---
title: "What should an EU MDR PMCF plan and report cover?"
canonical_url: "https://www.sorena.io/artifacts/eu/medical-device-regulation/faq/pmcf"
source_url: "https://www.sorena.io/artifacts/eu/medical-device-regulation/faq/pmcf"
author: "Sorena AI"
description: "Under the EU MDR, PMCF is part of PMS and clinical evaluation. See what the plan, activities, report, updates, and retained evidence should cover."
published_at: "2026-05-09"
updated_at: "2026-05-09"
keywords:
  - "EU Medical Device Regulation"
  - "EU MDR"
  - "PMCF"
  - "post-market clinical follow-up"
  - "clinical evaluation"
  - "PMS"
---
**[SORENA](https://www.sorena.io/)** - AI-Powered GRC Platform

[Home](https://www.sorena.io/) | [Solutions](https://www.sorena.io/solutions) | [Artifacts](https://www.sorena.io/artifacts) | [About Us](https://www.sorena.io/about-us) | [Contact](https://www.sorena.io/contact) | [Portal](https://app.sorena.io)

---

# What should an EU MDR PMCF plan and report cover?

Under the EU MDR, PMCF is part of PMS and clinical evaluation. See what the plan, activities, report, updates, and retained evidence should cover.

*FAQ* *EU MDR*

## EU MDR PMCF plan and report

PMCF is the MDR post-market clinical follow-up process for proactively collecting and evaluating clinical data from a CE-marked device used within its intended purpose.

Use this FAQ to align the PMCF plan, PMCF activities, clinical-evaluation updates, PMS outputs, and technical-documentation evidence.

An EU MDR PMCF plan should show how the manufacturer will collect and evaluate post-market clinical data to confirm safety, performance, clinical benefit where applicable, residual-risk acceptability, benefit-risk acceptability, emerging risks, side-effects, contraindications, and possible systematic misuse or off-label use.

## What should the PMCF plan cover?

PMCF is a continuous process that updates the clinical evaluation under Article 61 and Annex XIV, Part B. It must be addressed in the manufacturer's PMS plan and performed under a documented PMCF plan.

The plan should identify the device and covered variants, intended purpose, users, patient population, indications, contraindications, warnings, classification, expected lifetime, and the PMCF objectives for that device. It should also reference the clinical evaluation report and risk management file so the post-market clinical questions being followed are clear.

- Define general methods such as clinical experience review, user feedback, scientific literature screening, and other clinical-data sources.
- Define specific methods where needed, such as suitable registries, PMCF studies, real-world evidence analyses, healthcare-professional surveys, patient or user surveys, and case-report review.
- For each activity, state the source of the need, objective, rationale, known limitations, data quality expectations, endpoints or analysis approach, and justified schedule for analysis and reporting.
- Reference applicable common specifications, harmonised standards used by the manufacturer, and PMCF guidance where they support the plan.

Sources for this answer:

- [Regulation (EU) 2017/745 on medical devices](https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2017/745/oj?ref=sorena.io) - Binding MDR source for Article 61, Article 83-86, Annex III, and Annex XIV Part B requirements on clinical evaluation, PMS, PMCF planning, PMCF reports, PSUR content, and technical documentation.
- [MDCG 2020-7 - PMCF plan template](https://health.ec.europa.eu/medical-devices-sector/new-regulations/guidance-mdcg-endorsed-documents-and-other-guidance_en/document/download/a5cdb303-c782-4010-8723-7d389af678f7%5Fen?filename=md%5Fmdcg%5F2020%5F7%5Fguidance%5Fpmcf%5Fplan%5Ftemplate%5Fen.pdf&ref=sorena.io) - MDCG template source for PMCF plan sections, device description, PMCF methods and activities, links to the clinical evaluation report and risk management file, equivalent or similar device data, standards or guidance references, and report timing fields.

## What evidence should be retained?

Keep evidence showing that PMCF was planned, performed, analysed, and used to update the device file. The retained record should let a reviewer trace each PMCF activity from the clinical question or risk being monitored to the data source, method, result, conclusion, and follow-up action.

The PMCF evaluation report becomes part of the clinical evaluation report and technical documentation. PMCF conclusions must be considered in the clinical evaluation and risk management; where PMCF identifies a need for preventive or corrective measures, the manufacturer must implement them.

- Retain the PMCF plan, revision history, activity table, protocols, search strategies, registry or study summaries, survey instruments, case-review records, and analysis outputs.
- Retain the PMCF evaluation report with links to the clinical evaluation report, risk management file, PMS plan, PMS report or PSUR where applicable, and any preventive or corrective action records.
- Keep the rationale for method choice, sample size or data sufficiency, endpoints, comparator or state-of-the-art references, known limitations, missing-data handling, and acceptance criteria where used.
- If no PMCF activity is planned or an activity is limited, retain the MDR-grounded justification and the evidence showing why the residual clinical questions remain adequately controlled.

Sources for this answer:

- [Regulation (EU) 2017/745 on medical devices](https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2017/745/oj?ref=sorena.io) - Binding MDR source for the requirement that PMCF findings are documented in a PMCF evaluation report, included in the clinical evaluation report and technical documentation, and considered for clinical evaluation, risk management, and preventive or corrective measures.
- [MDCG 2020-13 - clinical evaluation assessment report template](https://health.ec.europa.eu/medical-devices-sector/new-regulations/guidance-mdcg-endorsed-documents-and-other-guidance_en/document/download/02f50abc-91db-4ad9-b137-6ffedb690716%5Fen?filename=md%5F2020-13-cea-report-template%5Fen.pdf&ref=sorena.io) - MDCG template source showing notified-body review prompts for PMS plan, PMS report where relevant, PMCF plan, PMCF report where relevant, PSUR if available, and clinical-evaluation update planning.

## Primary sources

- [Regulation (EU) 2017/745 on medical devices](https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2017/745/oj?ref=sorena.io) - Binding MDR source for Article 61, Article 83-86, Annex III, and Annex XIV Part B requirements on clinical evaluation, PMS, PMCF planning, PMCF reports, PSUR content, and technical documentation.
  - Quote: "PMCF shall be performed pursuant to a documented method laid down in a PMCF plan."
- [MDCG 2020-7 - PMCF plan template](https://health.ec.europa.eu/medical-devices-sector/new-regulations/guidance-mdcg-endorsed-documents-and-other-guidance_en/document/download/a5cdb303-c782-4010-8723-7d389af678f7%5Fen?filename=md%5Fmdcg%5F2020%5F7%5Fguidance%5Fpmcf%5Fplan%5Ftemplate%5Fen.pdf&ref=sorena.io) - MDCG template source for PMCF plan sections, device description, PMCF methods and activities, links to the clinical evaluation report and risk management file, equivalent or similar device data, standards or guidance references, and report timing fields.
  - Quote: "The PMCF plan shall be part of the post-market surveillance plan."
- [MDCG 2020-13 - clinical evaluation assessment report template](https://health.ec.europa.eu/medical-devices-sector/new-regulations/guidance-mdcg-endorsed-documents-and-other-guidance_en/document/download/02f50abc-91db-4ad9-b137-6ffedb690716%5Fen?filename=md%5F2020-13-cea-report-template%5Fen.pdf&ref=sorena.io) - MDCG template source showing notified-body review prompts for PMS plan, PMS report where relevant, PMCF plan, PMCF report where relevant, PSUR if available, and clinical-evaluation update planning.
  - Quote: "PMS, PMCF and the plan for updates"

## Topic Guides

- [Custom-made medical devices under the EU MDR | EU MDR FAQ](/artifacts/eu/medical-device-regulation/faq/custom-made-devices.md): Concise EU MDR FAQ on custom-made device definition, mass-produced exclusions, Annex XIII statements, documentation, conformity assessment, PMS, vigilance, and records to retain.
- [EU MDR Annex II and III Technical Documentation](/artifacts/eu/medical-device-regulation/annex-ii-and-iii-technical-documents.md): Build an MDR technical documentation index for Annex II device files and Annex III post-market surveillance evidence, including GSPR, risk, clinical, PMS, UDI, and EUDAMED records.
- [EU MDR Annex VIII Classification Guide](/artifacts/eu/medical-device-regulation/annex-viii-classification.md): Classify EU MDR medical devices under Annex VIII using intended purpose, duration, invasiveness, active device and software rules, and conformity assessment impact.
- [EU MDR Annex XVI products without a medical purpose](/artifacts/eu/medical-device-regulation/annex-xvi-products.md): source-linked EU MDR guide for Annex XVI products: listed product groups, common specifications, clinical evidence, notified-body route, UDI, EUDAMED, PMS, and vigilance evidence before launch.
- [EU MDR Applicability Test](/artifacts/eu/medical-device-regulation/applicability-test.md): Test whether a product, accessory, software function, or Annex XVI product falls under the EU Medical Device Regulation, and record the evidence for the next classification step.
- [EU MDR change assessment workflow](/artifacts/eu/medical-device-regulation/change-assessment-workflow.md): Assess EU MDR device, design, software, intended purpose, QMS, clinical, PMS, UDI, classification, and notified-body impacts before releasing a medical device change.
- [EU MDR Checklist for Medical Device Compliance](/artifacts/eu/medical-device-regulation/checklist.md): Practical EU MDR checklist covering qualification, classification, conformity assessment, technical documentation, GSPR, clinical evidence, UDI, EUDAMED, PMS, vigilance, QMS, and legacy transition evidence.
- [EU MDR classification workflow](/artifacts/eu/medical-device-regulation/classification-workflow.md): A concrete EU MDR classification workflow for intended purpose, device or accessory qualification, Annex VIII rule selection, Rule 11 software review, class outcome, and notified body impact.
- [EU MDR Clinical Evaluation Overview](/artifacts/eu/medical-device-regulation/clinical-evaluation-overview.md): EU MDR clinical evaluation overview covering Article 61, Annex XIV, clinical data sources, equivalence, PMCF, CER evidence, notified body review, GSPR, and benefit-risk support.
- [EU MDR Clinical Evaluation Report Template](/artifacts/eu/medical-device-regulation/clinical-evaluation-report-template.md): A source-linked EU MDR clinical evaluation report template covering intended purpose, GSPR linkage, clinical data appraisal, equivalence limits, PMCF, conclusions, and reviewer signoff.
- [EU MDR clinical evidence guide](/artifacts/eu/medical-device-regulation/clinical-evidence.md): source-linked EU MDR guide to clinical evaluation, clinical investigations, equivalence, PMCF, GSPR support, technical documentation, and notified-body review.
- [EU MDR compliance obligations](/artifacts/eu/medical-device-regulation/compliance.md): EU MDR compliance guide for device qualification, classification, conformity assessment, QMS, technical documentation, UDI, EUDAMED, PMS, vigilance, and legacy transition controls.
- [EU MDR conformity route workflow](/artifacts/eu/medical-device-regulation/conformity-route-workflow.md): source-linked EU MDR workflow for classifying a device, choosing the conformity assessment route, preparing technical and QMS evidence, and reaching certificate, DoC, UDI, EUDAMED, and CE outputs.
- [EU MDR deadlines and compliance calendar](/artifacts/eu/medical-device-regulation/deadlines-and-compliance-calendar.md): Grounded EU MDR calendar for application, legacy-device transition, UDI, EUDAMED, and recurring QMS, technical documentation, clinical, PMS, vigilance, certificate, and change reviews.
- [EU MDR Device Classification Guide](/artifacts/eu/medical-device-regulation/device-classification-guide.md): Classify an EU MDR medical device by intended purpose, Annex VIII duration, invasiveness, active-device and software rules, then document the conformity route impact.
- [EU MDR EUDAMED and UDI registration](/artifacts/eu/medical-device-regulation/eudamed-and-udi.md): source-linked MDR guide to Basic UDI-DI, UDI-DI, EUDAMED device registration, actor roles, labels, technical documentation, and UDI data governance.
- [EU MDR FAQ: qualification, evidence, UDI, and transition](/artifacts/eu/medical-device-regulation/faq.md): Concise EU MDR FAQ covering device qualification, software classification, accessories, custom-made devices, clinical evidence, UDI, EUDAMED, notified bodies, significant changes, and legacy transition.
- [EU MDR Legacy Device Transition](/artifacts/eu/medical-device-regulation/legacy-device-transition.md): source-linked EU MDR legacy device transition guide covering Regulation (EU) 2023/607 conditions, certificate validity, significant-change limits, surveillance, PMS, vigilance, QMS, and evidence records.
- [EU MDR notified body route selection](/artifacts/eu/medical-device-regulation/notified-body-route-selection.md): Choose an EU MDR conformity assessment route by device class, Article 52 option, notified body designation scope, QMS readiness, technical documentation, clinical evidence, and certificate evidence.
- [EU MDR penalties and enforcement risk](/artifacts/eu/medical-device-regulation/penalties-and-fines.md): source-linked EU MDR penalties and enforcement-risk guide covering Article 113, Member State penalty rules, market restrictions, recalls, certificate consequences, and evidence.
- [EU MDR PMS and Vigilance Guide](/artifacts/eu/medical-device-regulation/pms-and-vigilance.md): EU MDR guide to post-market surveillance, PMCF updates, PMS reports, PSURs, serious incident reporting, FSCA/FSN handling, trend reporting, and evidence records.
- [EU MDR PMS and vigilance records](/artifacts/eu/medical-device-regulation/post-market-surveillance-and-vigilance.md): source-linked EU MDR guide to PMS plans, PMS reports, PSURs, PMCF updates, serious incident and FSCA reporting, trend reporting, and EUDAMED evidence handling.
- [EU MDR PMS Plan Template for Medical Devices](/artifacts/eu/medical-device-regulation/post-market-surveillance-plan-template.md): A source-linked EU MDR post-market surveillance plan template covering device scope, PMS data sources, PMCF linkage, vigilance, trend reporting, PMSR or PSUR outputs, roles, cadence, and evidence records.
- [EU MDR QMS and technical file evidence map](/artifacts/eu/medical-device-regulation/qms-and-technical-file.md): Map EU MDR Article 10 QMS duties to Annex II and Annex III technical documentation, PMS, vigilance, UDI records, and notified-body review evidence.
- [EU MDR QMS requirements under Article 10](/artifacts/eu/medical-device-regulation/qms.md): EU MDR QMS guide for Article 10 manufacturer controls covering regulatory strategy, design, risk, clinical evaluation, PMS, vigilance, UDI, suppliers, CAPA, and conformity records.
- [EU MDR qualification and borderline products](/artifacts/eu/medical-device-regulation/qualification-and-borderline-products.md): EU MDR qualification guide for medical purpose claims, accessories, software, Annex XVI products, and borderline routes to classification and conformity assessment.
- [EU MDR qualification workflow](/artifacts/eu/medical-device-regulation/qualification-workflow.md): A concrete EU MDR workflow for deciding whether a product is a medical device, accessory, Annex XVI product, IVD interface, medicinal-product interface, or non-MDR product before classification and conformity assessment.
- [EU MDR requirements checklist](/artifacts/eu/medical-device-regulation/requirements.md): Concrete EU MDR requirements for medical-device scope, classification, GSPR, conformity assessment, technical documentation, QMS, clinical evidence, UDI, EUDAMED, PMS, vigilance, and economic-operator records.
- [EU MDR Rule 11 software classification](/artifacts/eu/medical-device-regulation/rule-11-software.md): Classify MDR medical device software under Rule 11 using intended purpose, diagnosis or therapy decision impact, physiological monitoring, conformity route, clinical evidence, and software-change records.
- [EU MDR significant changes FAQ: legacy-device transition and notified-body review](/artifacts/eu/medical-device-regulation/faq/significant-changes.md): FAQ on MDR significant changes for legacy devices, including intended-purpose, design, software, material, sterilisation, clinical, QMS, notified-body, and evidence impacts.
- [EU MDR Transition Timelines: practical guide](/artifacts/eu/medical-device-regulation/transition-timelines.md): EU Medical Device Regulation guide to Transition Timelines with scope decisions, owner actions, evidence records, source-linked citations, and practical next steps.
- [EU MDR UDI and EUDAMED registration guide](/artifacts/eu/medical-device-regulation/udi-and-eudamed.md): EU MDR guide to Basic UDI-DI, UDI-DI, UDI carriers, EUDAMED actor and device registration, change impacts, and evidence governance.
- [EU MDR vigilance reporting workflow](/artifacts/eu/medical-device-regulation/vigilance-reporting-workflow.md): Concrete EU MDR vigilance workflow for incident intake, serious incident assessment, FSCA and FSN handling, trend reporting, EUDAMED caveats, CAPA, PMS, clinical evaluation updates, and records.
- [How should Basic UDI-DI and UDI-DI be assigned under the EU MDR? | EU MDR FAQ](/artifacts/eu/medical-device-regulation/faq/udi-di-and-basic-udi-di.md): EU MDR FAQ explaining what Basic UDI-DI and UDI-DI identify, how they connect to UDI carriers, EUDAMED records, change triggers, and retained evidence.
- [MDR vs AI Act for medical-device software](/artifacts/eu/medical-device-regulation/mdr-vs-ai-act.md): Compare MDR software qualification, classification, clinical evidence, QMS, PMS, UDI, EUDAMED, and notified-body evidence boundaries against cautiously scoped AI Act overlap.
- [MDR vs GPSR: medical-device boundary checks](/artifacts/eu/medical-device-regulation/mdr-vs-gpsr.md): Compare MDR medical-device scope with general product-safety fallback questions for borderline, non-medical, and Annex XVI products.
- [MDR vs IVDR: medical devices and IVDs compared](/artifacts/eu/medical-device-regulation/mdr-vs-ivdr.md): Compare EU MDR and IVDR scope, classification, conformity routes, technical documentation, clinical or performance evidence, UDI, EUDAMED, PMS, and vigilance.
- [MDR vs Product Liability Directive evidence comparison](/artifacts/eu/medical-device-regulation/mdr-vs-product-liability-directive.md): Compare EU MDR market-access evidence with Product Liability Directive exposure without treating compliance records as a liability outcome.
- [What should manufacturers do when an EU MDR classification changes? | EU MDR FAQ](/artifacts/eu/medical-device-regulation/faq/class-changes.md): Concise EU MDR FAQ on classification changes, intended purpose, software, notified-body route impact, certificates, technical documentation, and retained evidence.
- [When can clinical equivalence be used under the EU MDR?](/artifacts/eu/medical-device-regulation/faq/equivalence.md): EU MDR FAQ on clinical equivalence, including technical, biological, and clinical characteristics, access to equivalent-device data, class III and implantable-device limits, clinical evaluation, PMCF, and retained evidence.
- [When do software or products make medical purpose claims under the EU MDR? | EU MDR FAQ](/artifacts/eu/medical-device-regulation/faq/medical-purpose-claims.md): EU MDR FAQ on medical purpose claims, intended purpose evidence, software qualification, Annex XVI contrasts, and records to keep.
- [When is a PSUR required under the EU MDR and what should it contain? | EU MDR FAQ](/artifacts/eu/medical-device-regulation/faq/psur.md): EU MDR FAQ on PSUR scope, content, update cadence, PMS and PMCF links, notified-body handling, EUDAMED submission, and evidence to retain.
- [When is an accessory regulated under the EU MDR? | EU MDR FAQ](/artifacts/eu/medical-device-regulation/faq/accessories.md): EU MDR FAQ on when an article is a medical device accessory, how intended purpose affects classification, and what evidence to keep.
- [When is software regulated as SaMD under the EU MDR? | EU MDR FAQ](/artifacts/eu/medical-device-regulation/faq/software-and-samd.md): Concise EU MDR FAQ on software qualification, intended medical purpose, Rule 11 classification, modules, clinical evidence, change assessment, UDI, and EUDAMED.
- [Which devices need an SSCP under the EU MDR and what should it include? | EU MDR FAQ](/artifacts/eu/medical-device-regulation/faq/sscp.md): EU MDR FAQ on when an SSCP is required, who prepares, validates, uploads, and updates it, and what evidence should support the summary.
- [Which EUDAMED modules matter under the EU MDR? | EU MDR FAQ](/artifacts/eu/medical-device-regulation/faq/eudamed-modules.md): EU MDR FAQ mapping EUDAMED modules to actor registration, UDI/device data, certificates, clinical investigations, vigilance/PMS, market surveillance, and practical records.

*Recommended next step*

*Placement: after PMCF evidence section*

## Review PMCF evidence before notified-body questions

Map the PMCF plan, PMCF evaluation report, clinical evaluation, PMS output, PSUR where applicable, and technical-documentation evidence before the next MDR review.

- [Open Research Copilot](/solutions/research-copilot.md): Check EU MDR PMCF questions against cited regulatory and MDCG sources.
- [Talk through PMCF implementation](/contact.md): Review PMCF plan scope, activity design, report evidence, and documentation updates.


---

[Privacy Policy](https://www.sorena.io/privacy) | [Terms of Use](https://www.sorena.io/terms-of-use) | [DMCA](https://www.sorena.io/dmca) | [About Us](https://www.sorena.io/about-us)

(c) 2026 Sorena AB (559573-7338). All rights reserved.

Source: https://www.sorena.io/artifacts/eu/medical-device-regulation/faq/pmcf
