--- title: "EU Taxonomy CapEx Plan Evidence Workflow" canonical_url: "https://www.sorena.io/artifacts/eu/taxonomy-regulation/capex-plan-evidence-workflow" source_url: "https://www.sorena.io/artifacts/eu/taxonomy-regulation/capex-plan-evidence-workflow" author: "Sorena AI" description: "Build an EU Taxonomy CapEx plan evidence workflow for Article 8 CapEx KPI reporting, management-body approval, milestones, amendments, allocation, and restatement controls." published_at: "2026-05-09" updated_at: "2026-05-09" keywords: - "EU Taxonomy CapEx plan evidence workflow" - "CapEx KPI" - "Article 8 disclosures" - "Taxonomy-aligned CapEx" - "CapEx plan approval" - "technical screening criteria" - "taxonomy evidence" - "CapEx restatement" - "EU Taxonomy" - "CapEx plan" - "Taxonomy alignment" - "management body approval" --- **[SORENA](https://www.sorena.io/)** - AI-Powered GRC Platform [Home](https://www.sorena.io/) | [Solutions](https://www.sorena.io/solutions) | [Artifacts](https://www.sorena.io/artifacts) | [About Us](https://www.sorena.io/about-us) | [Contact](https://www.sorena.io/contact) | [Portal](https://app.sorena.io) --- # EU Taxonomy CapEx Plan Evidence Workflow Build an EU Taxonomy CapEx plan evidence workflow for Article 8 CapEx KPI reporting, management-body approval, milestones, amendments, allocation, and restatement controls. *Taxonomy* *CapEx plan workflow* *EU* ## EU Taxonomy CapEx Plan Evidence Workflow A workflow for proving when CapEx can be counted in the EU Taxonomy CapEx KPI because it is part of a qualifying plan to expand aligned activities or upgrade eligible activities to alignment. Use it to connect Article 8 CapEx plan conditions to evidence records, management approval, milestones, allocation logic, amendments, and restatement controls. A CapEx plan is not a generic sustainability roadmap. Under the EU Taxonomy Disclosures Delegated Act, it is a specific basis for including capital expenditure in the CapEx KPI numerator when the plan expands Taxonomy-aligned economic activities or upgrades Taxonomy-eligible activities so they become Taxonomy-aligned within the required period. The evidence workflow should therefore prove the activity, the expenditure, the approval, the timing, the milestones, and the consequences if the plan changes or fails. ## Start with the CapEx plan eligibility gate The first control is to confirm that the expenditure is being treated as a CapEx plan item, not as ordinary aligned CapEx or as an individual measure. Annex I to the Disclosures Delegated Act allows the CapEx numerator to include expenditure that is part of a plan to expand Taxonomy-aligned activities or to allow Taxonomy-eligible activities to become Taxonomy-aligned, subject to the plan conditions in that annex. The workflow should force a clear choice between three numerator paths: CapEx already related to aligned assets or processes, CapEx under a qualifying CapEx plan, or CapEx for purchases of aligned output and individual measures. Mixing those paths makes later KPI explanations and assurance review harder. - Record the economic activity, delegated-act activity description, environmental objective, and whether the activity is already aligned or only eligible. - Classify the expenditure path as aligned activity CapEx, CapEx plan expenditure, or purchase of aligned output and individual measures. - For a CapEx plan path, state whether the plan expands an existing Taxonomy-aligned activity or upgrades or commences a Taxonomy-eligible activity to become aligned. - Exclude expenditure that is not necessary to ensure the activity meets the relevant technical screening criteria. - Keep unsupported sustainability wording out of the public record until eligibility, alignment, DNSH, minimum safeguards, and KPI treatment are separately evidenced. Sources for this answer: - [Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2178 (Disclosures Delegated Act)](https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2021/2178/oj/eng?ref=sorena.io) - Binding source for the CapEx KPI numerator paths and the legal conditions attached to CapEx plans. - [Commission Notice C/2023/305 on Article 8 disclosures](https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/305/oj/eng?ref=sorena.io) - Commission interpretation source explaining how comprehensive and precise a CapEx plan should be and how CapEx items should be presented. *Recommended next step* *Placement: after CapEx plan evidence section* ## Turn CapEx plans into reportable evidence Use this workflow to connect EU Taxonomy CapEx plan approval, activity mapping, accounting records, milestones, technical screening criteria, and restatement controls before Article 8 reporting is finalized. - [Open Research Copilot](/solutions/research-copilot.md): Ask EU Taxonomy CapEx plan questions against cited source material. - [Discuss EU Taxonomy implementation](/contact.md): Review CapEx plan evidence gaps, KPI treatment, and reporting controls with Sorena. ## Build the evidence file around approval, timing, and milestones A defensible CapEx plan file should prove the conditions that make the plan countable. The Disclosures Delegated Act requires the plan to aim at expansion of aligned activities or upgrade of eligible activities to alignment within five years, with a longer period allowed only where objectively justified by specific features of the activity and upgrade, up to a maximum of ten years. The same source requires disclosure at economic-activity aggregated level and approval by the management body of the non-financial undertaking, either directly or by delegation. Commission guidance says the five-to-ten-year period starts from that approval, and recommends integrating CapEx plans into CSRD transition plans. - Approval evidence: management-body or delegated approval record, approver identity, approval date, and governance route. - Timing evidence: plan start date from approval, planned completion date, and any objective justification if the period exceeds five years. - Milestone evidence: planned measures, expenditure by measure, timing, and significant intermediary milestones that allow investors to monitor implementation. - Activity-level evidence: economic-activity aggregated disclosure basis and link to the delegated-act technical screening criteria to be met at completion. - Transition-plan link: where the undertaking uses a CSRD transition plan, cross-reference the CapEx plan instead of maintaining inconsistent timelines. Sources for this answer: - [Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2178 (Disclosures Delegated Act)](https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2021/2178/oj/eng?ref=sorena.io) - Specifies the five-year plan period, maximum ten-year justified extension, management-body approval, and activity-level disclosure requirements. - [Commission Notice C/2023/305 on Article 8 disclosures](https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/305/oj/eng?ref=sorena.io) - Clarifies when the CapEx plan period starts and what detail is needed for planned measures, expenditures, timing, and milestones. ## Tie the CapEx amount to accounting records and allocation logic The evidence workflow must connect Taxonomy conclusions to the accounting CapEx base. Annex I defines the CapEx denominator by reference to additions to tangible and intangible assets during the financial year before depreciation, amortisation, re-measurements, revaluations, impairments, and fair-value changes, and also includes additions from business combinations. Where an asset may be used for both aligned and non-aligned projects, Commission guidance says only the proportion of CapEx effectively helping to carry out Taxonomy-aligned activities should be allocated as aligned, using a non-financial metric based on verifiable evidence. Prepayments should not be treated as eligible or aligned CapEx before the relevant CapEx is recognised under the applicable accounting standards. - Accounting evidence: line item, asset class, addition date, applicable IFRS or GAAP basis, and whether the amount is in the CapEx denominator. - Plan evidence: expenditure amount by planned measure and whether it is necessary for the activity to meet the technical screening criteria. - Allocation evidence: non-financial allocation metric, data source, reviewer, and calculation when one asset supports mixed aligned and non-aligned output. - Recognition evidence: proof that the CapEx is recognised under the relevant accounting standard before it is included in the KPI. - Financing evidence: identify public, private, external, or internal financing only for context, because the financing source does not determine Taxonomy alignment. Sources for this answer: - [Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2178 (Disclosures Delegated Act)](https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2021/2178/oj/eng?ref=sorena.io) - Defines the CapEx KPI denominator, numerator, and contextual information requirements for non-financial undertakings. - [Commission Notice C/2023/305 on Article 8 disclosures](https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/305/oj/eng?ref=sorena.io) - Clarifies public funding, CapEx allocation for mixed-use assets, verifiable evidence, and prepayment treatment. ## Monitor amendments, changes, and restatement triggers CapEx plan evidence cannot stop at approval. If the relevant technical screening criteria are amended before completion, the undertaking must either update the plan within two years so the activities are aligned with the amended criteria upon completion or restate the CapEx KPI numerator. If the plan no longer meets the CapEx plan conditions, previously published CapEx KPIs must be restated. Annex I also requires disclosure of material changes during the reporting period in relation to implementation of disclosed CapEx plans. The evidence workflow should capture what changed, why it changed, the impact on the plan, and any restatement of CapEx and OpEx KPIs for past reporting years when the change affects those KPIs. - Change trigger: delegated-act amendment, technical screening criteria amendment, plan delay, scope change, expenditure change, or activity no longer becoming aligned. - Two-year update control: date the amended criteria were identified, owner assigned, plan update due date, and decision to update or restate. - Material-change record: change description, reason, implementation impact, KPI impact, and approval of the revised plan or restatement. - Past-year review: identify each reporting year covered by the plan and whether CapEx or OpEx KPI values need restatement. - Audit trail: keep the old plan, revised plan, source change, approval record, and published disclosure explanation together. Sources for this answer: - [Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2178 (Disclosures Delegated Act)](https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2021/2178/oj/eng?ref=sorena.io) - Requires plan updates or KPI restatement when technical screening criteria change and requires disclosure of material changes to CapEx plans. - [Commission Notice C/2023/305 on Article 8 disclosures](https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/305/oj/eng?ref=sorena.io) - Provides Article 8 interpretation for CapEx KPI reporting, including presentation and monitoring of CapEx plan information. ## Use stop checks before publishing the CapEx KPI story Before the annual report, Article 8 table, investor explanation, or internal dashboard is finalized, run stop checks that are specific to CapEx plans. The aim is to avoid counting expenditure because a roadmap exists, while missing the legal evidence that the roadmap is an approved CapEx plan for Taxonomy purposes. The workflow should also prevent overclaiming. Eligibility does not prove alignment, financing source does not prove alignment, a prepayment is not enough before accounting recognition, and an allocation to mixed-use assets must be supported by verifiable evidence. - Stop if the expenditure is not tied to a Taxonomy-eligible or Taxonomy-aligned economic activity described in an applicable delegated act. - Stop if management-body or delegated approval is missing, undated, or later than the reported plan start date. - Stop if the plan has no planned measures, expenditure amounts, timing, or intermediary milestones. - Stop if a period longer than five years is used without an objective justification in the plan and contextual information. - Stop if technical screening criteria changed and the team has neither updated the plan within the allowed period nor restated the KPI numerator. - Stop if mixed-use asset allocation lacks a verifiable non-financial metric. Sources for this answer: - [Regulation (EU) 2020/852 (Taxonomy Regulation)](https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32020R0852&ref=sorena.io) - Sets the framework for environmentally sustainable economic activities, including substantial contribution, DNSH, minimum safeguards, and technical screening criteria. - [Commission Notice C/2023/305 on Article 8 disclosures](https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/305/oj/eng?ref=sorena.io) - Clarifies CapEx plan precision, mixed-use allocation, prepayments, and the need for verifiable evidence in Article 8 reporting. ## Primary sources - [Regulation (EU) 2020/852 (Taxonomy Regulation)](https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32020R0852&ref=sorena.io) - Binding source for the EU Taxonomy framework, Article 3 alignment conditions, environmental objectives, technical screening criteria, DNSH, minimum safeguards, and Article 8 disclosure basis. - Quote: "qualifies as environmentally sustainable" - [Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2178 (Disclosures Delegated Act)](https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2021/2178/oj/eng?ref=sorena.io) - Binding source for Article 8 disclosure methodology, non-financial undertaking turnover, CapEx, and OpEx KPIs, CapEx plan conditions, contextual information, and restatement rules. - Quote: "KPI related to capital expenditure" - [Commission Notice C/2023/305 on Article 8 disclosures](https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/305/oj/eng?ref=sorena.io) - Commission interpretation source for reporting Taxonomy-eligible and Taxonomy-aligned economic activities and assets, including CapEx plan timing, precision, allocation, public funding, and prepayments. - Quote: "FAQs ON CAPEX KPI" - [Commission Notice on Article 8 eligible activities and assets](https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52022XC1006%2801%29&ref=sorena.io) - Commission interpretation source for eligibility reporting, CapEx and OpEx categories, activity descriptions, voluntary reporting, value-chain boundaries, and double-counting controls. - Quote: "CapEx that is part of a plan" ## Related Topic Guides - [DNSH Appendix C under the EU Taxonomy: chemicals evidence FAQ](/artifacts/eu/taxonomy-regulation/faq/dnsh-appendix-c.md): Practical FAQ on EU Taxonomy DNSH Appendix C chemicals criteria, including SVHCs, CLP hazard classes, the 0.1% w/w threshold, suitable alternatives, and controlled conditions evidence. - [EU Taxonomy 2026 simplification: what should teams do?](/artifacts/eu/taxonomy-regulation/faq/2026-simplification.md): source-linked FAQ on EU Taxonomy 2026 simplification, Regulation (EU) 2026/73, Article 8 reporting, DNSH evidence, and limits on unsupported claims. - [EU Taxonomy Activity Eligibility Workflow](/artifacts/eu/taxonomy-regulation/activity-eligibility-workflow.md): Build an EU Taxonomy activity eligibility workflow that maps economic activities to delegated-act descriptions before alignment, DNSH, and Article 8 KPI reporting. - [EU Taxonomy activity evidence packs: what to retain](/artifacts/eu/taxonomy-regulation/faq/activity-evidence-packs.md): A practical FAQ on EU Taxonomy activity evidence packs: eligibility, alignment, DNSH, minimum safeguards, KPI traceability, and source-linked review records. - [EU Taxonomy Applicability Test for Eligibility and Alignment](/artifacts/eu/taxonomy-regulation/applicability-test.md): Test EU Taxonomy applicability by separating Article 8 reporting scope, Taxonomy eligibility, Taxonomy alignment, DNSH, minimum safeguards, and KPI evidence. - [EU Taxonomy Article 8 disclosure templates](/artifacts/eu/taxonomy-regulation/templates.md): source-linked EU Taxonomy templates for Article 8 reporting, covering non-financial KPIs, financial undertaking annexes, eligibility and alignment evidence, GAR inputs, and publication checks. - [EU Taxonomy Article 8 KPI disclosure workflow](/artifacts/eu/taxonomy-regulation/kpis-and-disclosure-workflow.md): source-linked workflow for EU Taxonomy Article 8 KPI disclosures, covering turnover, CapEx, OpEx, GAR dependencies, templates, contextual information, and publication checks. - [EU Taxonomy Article 8 Scope and Reporting Entities](/artifacts/eu/taxonomy-regulation/scope-and-reporting-entities.md): Determine which financial and non-financial undertakings report under EU Taxonomy Article 8, which annexes apply, and what evidence supports the reporting boundary. - [EU Taxonomy Article 8 Scope FAQ](/artifacts/eu/taxonomy-regulation/faq/article-8-scope.md): source-linked FAQ on EU Taxonomy Article 8 scope, including who reports, which KPI framework applies, and what evidence teams should retain. - [EU Taxonomy auditor evidence: what to keep for alignment review](/artifacts/eu/taxonomy-regulation/faq/auditor-evidence.md): Practical FAQ on EU Taxonomy auditor evidence: what evidence supports eligibility, alignment, DNSH, minimum safeguards, and Article 8 KPI disclosures. - [EU Taxonomy CapEx Plan Evidence: Article 8 checklist](/artifacts/eu/taxonomy-regulation/capex-plan-evidence.md): Build evidence for EU Taxonomy CapEx plans under Article 8, Annex I Section 1.1.2.2 and the Disclosures Delegated Act. - [EU Taxonomy CapEx Plans FAQ: Article 8 CapEx KPI](/artifacts/eu/taxonomy-regulation/faq/capex-plans.md): Practical FAQ on EU Taxonomy CapEx plans under Article 8, Annex I Section 1.1.2.2, management-body approval, timing, activity-level evidence, and KPI restatement. - [EU Taxonomy compliance guide: eligibility, alignment and Article 8 KPIs](/artifacts/eu/taxonomy-regulation/compliance.md): Practical EU Taxonomy compliance guide for mapping eligible activities, testing alignment, collecting DNSH and minimum-safeguards evidence, and preparing Article 8 disclosures. - [EU Taxonomy deadlines and Article 8 compliance calendar](/artifacts/eu/taxonomy-regulation/deadlines-and-compliance-calendar.md): source-linked EU Taxonomy calendar for Article 8 reporting phases, environmental objective application dates, delegated-act updates, and evidence review gates. - [EU Taxonomy Delegated Act Change Tracker](/artifacts/eu/taxonomy-regulation/delegated-act-change-tracker.md): Track adopted and proposed EU Taxonomy delegated-act changes by source, status, affected criteria, Article 8 disclosure impact, owner, and evidence update. - [EU Taxonomy delegated act changes: what teams should check](/artifacts/eu/taxonomy-regulation/faq/delegated-act-changes.md): FAQ on handling EU Taxonomy delegated act changes: official source checks, application dates, affected criteria, disclosures, DNSH evidence, and review records. - [EU Taxonomy Delegated Acts Tracker](/artifacts/eu/taxonomy-regulation/delegated-acts-tracker.md): Track EU Taxonomy delegated acts by legal status, objective, reporting impact, activity scope, DNSH criteria, Article 8 disclosures, and owner follow-up. - [EU Taxonomy DNSH and Minimum Safeguards evidence guide](/artifacts/eu/taxonomy-regulation/dnsh-and-minimum-safeguards.md): source-linked guide to EU Taxonomy DNSH and minimum safeguards: Article 3 alignment gates, Article 17 significant harm, Article 18 safeguards, evidence records, and KPI controls. - [EU Taxonomy DNSH Appendix C: chemicals evidence guide](/artifacts/eu/taxonomy-regulation/dnsh-appendix-c.md): source-linked guide to EU Taxonomy DNSH Appendix C chemicals checks, including SVHC thresholds, alternatives, controlled conditions, and evidence records. - [EU Taxonomy Eligibility vs Alignment](/artifacts/eu/taxonomy-regulation/taxonomy-eligibility-vs-alignment.md): Compare EU Taxonomy eligibility and alignment under Article 8: what each term means, what evidence is needed, which KPIs are affected, and why eligibility is not proof of sustainability. - [EU Taxonomy Eligibility vs Alignment Explained](/artifacts/eu/taxonomy-regulation/taxonomy-eligibility-vs-alignment-explained.md): Explain EU Taxonomy eligibility and alignment under Article 8, the Disclosures Delegated Act, Article 3, technical screening criteria, DNSH, and safeguards. - [EU Taxonomy eligibility vs alignment: what is the difference?](/artifacts/eu/taxonomy-regulation/faq/eligibility-vs-alignment.md): Eligibility means an activity is covered by Taxonomy delegated acts; alignment means it also meets Article 3 conditions, technical screening criteria, DNSH, and minimum safeguards. - [EU Taxonomy FAQ: eligibility, alignment, DNSH, safeguards, and Article 8](/artifacts/eu/taxonomy-regulation/faq.md): EU Taxonomy FAQ hub for eligibility, alignment, technical screening criteria, DNSH, minimum safeguards, Article 8 KPIs, delegated acts, and evidence records. - [EU Taxonomy Financial KPIs and Green Asset Ratio (GAR) FAQ](/artifacts/eu/taxonomy-regulation/faq/financial-kpis-and-gar.md): FAQ on EU Taxonomy Article 8 financial undertaking KPIs, credit institution Green Asset Ratio (GAR), reporting dates, exclusions, and qualitative disclosures. - [EU Taxonomy GAR and financial undertaking KPIs](/artifacts/eu/taxonomy-regulation/gar-and-financial-undertaking-kpis.md): source-linked guide to EU Taxonomy Article 8 financial undertaking KPIs, including GAR, asset manager KPIs, investment firm KPIs, insurance KPIs, exclusions, and reporting evidence. - [EU Taxonomy GAR KPI workflow for credit institutions](/artifacts/eu/taxonomy-regulation/gar-kpi-workflow.md): source-linked workflow for preparing EU Taxonomy Green Asset Ratio (GAR) KPI disclosures under Article 8 and the Disclosures Delegated Act. - [EU Taxonomy minimum safeguards FAQ: Article 18 evidence](/artifacts/eu/taxonomy-regulation/faq/minimum-safeguards.md): FAQ on EU Taxonomy minimum safeguards under Article 18: who must comply, which OECD, UNGP, ILO and human-rights evidence to keep, and common reporting mistakes. - [EU Taxonomy Minimum Safeguards: Article 18 and evidence](/artifacts/eu/taxonomy-regulation/minimum-safeguards.md): Understand how Article 18 minimum safeguards fit into EU Taxonomy alignment, which international standards they reference, and what evidence supports the assessment. - [EU Taxonomy non-financial KPIs: turnover, CapEx and OpEx](/artifacts/eu/taxonomy-regulation/faq/non-financial-kpis.md): Article 8 FAQ for non-financial undertakings reporting EU Taxonomy turnover, CapEx and OpEx KPIs, with evidence and source checks. - [EU Taxonomy Penalties and Fines: Article 22 Disclosure Risk](/artifacts/eu/taxonomy-regulation/penalties-and-fines.md): Understand where EU Taxonomy penalty exposure starts: Article 22 measures and penalties for Articles 5, 6, and 7 financial product disclosures, with practical evidence controls. - [EU Taxonomy Regulation Checklist for Eligibility and Alignment](/artifacts/eu/taxonomy-regulation/checklist.md): A source-linked EU Taxonomy checklist for mapping eligible activities, testing alignment, documenting DNSH and minimum safeguards, and preparing Article 8 KPI disclosures. - [EU Taxonomy Regulation requirements: eligibility, alignment, KPIs](/artifacts/eu/taxonomy-regulation/requirements.md): Understand the core EU Taxonomy requirements: Article 3 alignment tests, eligible activities, DNSH, minimum safeguards, Article 8 KPIs, and evidence to keep. - [EU Taxonomy screening criteria and documentation guide](/artifacts/eu/taxonomy-regulation/screening-criteria-and-documentation.md): How to document EU Taxonomy eligibility, alignment, technical screening criteria, DNSH, minimum safeguards, and Article 8 KPI disclosures without overstating the evidence. - [EU Taxonomy Six Environmental Objectives | Article 9 FAQ](/artifacts/eu/taxonomy-regulation/faq/six-environmental-objectives.md): Plain-English FAQ on the six EU Taxonomy environmental objectives in Article 9 and how teams should map activities, DNSH checks, safeguards, and evidence. - [EU Taxonomy vs CSRD: Article 8 Reporting Comparison](/artifacts/eu/taxonomy-regulation/taxonomy-vs-csrd.md): Compare EU Taxonomy Article 8 disclosures with CSRD sustainability reporting scope, evidence, KPIs, assurance, and reuse limits using official EU Taxonomy sources. - [EU Taxonomy vs SFDR: Scope, KPIs, and Evidence](/artifacts/eu/taxonomy-regulation/taxonomy-vs-sfdr.md): Compare the EU Taxonomy and the SFDR link points that appear in Taxonomy materials: activity classification, Article 8 KPIs, product disclosures, data reuse, and evidence limits. --- [Privacy Policy](https://www.sorena.io/privacy) | [Terms of Use](https://www.sorena.io/terms-of-use) | [DMCA](https://www.sorena.io/dmca) | [About Us](https://www.sorena.io/about-us) (c) 2026 Sorena AB (559573-7338). All rights reserved. Source: https://www.sorena.io/artifacts/eu/taxonomy-regulation/capex-plan-evidence-workflow