathering and documenting control evidence](/artifacts/global/iso-27001/statement-of-applicability-evidence-workflow.md): ISO/IEC 27001 Statement of Applicability Evidence Workflow for ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Information Security Management System: scope decisions, ownership, evidence records, and review actions. - [ISO/IEC 27001 Surveillance Audits FAQ](/artifacts/global/iso-27001/faq/surveillance-audits.md): How should teams handle Surveillance Audits under ISO/IEC 27001? Practical answer with owners, evidence, review triggers, and external source references. - [ISO/IEC 27001 vs NIS2 Comparison](/artifacts/global/iso-27001/iso-27001-vs-nis2.md): ISO/IEC 27001 vs NIS2 for ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Information Security Management System: scope decisions, ownership, evidence records, and review actions. - [ISO/IEC 27001 vs NIST CSF 2.0 Comparison](/artifacts/global/iso-27001/iso-27001-vs-nist-csf-2-0.md): ISO/IEC 27001 vs NIST CSF 2.0 for ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Information Security Management System: scope decisions, ownership, evidence records, and review actions. - [ISO/IEC 27001 vs SOC 2 Comparison](/artifacts/global/iso-27001/iso-27001-vs-soc-2.md): ISO/IEC 27001 vs SOC 2 for ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Information Security Management System: scope decisions, ownership, evidence records, and review actions. --- [Privacy Policy](https://www.sorena.io/privacy) | [Terms of Use](https://www.sorena.io/terms-of-use) | [DMCA](https://www.sorena.io/dmca) | [About Us](https://www.sorena.io/about-us) (c) 2026 Sorena AB (559573-7338). All rights reserved. Source: https://www.sorena.io/artifacts/global/iso-27001/statement-of-applicability-template